Deficiency Index

St Johnsville Rehabilitation and Nursing Center

Saint Johnsville, New York · CCN 335704

20 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
87
Surveys
20
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file17/20

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
120
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Montgomery · rural
Medicare-certified since
1989

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
3
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 79 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in New York.

Last survey on record

Sep 3, 2025

432 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.823.37
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.40—
Annual nurse turnover50.9%47.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD939.1%E1356.5%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C14.3%
CMS’s current file: 23 of the 87 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F8802×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5501×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F5541×

    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at St Johnsville Rehabilitation and Nursing Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF550Sep 3, 2025

    Based on observations, record review and interviews conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure each resident was treated with respect and dignity and care in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life for two (2) (Resident #s 11 and 86) of 24 residents reviewed. Specifically, (a.) Resident #11 foley's catheter bag was exposed; (b.) Resident #86 heard Certified Nurse Aide #1 and Certified Nurse Aide #2 stated they had to wait and be the last one for care because they were so slow. Certified Nurse Aide #2 when asked to remove a raised toilet seat before Resident #86 used the bathroom, they replied, 'no, I am not breaking my back.' Resident #86 stated in both instances they were offended. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF692Sep 3, 2025

    Based on record review and staff interviews conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that it maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status, provided nutrition care and services to each resident consistent with the resident's comprehensive assessment for three (3) (Resident #s 6, 48, and 107) of seven (7) residents reviewed for nutrition/hydration status maintenance. Specifically, (a.) Resident #6 had a documented weight loss of 17.7 pounds in a month, (b) Resident #48 had a documented weight gain of 22.5 pounds in a month, and (c) Resident #107 had a documented weight loss of 35.6 pounds. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF725Sep 3, 2025

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during a recertification and abbreviated survey (Case # 2562681), the facility did not ensure the provision of sufficient nursing staff to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident throughout the facility. Specifically, residents reported that staff would not be able to provide them care for extended periods of time. Review of the actual staffing schedule revealed that on multiple occasions from 08/11/2025 to 09/01/2025, the facility staffing levels were below the facility assessment. This is evidenced by: The Facility Assessment, last reviewed in July 2025, documented that the facility's bed capacity was 120. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF732Sep 3, 2025

    Based on observations and interview conducted during the recertification survey, it was determined that the facility did not post nurse staffing information in an area accessible to all residents and visitors, as required by the posting requirements. Specifically, the posting of daily nurse staffing levels for staff working in the facility on each shift from 08/25/2025 through 09/03/2025 was located at the far end of the building. This is evidenced by: During observations from 8/25/2025 through 9/03/2025, the daily nurse staffing postings were located in a hallway at the far end of the building near the human resources office, which was not readily visible or accessible to all residents and visitors. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF759Sep 3, 2025

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that its medication error rate did not exceed five (5) percent for two (2) (Resident #s and 46) of two (2) residents observed during medication administration with 25 observations. This resulted in a medication error rate of 88 percent.This is evidenced by:The facility ' s Policy and Procedure titled, Medication Nurse Routine. Revised: 12/19/2024, documented all Medication Nurse duties are performed by licensed personnel. Procedures will be performed as follows by all staff uniformly. During the medication pass read orders from electronic medical record, Compare prescription label on blister pack to medication order. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 87 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Sep 3, 2025Standard and complaint12 findings
  • Dec 20, 2022Complaint3 findings
  • Jul 22, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 19, 2022Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Sep 7, 2021Infection control2 findings
  • Aug 24, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 10, 2020Standard6 findings
  • Oct 10, 2018Standard8 findings
Show the 12 earlier surveys
  • Jan 12, 2017Standard8 findings
  • Feb 3, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 22, 2015Standard1 finding
  • Nov 17, 2014Complaint4 findings
  • Sep 18, 2014Standard5 findings
  • Mar 19, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 30, 2013—8 findings
  • Sep 19, 2012—3 findings
  • May 9, 2012—2 findings
  • Mar 21, 2012—1 finding
  • Aug 3, 2011—9 findings
  • Feb 9, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction