Deficiency Index

Solaris Healthcare Apopka

Apopka, Florida · CCN 105782

13 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
36
Surveys
13
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2023
’11’15’20’23
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file11/13

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
120
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
SOLARIS HEALTHCARE
County
Orange
Medicare-certified since
1993

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
4
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=5, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Apr 6, 2023

1,313 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.723.57
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.65—
Annual nurse turnover27.8%44.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD375.0%E125.0%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 4 of the 36 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Solaris Healthcare Apopka, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF755May 6, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement procedures to ensure accurate narcotic reconciliation for 1 of 1 narcotic medication reviewed, and failed to ensure safe administration of medications for 6 of 19 residents of a total sample of 51 residents, (#2, #35, #48, #72, #77 and #108). Findings: On 05/05/21 at 6:34 PM, an inspection of the Arbor Oaks medication cart assigned to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A was conducted with the Arbor Unit Manager (UM). The Arbor UM opened the top left drawer of the medication cart and LPN A quickly returned to the cart and whispered to the Arbor UM who asked if the medication cart inspection could be completed at a later time. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF756Apr 6, 2023

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement medication regimen review (MRR) recommendations for medication administration parameters of physician's orders for 1 of 5 residents and failed to ensure MRRs were reviewed by the physician for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications from a total sample of 39 residents. (#8, #43) Findings: 1. Review of the medical record revealed resident #8 transferred from the facility to an acute care hospital on 7/20/2022, readmitted to the facility on [DATE], and transferred to an acute care hospital on 4/05/2023. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF760Jun 7, 2022

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for 1 of 9 sampled residents, (#3). Findings: Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . A review of the resident's medical record revealed [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Another physician order [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . [MEDICATION(S)] Solution is used to treat [CONDITION(S)] (low red blood cell count) in people with long-term serious kidney disease (chronic kidney failure), .(www.webmd). Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) from 5/11/22 to 6/06/22 revealed [MEDICATION(S)] Solution had not been administered to the resident. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684May 6, 2021

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide wound care treatment in accordance with physician's orders and acceptable standards of practice for two skin tears for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions of a total sample of 51 residents, (#28). Findings: Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review of the Minimum Data Set quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident #28 required extensive assistance from two staff for bed mobility, toilet use and personal hygiene. Review of the physician's order for resident #28 revealed an order for [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF761May 6, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the controlled medication compartment was properly secured on 1 of 6 medication carts, (Arbor Oak medication cart). Findings: On 5/05/21 at 6:34 PM, during an inspection of the Arbor Unit medication cart, the narcotic compartment labeled Oak was not securely locked. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A was easily able to lift the lid of the narcotic compartment with one finger without using his key. On 5/05/21 at 7:02 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated nurses should not rely on the drawer closure to lock and secure the narcotic compartment. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 36 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 6, 2023Standard1 finding
  • Jun 7, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • May 6, 2021Standard3 findings
  • Oct 17, 2019Standard1 finding
  • Aug 23, 2018Standard6 findings
  • May 11, 2017Standard4 findings
  • Jun 22, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 12, 2016Standard6 findings
Show the 5 earlier surveys
  • Jan 28, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 30, 2014Standard3 findings
  • Nov 15, 2013—1 finding
  • Sep 14, 2012—5 findings
  • Aug 11, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction