Somerset Nursing and Rehabilitation Facility
Somerset, Kentucky · CCN 185218
21 surveys since 2011, 25 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 103
- Surveys
- 21
- Harm or worse
- 25
- Immediate jeopardy
- 8
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 123
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- BLUEGRASS HEALTH KY
- County
- Pulaski · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1990
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=17, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Apr 17, 2026
206 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.73 | 3.59 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.29 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 45.7% | 45.6% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G421.1% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D736.8% | E736.8% | F15.3% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6772×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
- F5571×
Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
- F5581×
Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
- F5731×
Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Somerset Nursing and Rehabilitation Facility, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF656Apr 17, 2026
Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policies, the facility failed to implement the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident (R)1). The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plan Policy, reviewed on [DATE], revealed the facility would develop and implement a person-centered care plan for each resident to include measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs as identified in the comprehensive assessment. Continued review of the facility's policy revealed each resident's Comprehensive Care Plan was designed to incorporate identified problem areas and risk factors associated with the identified problems. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Apr 17, 2026
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policies, the facility failed to provide each resident with adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident (R)1). R1 sustained a fall with a fracture. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Falls Policy, reviewed [DATE], revealed the policy was to ensure the facility provided an environment as free from accident hazards as possible, over which the facility had control to prevent avoidable falls/accidents. Review of R1's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on [DATE], with diagnoses of osteoporosis, presence of right artificial hip joint, and dementia. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF657Feb 3, 2021
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, it was determined the facility failed to review/revise the comprehensive care plan for two (2) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #6 and Resident #8). Review of Resident #8's record revealed on 12/14/2020, a cancerous lesion was removed from the resident's scalp. Staff instructions included not removing the dressing and the resident was to return to the physician three (3) days later. However, the resident was not able to keep that appointment and the facility rescheduled the appointment for 12/23/2020 (9 days after the procedure). The facility failed to obtain any further orders related to the wound and failed review/revise the care plan to reflect the delayed treatment. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Feb 3, 2021
Based on observation, interview, record review, review of facility policy, and review of information from the Cleveland Clinic and woundsource.com, it was determined the facility failed to provide necessary care and services, in accordance with professional standards of practice and facility policy for one (2) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #8 and Resident #6). Review of Resident #8's record indicated Physician #1 removed a cancerous lesion from the resident's scalp, as an outpatient procedure on 12/14/2020. According to the record, staff were instructed not to remove the surgical dressing, and the resident was instructed to return to the physician's office on 12/17/2020 for a follow up appointment. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF838Aug 11, 2021
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to review and update the facility assessment when there was a change in facility administration and failed to address the facility's resident population with regards to a resident with bariatric needs. (Refer to F558) The findings included: Review of the Facility Assessment Tool revealed the date of the assessment was 12/07/2020. The assessment did not have the name of the current Administrator or current Director of Nursing (DON) listed as persons who were involved in completing the assessment. Further review of the assessment revealed the section titled Our Resident Profile did not include residents with bariatric needs. […]
Read 41 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 41 of 103 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 17, 2026Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Sep 29, 2022Complaint3 findings
- Aug 11, 2021Standard and complaint7 findings
- Mar 18, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Feb 3, 2021Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
- Dec 9, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Sep 16, 2020Infection control2 findings
- Dec 20, 2019Complaint8 findings · 2 harm
Show the 13 earlier surveys
- Nov 16, 2019Standard17 findings · 4 harm
- Sep 6, 2019Complaint20 findings · 10 harm
- Nov 8, 2018Standard and complaint4 findings · 3 harm
- Sep 21, 2017Standard6 findings
- Nov 21, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Aug 4, 2016Standard6 findings
- Jul 9, 2015Standard2 findings
- May 15, 2014Standard1 finding
- Jun 6, 2013—5 findings
- Apr 12, 2012—4 findings
- Nov 23, 2011—2 findings · 2 harm
- Mar 3, 2011—6 findings
- Feb 15, 2011—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Signature Healthcare at Summit Manor Rehab & WellnColumbia3 harm findings
- Fair Oaks Health and RehabilitationJamestown2 harm findings
- Parkwood Health & RehabilitationLouisville1 harm finding
- Regency Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterLouisvile2 harm findings
- Lexington Country PlaceLexington3 harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction