Deficiency Index

Skyview Rehab and Nursing

Wallingford, Connecticut · CCN 075057

33 surveys since 2010, 7 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
192
Surveys
33
Harm or worse
7
Immediate jeopardy
4
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy4

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file24/33

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
97
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
Independent
County
Naugatuck Vly
Medicare-certified since
1967

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
2
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 27 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Connecticut.

Last survey on record

Jul 14, 2026

118 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.063.64
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.60—
Annual nurse turnover43.8%40.1%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ45.8%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD5275.4%E913.0%F11.4%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B22.9%C11.4%
CMS’s current file: 69 of the 192 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8424×

    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

  • F6103×

    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

  • F6843×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F5782×

    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

  • F5802×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Skyview Rehab and Nursing, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Sep 28, 2021

    Based on observation, review of clinical records, facility documentation, interviews, and policies, for six (6) of sixteen (16) residents, who required total assistance with bathing, incontinent care, and repositioning, (Resident #60, #27, #44, #4, #77, and #17), the facility neglected to provide the necessary care resulting in Immediate Jeopardy, and for one of three residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #45), the facility failed to ensure that the resident was free from abuse. Additionally, for 9 residents (Resident #5, 23, 32, 35, 39, 40, 47, 53, 63) who were not provided incontinent care on 8/19/21 during the 3:00 PM - 11:00 PM shift, the facility failed to ensure the residents was free from neglect. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Sep 28, 2021

    Based on observation, review of clinical records, facility documentation, interviews, and policies, for one of three residents at risk for elopement, (Resident #45), the facility failed to provide the necessary supervision when the resident was left unattended outside by staff on two occasions resulting in a finding of Immediate Jeopardy. In addition, the facility failed to check the placement and function of the resident's wander guard in accordance with facility policy. Additionally, for 2 of 7 residents (Resident #37 and 79) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment resulting in injury. The findings include: The findings include: 1. Resident #45 had a diagnosis of an [CONDITION(S)] and [CONDITION(S)]. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF725Sep 28, 2021

    Based on a review of facility documentation, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that staffing levels were adequate to meet the needs of four (4) of thirty three (33) residents on the B wing (Residents #4, #17, #44, and Resident #77) in accordance with the plan of care which resulted in a finding of Immediate Jeopardy. Additionally, for 2 out of 3 wings reviewed for staffing, the facility failed to ensure there was sufficient nurse staffing to meet the needs of the residents on 9/3/21 at the beginning of the 7:00 AM to 3:00 PM shift and for 1 resident (Resident #79), reviewed for an allegation of neglect, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to maintain the residents highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF880Sep 28, 2021

    Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that visitors were screened for symptoms of COVID-19 upon entry into the facility in accordance with facility policy, failed to maintain compliance with the submitted action plan to address screening of visitors, failed to ensure the COVID-19 observation unit had proper signage posted at the entrance of the unit, failed to ensure staff utilized Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while caring for Residents on the observation unit, and that PPE was properly discarded after use, resulting in a finding of Immediate Jeopardy. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Sep 7, 2021

    Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #79), reviewed for an allegation of neglect, the facility failed to ensure the resident was free from neglect. The findings include: Resident #79 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review of the May 2021 physician's orders [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Additionally, the orders identified Resident #79 requires the assistance of 2 staff (extensive assistance) for upper/lower body dressing, and toilet transfers and limited assistance for personal hygiene. Review of the weight's summary dated 5/18/21 identified Resident #79 weighed 402.1 lbs. […]

Read 27 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 27 of 192 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 14, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 24, 2026Complaint5 findings
  • Mar 16, 2026Standard and complaint14 findings
  • Jan 30, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • May 27, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 26, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 22, 2024Standard15 findings
  • Oct 24, 2023Complaint1 finding
Show the 25 earlier surveys
  • Jul 5, 2022Complaint3 findings
  • Apr 5, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 19, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 6, 2022Complaint3 findings
  • Sep 28, 2021Standard32 findings · 4 harm
  • Sep 7, 2021Complaint9 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 26, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 27, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Nov 12, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Jul 20, 2020Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jul 7, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • May 26, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Feb 26, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 27, 2019Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Nov 8, 2018Standard8 findings
  • Oct 13, 2017Standard5 findings
  • Apr 6, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 16, 2016Standard and complaint12 findings
  • Jan 14, 2016Standard8 findings
  • Dec 8, 2014Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Apr 1, 2014Complaint3 findings
  • Nov 18, 2013—13 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 21, 2012—12 findings
  • Dec 12, 2011—9 findings
  • Nov 9, 2010—8 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction