Del Amo Gardens Care Center
Torrance, California · CCN 555706
23 surveys since 2010, 6 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 167
- Surveys
- 23
- Harm or worse
- 6
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 94
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Los Angeles
- Medicare-certified since
- 1997
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 423 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in California.
Last survey on record
Jan 23, 2026
290 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.42 | 4.16 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.49 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 32.1% | 37.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $8,018 across 1 penalty
- Payment denials
- 1
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G12.2% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3066.7% | E1124.4% | F36.7% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6883×
Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
- F8123×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6862×
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
- F7592×
Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Del Amo Gardens Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF686May 7, 2024
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident, who was assessed as a high risk for developing a pressure ulcer (prolonged pressure on the skin that results in injury to the skin and underlying tissue, usually occur over bony prominence because of long-term pressure), did not develop a deep tissue injury ([DTI] (purple or maroon localized area of discolored intact skin or blood-filled blister due to damage of underlying soft tissue from pressure) on the right heel for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). The facility failed to: 1. Ensure Resident 1 was turned and repositioned every two hours and provided with a pressure reducing device in bed. 2. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF867Nov 23, 2024
Based on interview and record review the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA committees established for the purpose of improving the safety and quality of health services) and Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI- approach to maintain and improve safety and quality in nursing homes) committee failed to implement corrective action to the potential systemic problems identified: 1. Maintain a system to monitor weight loss. 2. Maintain a system to ensure the reporting of falls with major injury. 3. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Nov 3, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in a sanitary manner to prevent growth of microorganisms (an organism that can be seen only through a microscope) that could cause food borne illness (food poisoning: any illness resulting from the food spoilage of contaminated food, disease causing bacteria, viruses, or parasites that contaminate food, as well as toxins) for 70 out 73 total residents in the facility by not: 1. ensuring Foods were dated, labeled, properly sealed, and discarded before the used by date (expiration dates). 2. monitoring and documenting the temperature for the facility's freezers. 3. maintaining a clean environment around the dumpsters outside. 4. monitoring and documenting sanitization bucket log. 5. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Nov 3, 2023
Based on observation,interview, and record review the facility failed to: A. Follow their own policy and procedures (P/Ps) titled, Glove Use - Personal Protective Equipment, and Hand Washing - Hand Hygiene to ensure licensed nurses wash or sanitized their hands after removing gloves and before putting on a new pair of gloves. This deficient practice had the potential to expose one out of four residents (Resident 270) to contaminants and infection. B. Clean two of two cloth gait belts (assistive device used for lifting, transferring, and walking patients who have limited mobility issues) in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations for sanitizing wipes (pre-moistened towelettes that contain a sanitizing or disinfecting formula that kill or reduce germs on surfaces) in-between… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Nov 4, 2022
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had: 1.Food items had no open dates and were not properly sealed. 2.One of three dietary staff, did not wear gloves during food handling and preparation. 3.One ice machine with black sediments around the machine upon inspection. These deficient practices had the potential for causing food-borne illnesses (caused by consuming contaminated food, beverages, or water) to residents. Findings: 1.During an observation on 11/1/2022, at 8:20 a.m., in the kitchen, 15 food items that were stored in Storage 1, next to the freezers, and seven (7) food items that were stored in Storage 2, dry storage, had no received date and open date. There was yellow cheese stored in the refrigerator without a covering (open to air). 2. […]
Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 167 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jan 23, 2026Standard7 findings
- Jul 23, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Nov 23, 2024Standard18 findings
- May 7, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Nov 3, 2023Standard18 findings
- Nov 4, 2022Standard9 findings
- Jul 26, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Oct 20, 2020Infection control1 finding
Show the 15 earlier surveys
- Oct 23, 2019Standard11 findings
- Sep 6, 2019Complaint6 findings
- Nov 16, 2018Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
- Oct 16, 2018Standard10 findings
- Nov 21, 2017Standard16 findings
- Oct 31, 2016Standard7 findings
- Sep 6, 2016Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- May 23, 2016Complaint2 findings
- May 10, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Dec 29, 2015Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Aug 31, 2015Standard and complaint11 findings
- Aug 28, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Apr 28, 2013—12 findings
- Jan 23, 2012—13 findings
- Dec 16, 2010Standard15 findings · 1 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction