Sherwood Healthcare Center
Sacramento, California · CCN 055305
31 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2017.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 105
- Surveys
- 31
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 62
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- CYPRESS HEALTHCARE GROUP
- County
- Sacramento
- Medicare-certified since
- 1971
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=15, floor 20).
Last survey on record
May 9, 2025
549 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.97 | 4.36 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.35 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 30.0% | 36.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D646.2% | E646.2% | F17.7% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8122×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F5841×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
- F6561×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6581×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F6841×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Sherwood Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 9, 2025
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1. Employees were unable to demonstrate the correct concentration for sanitation solution, 2. Several pots, pans, bowls, and trays were found stacked wet (in ready to use areas), 3. Two frying pans were found darkened, stained, and scratched, 4. Three ladles, two saucepans, and a colander were found stored with a white film covering the food contact surfaces, 5. Two sandwiches stored in the refrigerator had missing information on label, and an opened gelatin container lacked any labeling, 6. Broken, chipped tiles and missing paint found on floor of kitchen and storeroom, 7. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF658May 9, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of care were followed for three of 23 sampled residents (Resident 3, Resident 31, and Resident 45), for a census of 54, when: 1. Resident 3's weight change was not reported to the physician as ordered; 2. Resident 45's weight changes were not reported to the physician as ordered; 3. Resident 31's arm circumference and catheter length were not recorded during midline catheter (a thin, soft tube placed into a large vein in the upper arm) dressing change as ordered; 4. Resident 31's Midodrine (medication used to treat low blood pressure) doses were administered outside the blood pressure parameters; and, 5. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF804May 9, 2025
Based on observation, interview and record review food was not prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance when 1) recipes were not followed, and 2) hot food was not consistently provided to residents in the 2nd hall. This failure had the potential to lead to poor intake, nutrient deficiencies, and malnutrition for the 51 residents eating facility-prepared foods. Findings: 1. During a visit to the kitchen on 5/7/25 at 9:30 a.m. Dietary [NAME] (DC) was preparing the lunch meal which consisted of Sweet and Sour Chicken, Sesame Noodles, Stir Fry Vegetables, Mandarin Asian Salad, and a Lemon Snow Bar. Review of facility provided recipe Sweet & Sour Chicken (Healthcare Menus Direct, LLC, 2024) was reviewed with DC. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF806May 9, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the alternative food options provided to residents who choose the peanut butter and jelly (PB&J), or grilled cheese sandwiches were not of similar nutritive value to the main entree. This failure had the possibility of leading to malnutrition and weight loss. Findings: During a visit to the kitchen during lunch meal plating on 5/8/25 at 11:25 a.m., a grilled cheese sandwich was prepared and left on the grill. Dietary [NAME] (DC) stated it was for a resident who had ordered the sandwich for lunch instead of the main meal. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF813May 9, 2025
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility lacked a dedicated refrigerator for storing food brought for residents by family or visitors. This failure had the potential to limit food intake due to the inability to store preferred foods. Findings: During an interview on 5/8/25 at 8:40 a.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA 1) on Hallway 2, CNA 1 stated that food could be brought in for residents. The food would be checked against the diet order as well as checked for safety before being given to the resident. The residents would have 2 hours to consume it and after that, the food would be considered unsafe and would be discarded. […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 105 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- May 9, 2025Standard9 findings
- Dec 22, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jun 17, 2021Standard4 findings
- Jan 22, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Aug 28, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Jul 28, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Feb 27, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Jul 9, 2019Complaint3 findings
Show the 23 earlier surveys
- Apr 12, 2019Standard16 findings
- Nov 13, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Mar 23, 2018Standard2 findings
- Mar 13, 2018Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 26, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Jan 19, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Nov 5, 2017Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 9, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Jan 20, 2017Standard7 findings
- Jan 17, 2017Complaint3 findings
- Jan 11, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Dec 2, 2016Complaint1 finding
- May 5, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Apr 5, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Feb 16, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Jan 28, 2016Standard6 findings
- Feb 20, 2015Standard2 findings
- Jul 24, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Jan 30, 2014Standard7 findings
- Jan 10, 2013—4 findings
- Jul 3, 2012—1 finding
- Jan 26, 2012—4 findings
- Dec 30, 2010—12 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction