Deficiency Index

Snohomish Health and Rehabilitation of Cascadia

Snohomish, Washington · CCN 505338

64 surveys since 2010, 25 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
284
Surveys
64
Harm or worse
25
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file51/64

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
91
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
CASCADIA HEALTHCARE
County
Snohomish
Medicare-certified since
1989

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
1
Staffing
2
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 52 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Washington.

Last survey on record

May 1, 2026

192 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.784.01
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.95—
Annual nurse turnover56.0%41.9%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$188,426 across 3 penalties
Payment denials
1

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ11.5%K—L—
Actual harmG57.7%H11.5%I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3655.4%E1827.7%F34.6%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C11.5%
CMS’s current file: 65 of the 284 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6105×

    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

  • F6894×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F7603×

    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.

  • F8423×

    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

  • F5612×

    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Snohomish Health and Rehabilitation of Cascadia, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689May 1, 2026

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who engaged in smoking had adequate supervision to protect residents and/or staff from potential fire hazards for 2 of 3 residents (Resident 51 and 32) reviewed for smoking. This failure placed all residents at serious risk for injury related to unsafe smoking practices and constituted an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ).The failed practice resulted in an IJ on 04/26/2026 when the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment was safe from burns and fire. The IJ was removed on 04/28/2026 after the facility provided a safe receptacle for properly disposing of cigarette butts, reassessed and educated staff and residents of the facility's no smoking policy and confiscated residents smoking paraphernalia. […]

  • Actual harm, patternF686May 1, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess the increased risk for skin breakdown, follow written policy and procedures, develop, and implement timely interventions necessary to prevent the development of avoidable pressure ulcers (PUs)for 4 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 1, 2, 3 and 4), reviewed for PUs. These failures caused harm to Resident 1 who admitted to the facility with a Stage 2 PU which deteriorated into an unstageable PU with osteomyelitis (bone infection), debridement (removal of dead [necrotic] or infected skin tissue to try to help wound heal), and a hospital treatment. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689May 1, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently implement care plan interventions related to bed height and mattress type to prevent accidents/falls for 1 of 1 sample resident (Resident 7) reviewed for falls and accident hazards. Resident 7 experienced harm when they fell out of bed and sustained a left hip fracture (broken bone), pain, and required hospitalization . These failures placed residents at risk for potential falls, injuries, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Fall Response & Management, revised on 05/17/2021, showed for a fall with injury, staff should avoid moving the resident their status is fully evaluated to prevent further injury if an injury occurred as a result of the fall. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF697Feb 9, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently recognize and respond to complaints of pain and failed to consistently implement wound care recommendations related to pain management in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 55) reviewed for pain management. Resident 55 experienced harm when nursing staff failed to recognize and respond to complaints of pain and failed to implement wound care recommendations related to pain management. This failed practice placed residents at risk for unmanaged pain and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 55 admitted to the facility 06/30/2023 with diagnoses which included diabetes, history of bleeding in the brain, and throat cancer. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Dec 12, 2023

    Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to protect a cognitively impaired resident from unwanted touch for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 2) reviewed for sexual abuse. Resident 2 experienced psychosocial harm, based on a reasonable person concept, when they received a non-consensual sexual touch from Resident 1, who had been identified in the past of inappropriate behaviors and sexually suggestive statements with female staff and a history of wandering into Resident 2's room on multiple occasions. The facility failed to identify an incident of sexual abuse, report it timely to the state agency, and potentially placed cognitively impaired residents at risk for unwanted sexual touch and psychosocial harm. […]

Read 44 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 44 of 284 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 1, 2026Standard and complaint19 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 14, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 14, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 15, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • May 23, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 31, 2025Standard9 findings
  • May 1, 2024Complaint4 findings · 2 harm
  • Mar 20, 2024Complaint1 finding
Show the 56 earlier surveys
  • Feb 9, 2024Standard15 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 12, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Nov 8, 2023Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 17, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 12, 2023Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
  • May 24, 2023Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 24, 2023Standard and complaint13 findings
  • Sep 13, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 5, 2022Complaint3 findings
  • Mar 15, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 9, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 21, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 14, 2019Standard18 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 15, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 26, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 5, 2019Complaint3 findings
  • Jun 25, 2019Complaint5 findings
  • Jan 11, 2019Complaint8 findings
  • Nov 30, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 29, 2018Standard and complaint11 findings
  • Sep 28, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 10, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 2, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 13, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 21, 2017Standard and complaint28 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 19, 2017Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Jun 2, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 28, 2017Complaint4 findings · 2 harm
  • Dec 23, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 2, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 18, 2016Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 10, 2016Standard17 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 14, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 2, 2016Complaint6 findings · 2 harm
  • Dec 30, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 18, 2015Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 26, 2015Standard and complaint9 findings
  • Nov 17, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 23, 2014Complaint3 findings
  • Jul 25, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 11, 2014—10 findings
  • May 30, 2013—3 findings
  • Nov 15, 2012—6 findings
  • Aug 6, 2012—1 finding
  • Mar 30, 2012—2 findings
  • Feb 13, 2012—7 findings
  • Jan 13, 2012—3 findings
  • Dec 1, 2011—1 finding
  • Sep 28, 2011—11 findings · 2 harm
  • Sep 16, 2011—2 findings
  • Aug 19, 2011—2 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 1, 2011—2 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 17, 2011—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Apr 16, 2011—1 finding
  • Dec 16, 2010—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Sep 24, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction