Fair Oaks Health and Rehabilitation
Jamestown, Kentucky · CCN 185286
20 surveys since 2011, 20 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 90
- Surveys
- 20
- Harm or worse
- 20
- Immediate jeopardy
- 14
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 114
- Ownership
- For profit - Individual
- Chain
- SIMCHA HYMAN & NAFTALI ZANZIPER
- County
- Russell · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1991
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 64 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Kentucky.
Last survey on record
Apr 17, 2025
571 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.06 | 3.59 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.47 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 39.1% | 45.6% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D375.0% | E125.0% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Fair Oaks Health and Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF656Jan 5, 2022
Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy, it was determined the facility failed to implement the plan of care for one (1) of thirteen (13) sampled resident's, Resident #1. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed the resident had been care planned for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) which included an intervention for staff to use a mechanical lift with a small sling for his/her transfer needs. However, on 11/15/2021 staff utilized a mechanical lift and transferred Resident #1 from the bed to a reclined geri-chair (medical chair that reclines), which staff failed to lock in place. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Jan 5, 2022
Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment remained as free from accident hazards as possible and residents received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents, Resident #1, who were transferred with a mechanical lift out of a total sample of thirteen (13) residents. On 11/15/2021, staff used a mechanical lift to transfer Resident #1 from the bed to a reclined geri-chair (specialized reclining chair). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF727Apr 30, 2026
Based on interview, and review of facility documentation, the facility failed to ensure the Director of Nursing (DON) was not assigned to work as a floor nurse when the facility had an average daily census of more than 60 residents, which had the potential to affect all residents in the facility.The findings include: In interview on 04/30/2026 at 12:15 PM, the Administrator stated the facility did not have a policy related to the DON working as a floor nurse when the average daily census was more than 60 residents. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF689May 11, 2022
Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy it was determined the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent resident to resident incidents for four (4) of eight (8) sampled residents, Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #5, and Resident #7. Review of Resident #1's medical record, and interviews with staff and Resident #7, revealed Resident #1 exhibited behaviors of wandering into other residents' rooms, making sexually inappropriate comments, getting into bed with another resident and touching other residents on their leg and buttock. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF600Jan 5, 2022
Based on observation, interview, record review, review of the facility's policy and investigations, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were protected from abuse for five (5) of thirteen (13) sampled residents (Resident #4, #5, #6, #7 and #8). Interview and record review revealed Resident #4 exhibited unpredictable aggressive behaviors towards other residents and staff and wandered in and out of other residents' rooms. However, the facility failed to implement effective interventions to prevent Resident #4 from displaying aggressive behaviors towards other residents, which resulted in four (4) resident to resident incidents between 06/02/2021 and 11/16/2021, a five (5) month timeframe. […]
Read 38 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 38 of 90 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 30, 2026Standard4 findings
- Apr 17, 2025Standard1 finding
- May 11, 2022Complaint9 findings
- Jan 5, 2022Complaint4 findings · 2 harm
- Oct 21, 2021Standard3 findings
- Feb 3, 2021Infection control1 finding
- Sep 4, 2020Complaint11 findings · 6 harm
- Jul 31, 2020Infection control1 finding
Show the 12 earlier surveys
- Nov 26, 2019Complaint9 findings · 3 harm
- Oct 31, 2018Complaint6 findings · 5 harm
- Feb 23, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Sep 22, 2016Standard3 findings
- Sep 14, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Aug 14, 2015Standard12 findings
- Apr 24, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Jul 24, 2014Standard1 finding
- Jul 18, 2013—3 findings
- Apr 24, 2012—8 findings
- Feb 23, 2012—2 findings · 2 harm
- Feb 16, 2011—9 findings · 2 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction