Deficiency Index

Stonebridge Desoto

De Soto, Missouri · CCN 265772

18 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2025.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
99
Surveys
18
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse1

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file12/18

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
56
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
STONEBRIDGE SENIOR LIVING
County
Jefferson
Medicare-certified since
2003

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
2
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 82 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Missouri.

Last survey on record

Jun 26, 2026

136 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.873.20
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.59—
Annual nurse turnover68.4%57.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$6,368 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG13.1%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2681.3%E39.4%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C26.3%
CMS’s current file: 32 of the 99 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8124×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6582×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F6952×

    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Stonebridge Desoto, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Jul 24, 2025

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety of one resident (Resident #1) out of three sampled residents when staff failed to place a fall mat next to the resident's bed as directed by the care plan. The resident fell out of bed onto the floor resulting in injury. The facility census was 52. The administration was notified on 07/24/25 of the Past Non-Compliance which occurred on 07/18/25. On 07/18/25, upon notification, the facility administration started an investigation and notified the Department of Health and Senior Services of the fall which resulted in a fracture. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Feb 9, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and distribute food under sanitary conditions, increasing the risk of cross-contamination and food-borne illness. These practices affected all residents. The facility census was 46. Review of the facility's Food Receiving and Storage policy, revised July 2014, showed: - Foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices; - All foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer will be covered, labeled, and dated (use by date). 1. Observation on 02/06/24 at 10:46 A.M. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Aug 5, 2022

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and distribute food under sanitary conditions, increasing the risk of cross-contamination and food-borne illness. These practices had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 46. 1. Observations of the kitchen on 8/2/22 10:58 A.M., showed: - Ice machine drain pipe with an air gap set at one inch (in) near the floor drain and the pipe covered in black grime; - Ice machine drain pipe not aligned over the floor drain and water dripped on the floor; - Walk in refrigerator door drug the floor and loose at the hinges; - Walk in freezer temperature of 4 degrees Fahrenheit with some large ice formed on the refrigeration lines; - Ice formed on food boxes under the fan in the back of the freezer… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Aug 5, 2022

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices for four sampled residents (Residents #20, #21, #28, and #37) and three residents outside of the sample (Residents #8, #11, and #14) during medication administration when facility staff did not wash or sanitize their hands during medication administration. The facility staff also failed to follow appropriate infection control practices when staff administered a medication to a resident (Resident #11) that fell on the resident's chest and staff picked the medication up with his/her bare hand and administered it. Staff also did not wear gloves during insulin (a hormone injected just under the skin to lower blood sugar) administration. The facility's census was 46. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF628Jun 26, 2026

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written notice of transfer to the resident and/or the resident's representative that included all required transfer information, including bed-hold information for six residents (Residents #3, #10, #16, #34, #36 and #40) out of six sampled residents who were transferred to the hospital. The facility census was 49. Review of the facility's policy titled, Bed Holds, dated March 2022, showed: The facility would inform residents upon admission and prior to a transfer for hospitalization or therapeutic leave of the bed-hold policy; Upon admission and when a resident transferred for hospitalization or therapeutic leave, the facility would provide written information regarding the bed-hold policy to the resident or… […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 99 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 26, 2026Standard7 findings
  • Jul 24, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Mar 13, 2025Standard4 findings
  • Feb 9, 2024Standard14 findings
  • Sep 20, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 5, 2022Standard5 findings
  • Dec 19, 2019Standard6 findings
  • Apr 2, 2019Complaint2 findings
Show the 10 earlier surveys
  • Jan 25, 2019Standard9 findings
  • Jan 26, 2018Standard8 findings
  • Jun 29, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 9, 2017Standard7 findings
  • Jan 14, 2016Standard5 findings
  • Sep 24, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 5, 2014Standard15 findings
  • Feb 12, 2014—3 findings
  • Nov 15, 2012—3 findings
  • Sep 16, 2011—7 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction