Deficiency Index

Shady Lawn Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Cadiz, Kentucky · CCN 185252

15 surveys since 2010, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
52
Surveys
15
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file13/15

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
50
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
BENJAMIN LANDA
County
Trigg
Medicare-certified since
1991

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
3
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=4, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Nov 17, 2021

1,818 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.463.66
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.77—
Annual nurse turnover50.0%45.1%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD675.0%E112.5%F112.5%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 8 of the 52 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Shady Lawn Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Nov 17, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure staff properly utilized personal protective equipment (PPE), which included the donning (putting PPE on) and doffing (taking PPE off) when entering one (1) of two (2) sampled isolation rooms. This had the potential to affect all facility residents. The findings include: Review of the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) publication, titled, Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Healthcare Personnel During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic, updated 09/10/ , revealed it provided guidance for the proper use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF580Aug 28, 2026

    Based on interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to immediately notify a resident's representative of a decision to transfer/discharge the resident from the facility for 1 of 4 residents (Resident (R) 28) reviewed for transfer/discharge from the facility, out of the total sample of 12 residents. On 08/16/2026, the facility transferred R28 to a local hospital for a higher level of care; however, did not notify the resident's Power of Attorney (POA) of the transfer.The findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Admission, Transfer, and Discharge Standard of Practice, revised 04/2025, revealed the purpose of the policy was to ensure the process of admission, discharge, and transfer met regulatory requirements. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF689Sep 8, 2022

    Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure one (1) of ten (10) sampled residents received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents (Resident #1). The facility assessed and care planned Resident #1 to require the use of a mechanical lift for all transfers. On 07/13/2022, Resident #1 sustained a fall from a mechanical lift while being transferred from the bed to the wheelchair, after staff tried to manually transfer the resident when the lift failed to operate properly. The resident was transferred to the Hospital emergency room (ER) immediately after the fall with no acute findings noted. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF908Sep 8, 2022

    Based on interview, record review, review of facility policy, and review of the facility investigation, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a mechanical lift was maintained in safe operating condition prior to use for one (1) of ten (10) sampled residents (Resident #1). On 07/13/2022, Resident #1 sustained a fall from a Bariatric Electric Patient Lift, while being transferred from the bed to the wheelchair. The lift malfunctioned, not allowing the resident to be elevated into his/her wheelchair. As a result, staff attempted to manually transfer the resident, causing the resident to slide out of the sling and onto the floor. The resident was transferred to the Hospital emergency room (ER) with no acute findings noted according to the Emergency Department (ED) note. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 52 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 28, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 8, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 17, 2021Standard1 finding
  • May 21, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Jan 17, 2019Standard7 findings
  • May 16, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 2, 2017Standard2 findings
  • Jan 15, 2016Standard and complaint7 findings
Show the 7 earlier surveys
  • Oct 12, 2015Complaint4 findings
  • Nov 20, 2014Standard4 findings
  • Feb 13, 2014Standard4 findings
  • Apr 11, 2013—5 findings
  • Jan 26, 2012—5 findings
  • Jun 15, 2011—5 findings
  • Nov 5, 2010—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction