Deficiency Index

Shelby Pointe

Shelby, Ohio · CCN 365331

19 surveys since 2010, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
72
Surveys
19
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2025
’10’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse2

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file16/19

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
45
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
JAG HEALTHCARE
County
Richland
Medicare-certified since
1976

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
2
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 188 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Ohio.

Last survey on record

Jan 2, 2025

676 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.063.57
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.25—
Annual nurse turnover46.2%46.9%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD853.3%E213.3%F213.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B16.7%C213.3%
CMS’s current file: 15 of the 72 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F7582×

    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.

  • F5581×

    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

  • F5751×

    Post a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.

  • F6411×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

  • F6441×

    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Shelby Pointe, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF744Nov 21, 2022

    Based on medical record review, review of the Self-Reported Incident, review of hospital records, staff interviews, observations, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with dementia was provided person-centered interventions to prevent the resident from wandering into the rooms of other residents and potentially being harmed. Actual harm occurred when Resident #34 wandered into the room of Resident #43, and Resident #43 then pulled Resident #34 to the ground causing Resident #34 to receive an inferior dislocation of the left shoulder, and a closed traumatic displaced fracture of the proximal end of the left humerus. This affected one (#34) of three residents reviewed for dementia care. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF921Jan 2, 2025

    Based observation and staff interview the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment. This had the potential to affect all 43 residents residing in the facility. The census was 43. Findings include: An environmental tour was conducted on 12/31/24 between 12:55 P.M. and 2:25 P.M. with the Administrator. Observation of the exterior of the facility revealed the second window from the furthest east point of the building on the north side of the East Hall revealed the window screen was off its track and laying propped up against the building in an unsecured manner. Observation of the interior of the facility revealed the light ballast cover on the East Hall right before the egress exit revealed it contained dirt, debris, various dead bugs, and was partially cracked. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Oct 12, 2023

    Based on observations, staff interviews and contractor interviews, the facility failed to ensure the low temperature dishwasher was functioning properly to sanitize the dishes and utensils. This had the potential to affect all 38 residents who the facility identified as receiving meals from the facility. The facility also failed to handle, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This affected seven residents (#4, #5, #8, #12, #14, #21 and #26) who the facility identified as receiving mechanical soft diets. The facility census was 38. Findings include: 1) Observation of the low temperature dishwasher on 10/10/23 at 8:47 A.M. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Nov 21, 2022

    Based on observations, kitchen cleaning forms and schedule review and staff interviews, the facility failed to keep the food services carts clean. This could potentially affect 42 of 42 residents residing in the facility as all resident receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 42. Findings include: Observation on 11/17/22 at 6:34 A.M., of the kitchen, revealed two metal carts that are used to transport the food down the hallways to the residents were not clean. The metal carts were both observed with a large amount of dried liquid and food particles throughout the carts, especially on the sides and bottom. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Nov 3, 2021

    Based on record review, observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to post signage at facility entrances alerting visitors when they should not enter the building and failed to clearly identify the process for COVID-19 screenings, including but not limited to, current infection control prevention, control standards for personal protective equipment (PPE), social distancing and sign/symptom reporting. This affected five (Residents #9, #11, #14, #1 and #21) of five residents reviewed. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 35. Findings include: Upon entrance to the facility on [DATE] at 9:30 A.M. a table was observed at the main entrance, with masks, a non-touch thermometer and hand sanitizer. […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 72 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jan 2, 2025Standard8 findings
  • Oct 12, 2023Standard5 findings
  • Nov 21, 2022Complaint8 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 3, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 5, 2021Standard and complaint2 findings
  • May 27, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 7, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 28, 2019Standard1 finding
Show the 11 earlier surveys
  • Jan 5, 2018Standard2 findings
  • Oct 13, 2016Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Jul 12, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 10, 2015Standard3 findings
  • Aug 28, 2014Standard and complaint3 findings
  • May 17, 2013—5 findings
  • Aug 29, 2012—1 finding
  • Feb 16, 2012—10 findings
  • Sep 13, 2011—1 finding
  • Aug 11, 2011—9 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 2, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction