Solaris Healthcare Apopka
Apopka, Florida · CCN 105782
13 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 36
- Surveys
- 13
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 120
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- SOLARIS HEALTHCARE
- County
- Orange
- Medicare-certified since
- 1993
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=5, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Apr 6, 2023
1,313 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.72 | 3.57 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.65 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 27.8% | 44.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D375.0% | E125.0% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Solaris Healthcare Apopka, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF755May 6, 2021
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement procedures to ensure accurate narcotic reconciliation for 1 of 1 narcotic medication reviewed, and failed to ensure safe administration of medications for 6 of 19 residents of a total sample of 51 residents, (#2, #35, #48, #72, #77 and #108). Findings: On 05/05/21 at 6:34 PM, an inspection of the Arbor Oaks medication cart assigned to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A was conducted with the Arbor Unit Manager (UM). The Arbor UM opened the top left drawer of the medication cart and LPN A quickly returned to the cart and whispered to the Arbor UM who asked if the medication cart inspection could be completed at a later time. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF756Apr 6, 2023
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement medication regimen review (MRR) recommendations for medication administration parameters of physician's orders for 1 of 5 residents and failed to ensure MRRs were reviewed by the physician for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications from a total sample of 39 residents. (#8, #43) Findings: 1. Review of the medical record revealed resident #8 transferred from the facility to an acute care hospital on 7/20/2022, readmitted to the facility on [DATE], and transferred to an acute care hospital on 4/05/2023. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF760Jun 7, 2022
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for 1 of 9 sampled residents, (#3). Findings: Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . A review of the resident's medical record revealed [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Another physician order [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . [MEDICATION(S)] Solution is used to treat [CONDITION(S)] (low red blood cell count) in people with long-term serious kidney disease (chronic kidney failure), .(www.webmd). Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) from 5/11/22 to 6/06/22 revealed [MEDICATION(S)] Solution had not been administered to the resident. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684May 6, 2021
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide wound care treatment in accordance with physician's orders and acceptable standards of practice for two skin tears for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions of a total sample of 51 residents, (#28). Findings: Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review of the Minimum Data Set quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident #28 required extensive assistance from two staff for bed mobility, toilet use and personal hygiene. Review of the physician's order for resident #28 revealed an order for [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF761May 6, 2021
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the controlled medication compartment was properly secured on 1 of 6 medication carts, (Arbor Oak medication cart). Findings: On 5/05/21 at 6:34 PM, during an inspection of the Arbor Unit medication cart, the narcotic compartment labeled Oak was not securely locked. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A was easily able to lift the lid of the narcotic compartment with one finger without using his key. On 5/05/21 at 7:02 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated nurses should not rely on the drawer closure to lock and secure the narcotic compartment. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 36 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 6, 2023Standard1 finding
- Jun 7, 2022Complaint1 finding
- May 6, 2021Standard3 findings
- Oct 17, 2019Standard1 finding
- Aug 23, 2018Standard6 findings
- May 11, 2017Standard4 findings
- Jun 22, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Feb 12, 2016Standard6 findings
Show the 5 earlier surveys
- Jan 28, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Oct 30, 2014Standard3 findings
- Nov 15, 2013—1 finding
- Sep 14, 2012—5 findings
- Aug 11, 2011—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction