Deficiency Index

Life Care Center of Pensacola

Pensacola, Florida · CCN 106073

15 surveys since 2010, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
37
Surveys
15
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2025
’10’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file12/15

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
120
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA
County
Escambia
Medicare-certified since
2006

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
4
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=5, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Sep 10, 2025

425 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.713.57
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.80—
Annual nurse turnover49.2%44.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3100.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 3 of the 37 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Life Care Center of Pensacola, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF880Sep 10, 2025

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) as an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities for 1 of 1 residents observed for transmission based precautions. (Resident #131)The findings include: Observations performed on 09/07/25 at approximately 12:58 PM and 4:25 PM and 9/08/25 at 8:19 AM discovered that there was no EBP signage posted and no Personnel Protective Equipment (PPE) access outside of the room for Resident #131. (Photographic Evidence Obtained). On 09/07/25 at approximately 12:58 PM, an interview was conducted with Resident #131. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF880Oct 2, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure measures to prevent the spread of infection were followed for 1 of 3 residents observed on contact isolation precautions. (Resident #1) The findings include: During an initial facility tour between 10:37 am and 11:40am on 10/01/2024, an observation was made of Staff G, a Housekeeper, through the open door of room [ROOM NUMBER] mopping the floor. Housekeeping Staff G was wearing gloves while mopping, but no other personal protective equipment (PPE) was observed. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF880Mar 30, 2023

    Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff follow appropriate isolation precautions during the provision of resident care for 1 of 3 sampled residents on transmission-based precautions. (Resident #13) The findings include: An observation of resident #13 was conducted on 3/27/23 at 3:29 PM. The resident was sitting in her wheelchair in her room and employee A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was observed taking the resident's blood pressure using a rolling vital sign machine. Employee A, CNA was not wearing a gown or gloves while taking resident #13's blood pressure. Contact precautions signage was observed on resident #13's door stating everyone must: clean their hands, including before entering and when leaving the room. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF761Oct 28, 2021

    Based on observations, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to properly store medications for 1 of 5 residents sampled for unnecessary medications (#47). The findings include: On 10/25/21 at 11:13 AM, an observation was made of resident #47. A bottle of medication was observed on the over the bed table. The medication was [MEDICATION(S)], brigandine [MEDICATION(S)]/[MEDICATION(S)] ophthalmic solution 0.2%-0.5%. [MEDICATION(S)] is an eye drop medication used to treat [CONDITION(S)]. There was no staff in the residents room at the time (photographic evidence obtained). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF609Aug 30, 2021

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report all allegations of abuse or neglect to the State Agency for 1 of 1 residents sampled for federal reporting requirements. (Resident #1) The findings include: A review of Resident #1's clinical record was conducted. Review of progress notes revealed a note made by the Executive Department on 7/8/2021 related to facility initiated contact with the resident's family regarding care concerns and APS (Adult Protective Services) complaints. On 8/12/2021 at approximately 10:00 AM, an entrance conference was conducted with the Administrator and the Director of Nursing/Risk Manager. The surveyor requested any mandatory federal reports filed since 1/25/2021. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 37 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Sep 10, 2025Standard1 finding
  • Oct 2, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 30, 2023Standard1 finding
  • Oct 28, 2021Standard1 finding
  • Aug 30, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 9, 2020Standard3 findings
  • Jan 14, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 21, 2019Standard4 findings
Show the 7 earlier surveys
  • Mar 1, 2018Standard5 findings
  • Oct 29, 2015Standard2 findings
  • Oct 31, 2014Standard2 findings
  • Feb 21, 2014Standard1 finding
  • Jan 11, 2013—1 finding
  • Dec 15, 2011—5 findings
  • Nov 18, 2010—8 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction