Stokes County Nursing Home
Danbury, North Carolina · CCN 345166
14 surveys since 2011, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 48
- Surveys
- 14
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 40
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Stokes
- Medicare-certified since
- 1977
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=18, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Nov 21, 2025
353 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.54 | 3.57 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.71 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 25.0% | 45.8% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D853.3% | E16.7% | F426.7% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C213.3% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F7322×
Post nurse staffing information every day.
- F5531×
Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
- F5581×
Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
- F6051×
Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
- F6361×
Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Stokes County Nursing Home, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF838Nov 21, 2025
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment included a contingency plan that was informed by the facility assessment to address the availability of staff and other resources for events that did not require activation of the facility's emergency plan but had the potential to affect resident care. This had the potential to affect 38 of 38 facility residents. The findings included:The review of the facility assessment dated 2025 did not identify a written contingency plan that was informed by the facility assessment to address the availability of nursing staff and other resources for events that did not require activation of the facility's emergency plan but had the potential to affect resident care. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF851Aug 12, 2024
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically submit direct care staffing information based on payroll data to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) as required for quarter three of fiscal year (FY) 2023 (April 1- June 30, 2023). This failure occurred for 1 of 4 quarters reviewed. The findings included: A review of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data report from the Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reports (CASPER) database revealed the facility failed to submit the required PBJ Staffing Data for quarter three of FY 2023. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Aug 12, 2024
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to have a documented water management program for Legionella. Failure to have a water management program had the potential to affect 34 of 34 residents in the facility. The findings included: Review of the facility's Emergency Preparedness Plan last reviewed by the facility on 2/17/2024 and Infection Control policies revealed no evidence of a water management program for Legionella. Interview with the Infection Preventionist (IP) on 8/12/24 at 1:13 PM revealed the IP was unsure about any written water management program for Legionella. Interview with the Administrator on 8/12/24 at 1:24 PM revealed it was the IP that oversaw water management. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Mar 9, 2023
Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to dispose of expired nutritional supplements and failed to dispose of expired individually packaged cartons of juice from 1 of 1 nourishment room. The findings included: Observations of the nourishment room on [DATE] at 11:42 AM and on [DATE] at 10:40 AM revealed the following: a. Nine (2.5 ounce) bottles of a protein supplement on the dry storage rack with a use by date of [DATE]. b. Six (2.5 ounce) bottles of a protein supplement in the refrigerator with a use by date of [DATE]. c. Ten (4 ounce) containers of prune juice in the freezer with a best by date of [DATE]. Dietary Aide #1 was interviewed on [DATE] at 10:43 AM, while she stocked the nourishment room. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF638Mar 9, 2023
Based on staff interviews and medical record review, the facility failed to complete a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment within 92 days of the Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of the previous MDS assessment for 4 of 10 residents (Residents #9, #37, #14 and #2) reviewed for timely completion of MDS assessments. Findings included: 1. Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for Resident #9 revealed the last assessment completed was a quarterly assessment completed on 10/12/22. No other MDS assessments had been completed since 10/12/22. 2. Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 48 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Nov 21, 2025Standard7 findings
- Aug 12, 2024Standard2 findings
- Mar 9, 2023Standard and complaint6 findings
- Jul 9, 2021Standard3 findings
- Mar 19, 2020Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 12, 2019Standard6 findings
- Jul 11, 2018Standard3 findings
- May 27, 2016Standard5 findings
Show the 6 earlier surveys
- Jul 22, 2015Standard1 finding
- Feb 4, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Sep 4, 2014Standard7 findings · 1 harm
- May 10, 2013—1 finding
- Mar 15, 2012—3 findings
- Jan 6, 2011—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction