Deficiency Index

Spring Valley Health and Rehab Center

Spring Valley, Wisconsin · CCN 525466

20 surveys since 2011, 10 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
138
Surveys
20
Harm or worse
10
Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
4
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy4

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file14/20

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
40
Ownership
Government - City/county
Chain
HEALTH DIMENSIONS GROUP
County
Pierce
Medicare-certified since
1990

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
2
Staffing
3
Quality measures
1

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 18 government-run facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Wisconsin.

Last survey on record

Dec 4, 2025

340 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.994.41
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.66—
Annual nurse turnover64.4%35.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$27,690 across 2 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ12.6%K—L—
Actual harmG12.6%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2257.9%E37.9%F1026.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C12.6%
CMS’s current file: 38 of the 138 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6072×

    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.

  • F6102×

    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Spring Valley Health and Rehab Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Apr 25, 2024

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from sexual abuse. The facility did not implement interventions to protect residents (R) from sexual abuse by a resident. Not implementing interventions affected 1 of 2 residents (R1) reviewed for sexual abuse. *On 03/28/24, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) found R2 in R1's room. R2 was shirtless and zipping and buttoning R2's pants while in R1's bed. R1, who is cognitively impaired, stood in the middle of the room with a T-shirt and no pants. The facility did not implement appropriate interventions to prevent a second occurrence of sexual abuse from occurring. *On 04/01/24, a CNA found R2 in R1's room. R1 was in bed on R1's back. R2 was lying with R2's head next to R1's feet. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF580Jun 21, 2022

    Based on record review and interview, the facility did not immediately consult with the physician for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for a significant change in condition (R1). The facility did not immediately consult with R1's physician after R1 sustained a fall causing a change in condition to his right foot. This fall resulted in the resident's foot hanging on by one (or possibly two) tendon(s). There is no evidence that staff, who were expecting the foot to fall off at any time, consulted with the physician about this or sought medical direction for continued care. The facility did not consult with the physician after the tendon was cut to inform the physician what had been done. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF684Jun 21, 2022

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not provide care consistent with professional standards of practice and with the resident's wishes for care and treatment for 1 of 2 Residents reviewed (R1) who experienced a significant change in condition. R1 was admitted with frostbitten feet that were in need of treatment. R1 did not have weekly assessments to include measurements and the condition of the affected feet. When R1 fell on [DATE], R1's foot became mostly detached. Nursing did not consult with the physician about this change. On 05/27/22, a Registered Nurse (RN) worked outside her scope of practice and cut the remaining tendons to amputate the foot. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF849Jun 21, 2022

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure hospice collaboration and communication processes were established to ensure continuity of care between hospice and the facility for 1 of 2 hospice residents (R1). R1's plan of care was not coordinated and communicated adequately between the facility and hospice regarding R1's ongoing foot condition or when R1's foot was removed by an RN. The facility did not develop a communication plan that included how communication would be provided and documented between the facility and hospice to ensure the needs of the resident were addressed and met. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Aug 1, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the residents' environment remains as free of accident hazards as possible. Two of four residents (R) reviewed for falls with history of falls (R26 and R31) did not have post fall assessments, care plan interventions updated after falls, and had subsequent falls with major injuries. R26 and R31 are being cited at actual harm. R6 and R2 did not have post fall assessments and care plan updates after falls. One resident (R14) did not have a safety assessment or care plan for leaving facility campus and traveling on a busy highway with power wheelchair. […]

Read 29 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 29 of 138 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Dec 4, 2025Standard and complaint13 findings
  • Aug 8, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 1, 2024Standard8 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 25, 2024Complaint7 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 11, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 21, 2023Standard8 findings
  • Mar 21, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 21, 2022Complaint5 findings · 3 harm
Show the 12 earlier surveys
  • May 4, 2022Standard8 findings
  • Oct 13, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 24, 2021Standard and complaint11 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 13, 2019Standard9 findings
  • Feb 8, 2018Standard4 findings
  • Mar 9, 2017Standard5 findings
  • Mar 28, 2016Standard8 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 2, 2015Standard8 findings
  • May 6, 2014Standard19 findings · 2 harm
  • Jul 10, 2013—10 findings
  • Jul 12, 2012—9 findings · 1 harm
  • May 5, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction