Springhurst Health Campus
Greenfield, Indiana · CCN 155767
17 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2017.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 77
- Surveys
- 17
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 74
- Ownership
- Government - County
- Chain
- TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES
- County
- Hancock
- Medicare-certified since
- 2008
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 38 government-run facilities of 66–99 beds in Indiana.
Last survey on record
Mar 23, 2026
231 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.30 | 3.52 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.06 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 38.7% | 41.2% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $21,645 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J14.0% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2288.0% | E14.0% | F14.0% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6773×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
- F5502×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F6842×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F7552×
Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
- F5581×
Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Springhurst Health Campus, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF755Mar 23, 2026
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to correctly transcribe the hospital's discharge orders for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accuracy of physician orders for a newly admitted resident. This deficient practice resulted in a resident not having a diagnosis of diabetes identified and not receiving his hospital discharged ordered insulin for five (5) days, which contributed to the resident having elevated (high) blood glucose, diminished cognitive levels, lethargy and being sent out to the local hospital. The resident was sent out to the local hospital on 2-13-26, at the request of the family. He was subsequently admitted to the local hospital the same date for altered mental status, possibly related to dehydration, infection or diabetic ketoacidosis. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF725Jun 17, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff to provide activities of daily living (ADL) care, skin care treatments, and maintain residents' dignity. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 61 of 61 residents in the facility. Findings include: A confidential interview was conducted with a resident. They indicated there were not enough staff in the facility to help them. They forgot about them when they pressed their call light, and it made them feel unimportant. An interview was conducted with Resident P on 6/10/25 at 1:23 p.m. She indicated it took thirty minutes for staff to help her, after she pressed her call light. An interview was conducted with Resident S on 6/11/25 at 11:27 a.m. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF677Jun 17, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assist dependent residents with shaving per preference and provide activities of daily living (ADL) care in a timely manner for 4 of 7 residents reviewed for activities of daily living. (Resident E, Resident G, Resident L, and Resident J) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident E was reviewed on 6/16/2025 at 1:20 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, urinary tract infection and depression. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/14/2025, indicated Resident E was cognitively intact, utilized an indwelling urinary catheter, and needed substantial/maximal assistance with toileting hygiene, upper and lower body dressing, and personal hygiene. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF550Jun 17, 2025
2. The clinical record for Resident F was reviewed on 6/11/25 at 10:30 a.m. His diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease. An interview was conducted with Family Member 4 on 6/11/25 at 10:38 a.m. She indicated there was an incident involving Resident F and CRCA (Certified Resident Care Assistant) 15 in March 2025 in his room. Resident F had bowel issues. It wasn't a happy situation, and CRCA 16 had to clean it up. CRCA 16 said it was gross right in front of him. They filed a grievance about it. Family Member 4 received a call back afterwards, stating the facility would be doing more staff training. The grievance log for the past six months was provided by Clinical Support on 6/12/25 at 10:48 a.m. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF558Jun 17, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was within reach for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for call light accessibility. (Resident 218) Findings include: During an observation and interview with Resident 218 on 6/11/25 at 9:59 a.m., Resident 218 was sitting in a wheelchair in the middle of her room. The call light was on the other side of the room on the floor beside her bed. Resident 218 indicated when staff would get her up during the day, she could never reach her call light and had no way of contacting staff when she needed help. […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 77 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Mar 23, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jun 17, 2025Standard and complaint10 findings
- Apr 30, 2024Standard2 findings
- Feb 27, 2023Standard12 findings
- Feb 5, 2020Standard2 findings
- Jan 9, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Feb 8, 2019Standard1 finding
- Apr 16, 2018Complaint1 finding
Show the 9 earlier surveys
- Dec 12, 2017Standard and complaint7 findings
- Jul 25, 2017Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 20, 2016Standard4 findings
- Jul 7, 2016Complaint4 findings
- Aug 4, 2015Standard7 findings
- Aug 28, 2014Standard8 findings
- Jun 14, 2013—6 findings
- Jun 5, 2012—1 finding
- Mar 4, 2011—5 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction