Deficiency Index

St Luke's Regional Medical Center SNF

Sioux City, Iowa · CCN 165620

3 surveys since 2018, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
9
Surveys
3
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2018–2024
’18’20’24
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file2/3

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
20
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Woodbury
Medicare-certified since
2017
Ownership changed
In the last 12 months

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
4
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=3, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jan 18, 2024

1,026 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day10.853.76
Registered-nurse hours per resident day3.32—

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD133.3%E—F266.7%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 3 of the 9 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at St Luke's Regional Medical Center SNF, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF847Jan 18, 2024

    Based on record review, staff and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure a binding arbitration agreement consisted of key factors necessary for compliance for 8 of 8 residents in the facility (Resident #1, #2. #3, #4, #107, #108, #109, and #111). Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] Resident #2 scored 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating no cognitive impairment. The resident's record contained a signed Admission Agreement which included an Arbitration Agreement on page 11 and the resident's signature on page 17. On 1/17/24 at 3:31 p.m. Resident # 2 stated she signed so much she doesn't remember what she signed. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF848Jan 18, 2024

    Based on record review, staff and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure a binding arbitration agreement consisted of key factors necessary for compliance for 8 of 8 residents in the facility (Resident #1, #2. #3, #4, #107, #108, #109, and #111). Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] Resident #2 scored 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating no cognitive impairment. The resident's record contained a signed Admission Agreement which included an Arbitration Agreement on page 11 and the resident's signature on page 17. On 1/17/24 at 3:31 p.m. Resident # 2 stated she signed so much she doesn't remember what she signed. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF880Jan 18, 2024

    Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to provide follow infection prevention practices when providing personal care, catheter care, and wound care 2 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #3 and #111). While completing wound management and incontinence care, the facility failed to complete hand hygiene between gloves and failed to keep clean items clean. While providing care, the staff failed to use clean hands to get clean wash cloths for incontinence. Findings include: 1. Resident #3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. […]

Read all 9 findings in full →

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jan 18, 2024Standard3 findings
  • Jan 23, 2020Standard3 findings
  • Nov 20, 2018Standard3 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction