Mayflower Home
Grinnell, Iowa · CCN 165481
19 surveys since 2011, 1 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 43
- Surveys
- 19
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 40
- Ownership
- Non profit - Church related
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Poweshiek · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 2003
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=8, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Jul 9, 2026
123 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.65 | 3.76 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.18 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 40.5% | 40.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D685.7% | E114.3% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F5502×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F6582×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F5801×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
- F6841×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F7271×
Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Mayflower Home, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF727Jul 11, 2024
Based on daily staffing sheets, punch detail, policy review and staff interviews, the facility failed to have 8 hours Registered Nurse (RN) coverage. The facility reported a census of 28 residents. Findings include: The Daily Healthcare (HC) Schedule, dated 6/16/24, revealed Staff B, Registered Nurse, worked the night shift on 6/16/24. The review of the facility punch detail reflected on 6/16/24 Staff B clocked in at 10:07 PM and clocked out 6/17/24 at 6:37 AM. The facility couldn't provide additional information including Daily HC schedules or punch detail regarding RN coverage on 6/16/24. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF580Jul 9, 2026
Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the provider of abnormal blood sugars and of a weight loss for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for high risk medications(Resident #20). The facility reported a census of 31 residents. Findings included:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 6/17/26, listed diagnoses for Resident #20 which included diabetes (a disease which caused abnormal blood sugars), heart failure, and high blood pressure and listed her Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 9 out of 15, indicating moderately impaired cognition. a. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF550Apr 9, 2026
Based on clinical record review, written resident statement, resident interviews, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for dignity (Residents #1 and Resident #9). The facility reported a census of 27 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/9/26, documented Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. The MDS reflected the resident had diagnoses to include progressive neurological conditions, Parkinson's disease and anxiety disorder. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF658May 29, 2025
Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident #32). The facility reported a census of 31 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set assessment tool, dated 5/16/25, listed diagnoses for Resident #32 which included heart failure, diabetes, and obesity. The MDS listed the Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) score as 14 out of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented the resident had 1 unhealed pressure ulcer. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684May 29, 2025
Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to assess, intervene, and notify the physician as directed to ensure bowel regularity for 3 of 4 residents (Residents #2, #18, and #21) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 31 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 3/21/25, for Resident #2 revealed a list of diagnoses which included a seizure disorder, depression, and severe obesity. The MDS listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 14 out of 15, which indicated intact cognition. Review of the Bowel Elimination Report revealed a lack of documentation to indicate if Resident #2 had a bowel movement from 5/20/25 to 5/28/25. […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 43 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 9, 2026Standard1 finding
- Apr 9, 2026Complaint1 finding
- May 29, 2025Standard2 findings
- Jul 11, 2024Standard3 findings
- Dec 22, 2021Standard1 finding
- Nov 14, 2019Standard5 findings
- Oct 4, 2018Standard and complaint1 finding
- Aug 3, 2017Standard and complaint6 findings
Show the 11 earlier surveys
- Aug 4, 2016Standard and complaint3 findings
- Oct 1, 2015Standard and complaint1 finding
- Mar 20, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Aug 21, 2014Standard2 findings
- Jul 21, 2014Complaint1 finding
- May 30, 2013—2 findings
- Mar 29, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
- Jan 31, 2013—2 findings
- Apr 26, 2012—1 finding
- Apr 14, 2011—5 findings
- Apr 7, 2011—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction