Deficiency Index

Miller's Merry Manor

Garrett, Indiana · CCN 155583

12 surveys since 2012, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
28
Surveys
12
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2012–2024
’12’15’20’24
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file11/12

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
76
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
MILLER'S MERRY MANOR
County
De Kalb · rural
Medicare-certified since
1995

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=9, floor 20).

Last survey on record

May 22, 2024

901 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.573.49
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.65—
Annual nurse turnover49.3%48.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3100.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 3 of the 28 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Miller's Merry Manor, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF744May 10, 2022

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure behavior tracking was completed for 5 out of 5 residents reviewed. (Resident 16, Resident 18, Resident 25, Resident 37, and Resident 45) Findings include: 1. A record review for Resident 16, started on 5/5/22 at 1:18 PM, indicated diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Resident 16's MDS (Minimal Data Set) dated 2/15/22, section for mood indicated feeling down, depressed, or hopeless, poor appetite or overeating, and trouble concentrating. In section for behavior of MDS indicated no behaviors. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684May 22, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure safe positioning, skin and wound care was provided for 2 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident 17 and Resident 34). Findings include: 1. In an interview on 5/21/24 at 2:25 PM, Resident 34 indicated they had an infected wound on their left foot. Resident 34 indicated the wound on their left foot was caused by wearing their shoes without wearing socks. Resident 34's record was reviewed on 5/21/24 at 2:40 PM. Diagnoses included diabetes, chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, and an unstageable pressure ulcer of the left heel. Resident 34's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 15 (cognitively intact). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF686May 22, 2024

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure procedures were maintained per facility policy to prevent infection and to promote comfort during the healing of pressure injuries for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident 34). Findings include: In an interview on 5/21/24 at 2:25 PM, Resident 34 indicated they had an infected wound on their left foot. Resident 34 indicated they had been taking antibiotics for the wound infection. Resident 34 indicated the wound on their left foot was caused by wearing new shoes without wearing socks. Resident 34's record was reviewed on 5/21/24 at 2:40 PM. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF880May 22, 2024

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure standard precautions for infection prevention were maintained during a dressing change for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident 34). Findings include: In an interview on 5/21/24 at 2:25 PM, Resident 34 indicated they had a wound on their left foot. Resident 34 indicated the wound on their left foot was caused by wearing their shoes without socks. Resident 34 indicated they had started taking antibiotics due to an infection in the wound. Resident 34's record was reviewed on 5/21/24 at 2:40 PM. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF557May 19, 2023

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure personal possessions were labeled and stored for only individual use for 2 of 6 residents reviewed (Resident 8 and Resident 48). Findings include: During an observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] on 5/11/23 at 10:12 AM, Resident 8 and Resident 48 were residing in the room as roommates with a shared bathroom. In the bathroom, two bottles of [NAME] body wash, a bottle of Softsoap body wash and a bottle of [NAME] de Terre shampoo were observed sitting on the grab bar inside the shower. None of the items had names or markings identifying their owner. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 28 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 22, 2024Standard3 findings
  • May 19, 2023Standard2 findings
  • May 10, 2022Standard3 findings
  • Jan 13, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 16, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Nov 4, 2019Standard3 findings
  • Oct 15, 2018Standard2 findings
  • Nov 7, 2017Standard and complaint4 findings
Show the 4 earlier surveys
  • Aug 25, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 22, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 19, 2016Standard3 findings
  • Nov 30, 2012—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction