Deficiency Index

Greenville Nursing and Rehabilitation

Greenville, Kentucky · CCN 185317

14 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
28
Surveys
14
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file11/14

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
60
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
DAVID MARX
County
Muhlenberg · rural
Medicare-certified since
1992

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
2
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=5, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jan 9, 2025

669 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.393.66
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.43—
Annual nurse turnover39.0%45.1%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD571.4%E—F114.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C114.3%
CMS’s current file: 7 of the 28 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Greenville Nursing and Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF585Jan 9, 2025

    Based on interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure its grievance policy was followed regarding resident/guardian notification of grievance status and outcomes for one (Resident (R) 1) of three residents reviewed for grievances. R1's guardian caused a grievance to be filed on R1's behalf. The facility failed to provide R1's guardian with a written grievance decision which contained all required information, including, but not limited to, the date the grievance was received and the outcome of the grievance. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF561Jun 20, 2024

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure 3 (Residents (R) 30, R38, and R46) of 22 sampled residents received their nighttime medications at a time preferred by the residents. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration, copyright 2024, indicated, Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection. An undated document titled, Medication times provided by the facility revealed evening medication times were from 6:00 PM to 10:00 PM. 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF759Jun 20, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5 percent (%). The facility had 2 medication errors out of 35 opportunities, affecting 1 (Resident (R)14) of 3 residents reviewed during the medication administration task, resulting in a medication error rate of 5.71%. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration, copyright 2024, indicated, Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection. The policy further indicated, 11. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF791Jun 20, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure routine dental services were provided for 1 (Resident #12) of 2 residents reviewed for dental care. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Dental Services, copyright 2024, indicated, It is the policy of this facility to assist residents in obtaining routine (to the extent covered under the State plan) and emergency dental care. Definitions: 'Routine dental services' means an annual inspection of the oral cavity for signs of disease, diagnosis of dental disease, dental radiographs as needed, dental cleaning, fillings (new and repairs), minor partial or full denture adjustments, smoothing of broken teeth, and limited prosthodontic procedures, e.g. […]

  • No harm, potential for minimal, widespreadF732Jun 20, 2024

    Based on interview, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the posted staffing document included the total number of staff working for each discipline. This had the potential to affect all 59 residents residing in the facility. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Nurse Staffing Posting Information, copyright 2023, revealed, It is the policy of this facility to make nurse staffing information [sic] readily available in a readable format to residents and visitors at any given time. The policy also indicated, 1. The Nurse Staffing Sheet will be posted on a daily basis and will contain the following information: a. Facility name b. The current date c. Facility's current resident census d. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 28 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jan 9, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 20, 2024Standard and complaint4 findings
  • Jul 26, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 12, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • May 22, 2019Complaint3 findings
  • May 2, 2019Standard2 findings
  • Mar 1, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 29, 2018Standard1 finding
Show the 6 earlier surveys
  • Mar 2, 2017Standard1 finding
  • Feb 18, 2016Standard1 finding
  • Dec 18, 2014Standard5 findings
  • Jul 30, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 4, 2013—3 findings
  • Sep 1, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction