Simi Healthcare Center
Simi Valley, California · CCN 555701
37 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2020.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 122
- Surveys
- 37
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 99
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Ventura
- Medicare-certified since
- 1997
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 423 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in California.
Last survey on record
Apr 16, 2026
207 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.58 | 4.16 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.54 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 39.1% | 37.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $8,446 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G11.7% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D4882.8% | E712.1% | F23.4% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6565×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F8424×
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
- F6583×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F7613×
Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
- F9193×
Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Simi Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Jun 30, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer ordered morning medications, including sliding scale insulin, and failed to monitor blood glucose levels as ordered for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in Resident 1 experiencing critically high blood glucose levels, becoming unresponsive, requiring emergency medical treatment, and ultimately dying following transfer to an acute care hospital. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 6/3/25, the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted in the facility on 4/24/25 with diagnoses including, diabetes mellitus type 1 (DM 1, condition in which the body cannot produce insulin or produces so little that insulin therapy is required to survive), Parkinson's disease… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Aug 6, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the observance of proper sanitation and food handling practices when the Dietary Manager (DM) and 3 Dietary Staff (DS1, DS2, DS3), failed to wear a beard restraint during food handling. This failure had the potential to result in foodborne illnesses among the residents. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/3/26 at 11:55 AM with the DM in the kitchen during lunch food service, the DM, DS1, DS2, and DS3 were all observed with facial hair present and no beard restraint used. The DM agreed that all facial hair should be covered by a beard restraint in the kitchen to prevent potential contamination of the food. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF801Aug 7, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was a full time Director of Food and Nutrition Services (DFN) who met the federal and state's education qualification requirements to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the part-time contracted Registered Dietitian (RD) provided sufficient frequently scheduled consultation to the DFN to include overseeing kitchen sanitation, food preparation, meal service and food storage.This failure that had the potential to place 69 of 69 residents who received meals from the kitchen at an increased risk of foodborne illness and/or unmet nutritional needs. During an interview on 08/4/25 at 9 a.m. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Aug 7, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sanitation and food safety in the kitchen when: 1. Multiple opened and prepared food items were unlabeled or undated in the reach-in-freezer, walk-in refrigerator and dry storage areas. 2. The walk-in refrigerator and dry storage room were not maintained in clean and sanitary condition, as evidenced by cracked fixtures, holes in the ceiling, debris on the floor and shelving, dust built up on fans and pipes, and visible black residue on walls. 3. Clean food service equipment was not handled and stored in a sanitary manner as evidenced by designating visibly soiled equipment as clean and handling clean rack of dishes with unwashed hands. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF755Aug 7, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that1. All medications stored in the facility's drug storage areas were available for use and had not expired.2. Pharmaceutical E-Kits (Emergency Kits containing antibiotics, sedatives, pain medications in limited quantities intended for use when supplies are limited) were replaced after opening.These failures had the potential to affect the efficacy and availability of medications administered to residents. Findings: 1. During a review of the facility’s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, “Storage of Medications,” dated 1/2025, the P&P indicated, “Procedures…n. […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 122 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 6, 2026Standard8 findings
- Apr 16, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jan 22, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Aug 7, 2025Standard19 findings
- Jun 30, 2025Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 16, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Mar 17, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jan 25, 2025Complaint2 findings
Show the 29 earlier surveys
- Jan 6, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Sep 3, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jul 26, 2024Standard and complaint13 findings
- Jun 4, 2024Complaint3 findings
- Apr 2, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Feb 7, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Apr 22, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Dec 9, 2021Standard9 findings
- Dec 28, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Aug 24, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Mar 10, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Feb 4, 2020Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Oct 3, 2019Standard6 findings
- Mar 15, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Oct 11, 2018Standard3 findings
- Oct 9, 2017Standard5 findings
- Jul 27, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Jul 19, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Apr 4, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Oct 20, 2016Standard10 findings
- Sep 16, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Nov 19, 2015Standard8 findings
- Jul 14, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Jun 16, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Nov 14, 2014Standard2 findings
- Apr 14, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Oct 24, 2013—2 findings
- Oct 19, 2012—3 findings
- Dec 16, 2011—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction