Ridgeview Skilled Nursing Facility
San Diego, California · CCN 555928
7 surveys since 2023, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 20
- Surveys
- 7
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Across 7 surveys carrying at least one finding.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 45
- Ownership
- For profit - Individual
- Chain
- CONTINUING LIFE
- County
- San Diego
- Medicare-certified since
- 2023
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 252 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in California.
Last survey on record
Nov 24, 2025
350 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 5.33 | 4.36 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 2.16 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 55.1% | 36.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $33,238 across 6 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1890.0% | E210.0% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F5802×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F8122×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F5571×
Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Ridgeview Skilled Nursing Facility, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812May 8, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food items were labeled and dated/not expired. In addition, there were produce items with mold. These failures had the potential to cause food-borne illness for the residents. Findings: An initial tour/observation of the facility's kitchen with the chef was conducted on [DATE] at 8:45 A.M. The following items were found unlabeled/undated: 1 package of fresh mushrooms with no date received; 1 bowl of a white, unidentified sauce (later identified as tartar sauce) in the refrigerator with no label, no date mixed/or use by date; 1 tray of individual salad dressing not labeled or dated; 3 cans (6.88 lbs each) of garbanzo beans, banana pudding, and canned peaches with no received by date or use by date; 2 bags of… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF887May 8, 2024
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer COVID-19 (a highly contagious virus) vaccine booster (an extra dose of the vaccine after an original is administer), to four out of five residents (Residents 4, 6, 114, and 116) reviewed for infection control. As a result, residents were at risk of contracting a potentially life-threatening infection. Findings: 1. Resident 4 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included pneumonia due to SARS-Associated Coronavirus (COVID-19), per the facility's Admission Record. On [DATE], Resident 4's clinical record was reviewed. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF580Nov 24, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure related to notification of the physician when one of three residents (Resident 1) who had a foley catheter (a thin flexible tube inserted through the urethra( the duct by which urine is conveyed out of the body) into the bladder to drain and collect urine) had episodes of low urine output on different shifts. This failure had the potential to affect Resident 1's health condition. Findings.A review of the facility's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Nondisplaced Fracture of the Sacrum (a break in the base of the spine) and Neuromuscular Dysfunction of the Bladder (issues with bladder control and function). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF656Nov 24, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the written care plan related to documenting intake and output for one of three residents (Resident 1) who had a foley catheter and passing low amount of urine. This failure had the potential to cause serious complications and could harm Resident 1's health. Findings.A review of the facility's admission Record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosed which included Nondisplaced Fracture of the Sacrum (a break in the base of the spine) and Neuromuscular Dysfunction of the Bladder( issues with bladder control and function). On 11/24/25 at 11:45 A.M, an interview and record review with Licensed Nurse (LN) 1 was conducted. LN 1 stated a care plan for Resident 1's foley catheter use was in place. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF690Nov 24, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor and identify episodes of low urine output and communicated to the physician for one of three residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to cause worsening symptoms for Resident 1.Findings.A review of the facility's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included nondisplaced fracture of the sacrum (a break in the base of the spine) and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder(issues with bladder control and function). On 11/24/25 at 11:45 A.M., an interview and record review with Licensed Nurse (LN)1 was conducted. […]
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Nov 24, 2025Complaint3 findings
- Aug 14, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jun 12, 2025Standard7 findings
- May 8, 2024Standard3 findings
- Mar 19, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Dec 19, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Jun 21, 2023Standard3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction