Stanley Healthcare Center
Westminster, California · CCN 555651
23 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2023.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 216
- Surveys
- 23
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 30
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- PROGRESSIVE HEALTH CARE CENTERS
- County
- Orange
- Medicare-certified since
- 1995
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 252 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in California.
Last survey on record
Apr 9, 2026
214 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.05 | 4.36 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.33 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 55.6% | 36.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D4367.2% | E812.5% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B1320.3% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8804×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6953×
Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
- F7003×
Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
- F7553×
Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
- F7563×
Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Stanley Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF692May 5, 2023
Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of 14 final sampled residents (Resident 1) received the appropriate services needed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status when: 1. The facility failed to implement the interventions to maintain Resident 1's nutritional status when Resident 1 experienced the following insidious weight loss (gradual, unintended, progressive weight loss over time): - 4 lbs, (3%) from 12/2/22 to 1/4/23, - 10 lbs (7%) from 10/3/22 to 1/4/23, and - 12 lbs (8%) from 8/5/22 to 1/4/22. 2. The facility failed to ensure the nutrition evaluations were performed by a qualified Registered Dietitian. 3. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF725Apr 9, 2026
Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility P&P review, facility document review, and the California Code of Regulations review, the facility failed to ensure a staff member was onsite during the evening and night shift, who could provide the respiratory services to the residents, in accordance with the residents' plan of care. * For the past year, on the evening and night shift, the facility failed to ensure a staff member was on site at the facility, who could provide respiratory services to the residents with oxygen titration orders. These failures had the potential to result in negative health outcomes for the residents. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Apr 9, 2026
Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the sanitary requirements were met in the kitchen for 27 of 27 residents who consumed food prepared in the kitchen. * The facility failed to ensure the sanitary condition of the hood over the stove was maintained. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchen utensils had a smooth cleanable surface and in good condition. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchenware and kitchen utensils were clean and free of food particle or residue. * The facility failed to ensure the cutting boards were kept in a sanitary condition and with cleanable surface. * Unlabeled and undated white powder was observed stored inside a plastic measuring cup on the countertop shelf. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Apr 9, 2026
Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to implement their infection control program in accordance with the facility's P&P. * The facility failed to implement their infection control surveillance program for the months of May 2025 through February 2026. The facility conducted surveillance of the resident's infections only when the residents were prescribed antimicrobial medications and/or if the residents were diagnosed with an infection. The facility failed to determine whether the residents who exhibited the signs and symptoms of infection and were not prescribed antimicrobial medications met the facility's criteria for infection (utilizing McGeer's Criteria). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Mar 6, 2025
Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the sanitary requirements were met in the kitchen as evidenced by: * The facility failed to ensure the microwave utilized to warm up the food was maintained in sanitary condition and free of food residue. * The facility failed to ensure the sanitary condition of the hood over the stove was maintained. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchen utensils had a smooth cleanable surface and in good condition. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchenware and kitchen utensils were clean and free of food particle or residue. […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 216 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 9, 2026Standard17 findings
- Feb 5, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jun 25, 2025Complaint1 finding
- May 29, 2025Complaint1 finding
- May 16, 2025Complaint4 findings
- Mar 6, 2025Standard18 findings
- Apr 23, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Mar 14, 2024Standard21 findings
Show the 15 earlier surveys
- May 5, 2023Standard22 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 24, 2020Standard6 findings
- Apr 3, 2019Standard12 findings
- May 15, 2018Standard13 findings
- Apr 10, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Jun 8, 2017Standard17 findings
- May 26, 2017Complaint3 findings
- Jun 24, 2016Standard14 findings
- Nov 23, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Jul 13, 2015Standard12 findings
- Jul 2, 2014Standard10 findings
- Dec 26, 2013—1 finding
- Jul 22, 2013—13 findings
- Sep 27, 2012—10 findings
- Dec 16, 2011—16 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction