Deficiency Index

Spencer Post Acute Rehabilitation Center

Spencer, Iowa · CCN 165449

27 surveys since 2011, 8 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
116
Surveys
27
Harm or worse
8
Immediate jeopardy
3
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy3

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. 1 of these were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file19/27

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
82
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
THE ENSIGN GROUP
County
Clay · rural
Medicare-certified since
2002

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
2
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 56 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Iowa.

Last survey on record

Jun 4, 2026

158 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.383.54
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.55—

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$24,706 across 2 penalties
Payment denials
1

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ24.3%K—L—
Actual harmG12.2%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2656.5%E1737.0%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 46 of the 116 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8804×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6563×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F6582×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F6772×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Spencer Post Acute Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF880Sep 14, 2021

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish adequate measures to mitigate the spread of the Covid-19 virus. In the Northshire building, residents that tested positive for Covid-19 were not separated from the population that was still testing negative. A plastic barrier was taped on to the door frames of those that were positive but the negative residents continued to remain in their rooms and doors were left open. The findings constituted an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) to resident health and safety. The facility reported a census of 64 residents. Findings include: According to a Report of Covid-19 positive cases provided by the Administrator, on 8/19/21 a staff person tested positive and the first positive resident case was on 8/24/21. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF678May 20, 2024

    Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, personnel records and facility policy review on [DATE] the facility staff failed to implement CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) for one of five residents sampled (Resident #1), who was found unresponsive with no pulse or respirations and desired CPR. This resulted in immediate jeopardy to the residents health and safety. The facility identified a census of 53 current residents, 13 of which were identified by the facility with a request for CPR at the time of cardiopulmonary or respiratory arrest. The facility was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) and given the IJ template on [DATE] at 12:15 PM. The immediacy had been removed on [DATE] when the facility provided staff education and review of their policy. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF760Oct 30, 2023

    Based on document review, observation, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to protect a resident from a significant medication error. A nurse committed to giving 37 units of Aspart insulin (Novolog) to Resident #47 at 9:45 AM after drawing it up from a vial, then put the vial back into the medication cart. Resident #47 has an order that reads Levemir Subcutaneous Solution 100 UNIT/ML inject 37 units subcutaneously in the morning for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #47). The State Agency informed the facility of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began as of October 25, 2023 on October 25th, 2023 at 4:40 P.M. The Facility Staff removed the Immediate Jeopardy on October 26, 2023 through the following actions: a. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684Jun 4, 2026

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide adequate assessment and timely intervention to assure 2 of 3 residents (Resident #1 and #2) received prompt treatment for a change in condition. Resident #1 had urinary tract infection (UTI) symptoms on the weekend of 5/16-17/26 and the facility failed to notify the physician or initiate any other interventions related to the symptoms. Resident #1 had difficulty catching her breath after the evening meal on [DATE] and needed staff to intervene for the resident to clear it. According to the clinical record the resident sat where she could be observed for a half hour and then went to bed. The clinical record lacked documentation the staff monitored her after going to bed. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF628Aug 14, 2025

    Based on clinical record review, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure bed hold notice was signed by residents and or the resident's responsible person when residents transferred out of the facility for 4 of 4 residents reviewed (Residents #2, #4, #5 and #9). The facility reported a census of 67 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #4 documented reentry to the facility on 2/20/25 for a short term hospital stay. Review of the Clinical Census report for Resident #4 revealed the following information:a. 11/25/24- hospital leaveb. 12/3/24- activec. 2/9/25- hospital d. 2/11/25- active Review of the Progress Notes for Resident #4 revealed the following:a. […]

Read 27 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 27 of 116 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 4, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Mar 30, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 14, 2025Standard14 findings
  • Aug 22, 2024Standard12 findings
  • May 20, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Mar 14, 2024Complaint3 findings
  • Oct 30, 2023Standard13 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 12, 2023Complaint1 finding
Show the 19 earlier surveys
  • Apr 7, 2022Standard7 findings
  • Sep 14, 2021Infection control1 finding · 1 harm
  • Feb 4, 2021Standard3 findings
  • Feb 14, 2019Standard11 findings
  • Nov 2, 2017Standard1 finding
  • Oct 19, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 22, 2016Standard8 findings
  • Mar 30, 2016Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 6, 2015Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Oct 8, 2015Standard8 findings
  • Sep 3, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 10, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 11, 2014Standard and complaint2 findings
  • Sep 19, 2013—7 findings
  • Aug 30, 2013—1 finding
  • Jul 2, 2013—1 finding
  • May 9, 2013—3 findings · 1 harm
  • May 16, 2012—1 finding
  • Jul 15, 2011—9 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction