Parkview Healthcare Center

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Parkview Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF882Apr 10, 2024

  Based on interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the IP had the knowledge of the Pneumococcal immunization update per the CDC's guidelines. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the IP had the appropriate knowledge to implement the enhanced barrier precautions with the facility's residents needed to be placed on a special precautions. These failures had the potential for the residents not to receive timely the appropriate type of pneumonia immunization placing the residents at risk for developing pneumonia (infection of the lungs that causes inflammation of air sacs in one or both lungs which may fill with fluid), and potential for spread of infection. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF883Apr 10, 2024

  Based on interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to offer PCV 15/PCV 20 (PCV 15 protects against two additional serotypes and PCV 20 protects against seven additional serotypes involved in cases of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) and pneumonia) immunizations for 20 of 20 nonsampled residents (Residents 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 13, 15, 16, 18, 19, 21, 23, 24, 25, 27, 29, 30, 31, and 33) reviewed for pneumococcal vaccination (a vaccine given to protect the resident from pneumococcal disease) in accordance with the CDC's recommendations. No tracking system was in place for pneumococcal vaccine history. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF803Jun 5, 2026

  Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the regular posted menu reflected the residents' food preferences for one of 14 final sampled residents (Resident 2) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 32). * Resident 2 and 32's food preferences were not honored. In addition, there was no alternate menu and posted for the residents who preferred Hispanic food. These failures had the potential to result in decreased meal satisfaction, reduced meal intake, unintended weight loss, and a negative impact on residents' psychosocial well being.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Menus dated October 2017 showed menus are developed and prepared to meet resident choices including religious, cultural and ethnic needs while… […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF806Jun 5, 2026

  Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the food preferences were honored for one of 14 final sampled residents ( Resident 2) and three of seven nonsampled residents (Resident 29, 18, and 30). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 2's food preferences were honored when he stated he did not want to receive only Hispanic food; however, he continued to be served Hispanic food. * The facility failed to ensure food preferences for Residents 18, 29, and 30 were honored when they all preferred to have Mexican food. These failures had the potential for decreased meal intake, weight loss, and a negative impact on the residents' psychosocial wellbeing.Findings: 1. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Jun 5, 2026

  Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the sanitary requirements were met in the kitchen (30 out of 35 residents were receiving food prepared in the kitchen). * The facility failed to ensure food preparation equipment was air dried. * The facility failed to ensure the safe storage of food items. * The facility failed to ensure kitchen equipment was maintained in a sanitary condition. * The facility failed to ensure appropriate beard restraint was worn by an outside vendor technician inside the kitchen. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses in a medically vulnerable resident population who consumed food prepared in the kitchen. […]