Deficiency Index

St James House of Baytown

Baytown, Texas · CCN 675999

33 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2015.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
121
Surveys
33
Harm or worse
13
Immediate jeopardy
12
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy12

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file27/33

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
105
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Harris
Medicare-certified since
2004

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
2
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 377 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Texas.

Last survey on record

Mar 26, 2026

228 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.883.25
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.39—
Annual nurse turnover46.3%54.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$14,901 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ110.0%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD440.0%E440.0%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C110.0%
CMS’s current file: 10 of the 121 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at St James House of Baytown, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF580Jan 10, 2025

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to immediately inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician, and notify consistent with his or her authority, the resident representative when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status and a need to alter treatment significantly for 1 of 5 residents (CR#1) reviewed for physician notification. The facility failed to contact the physician for over 5 hours when CR#1 had shortness of breath and was gurgling. After approximately 5 hours, CR #1 was sent to the hospital via emergency transport and was admitted with Pneumonia, Acute Kidney Failure, and Septic Shock and expired 2 days later. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on [DATE]. […]

  • Actual harm, patternF760Mar 18, 2022

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 7 of 7 residents (Resident #4, Resident 17, Resident #55, Resident #59, Resident #64, Resident #91, Resident #345) reviewed for quality of care. - The facility failed to set orders and to ensure that pre-prandial insulin, (insulin that should be administered within 5-20 minutes before meals) was administered at 6 AM, 2 hours before the breakfast meal for Resident #4 and Resident #64. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Mar 18, 2022

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of one kitchen, one standalone refrigerator, one walk in refrigerator, for reviewed for kitchen sanitation and storage. -The facility failed to ensure that open food and leftovers in the stand-alone refrigerator and walk in refrigerator were labeled, dated, and sealed. - Boxes of food items were observed on the floor outside of the freezer and in dry goods storage. - Boxes in walk-in freezer were crowded with no space for air circulation. - Food was not dated with an open date. - Two male staff did not wear beard and hair restraint. - Two staff did not wear PPE (mask) appropriately. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jun 18, 2021

    Based on observation, interview and record review, and interview the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of one kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation and storage. -The facility failed to ensure that open food and leftovers in the stand-alone refrigerator and the walk-in refrigerator were labeled, dated, and sealed. -The facility failed to clean dirt, debris and dead bugs directly next to a preparation table. - The facility failed to discard of opened food items according to facility policy. - The facility failed to keep the kitchen free from bugs. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF760Aug 20, 2025

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from any significant medication errors for 1 (Resident #88) of 4 residents reviewed for pharmacy services.-The facility failed to ensure Losartan (a blood pressure (BP) medication given to lower high blood pressure and help protect the kidneys) was administered to Resident #88 per physician order from [DATE] through [DATE]. -The facility failed to ensure accurate reconciliation (a process of comparing and verifying a resident's current list of medications with all prescribed medications to ensure accuracy and safety), of Resident #88's Losartan medication. […]

Read 31 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 31 of 121 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 26, 2026Complaint3 findings
  • Aug 20, 2025Standard2 findings
  • Jan 10, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Oct 9, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 27, 2024Standard1 finding
  • May 12, 2023Standard2 findings
  • Mar 8, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 18, 2022Standard11 findings · 1 harm
Show the 25 earlier surveys
  • Jun 18, 2021Standard8 findings
  • Sep 23, 2020Complaint3 findings
  • Mar 6, 2020Standard and complaint4 findings
  • May 10, 2019Standard5 findings
  • Jun 7, 2018Standard7 findings
  • Mar 13, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 7, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 20, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • May 12, 2017Standard8 findings
  • Feb 28, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 10, 2016Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Mar 1, 2016Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Aug 21, 2015Complaint5 findings · 5 harm
  • May 27, 2015Standard and complaint8 findings · 4 harm
  • Sep 18, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 3, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 17, 2014Standard7 findings
  • Apr 11, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 10, 2013—1 finding
  • May 16, 2013—8 findings
  • Oct 3, 2012—1 finding
  • Jun 14, 2012—10 findings
  • Mar 8, 2012—1 finding
  • Dec 8, 2011—1 finding
  • May 12, 2011—9 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction