Seven Oaks Nursing & Rehabilitation
Bonham, Texas · CCN 675271
17 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2016.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 66
- Surveys
- 17
- Harm or worse
- 4
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 108
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE
- County
- Fannin · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1994
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 377 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Texas.
Last survey on record
Apr 24, 2026
199 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 2.81 | 3.25 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.37 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 100.0% | 54.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2066.7% | E826.7% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B13.3% | C13.3% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8124×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F7612×
Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
- F8042×
Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
- F9212×
Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
- F5501×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Seven Oaks Nursing & Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Apr 24, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen.The facility did not keep the following equipment and surfaces clean and free of debris in the kitchen in that: 1. The stove back splash wall was not clean2. Burners on the stove were caked with food items3. Ovens were dirty4. Deep fryer had crumbs and dried food items5. Fans in the walk-in cooler had dust / debris6. Air vents with visible build-up7. Wash rags stored beneath hand-washing sinkThe facility did not properly store prepared food items in the walk-in cooler in that:1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF806Jul 23, 2025
Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates residents' food preferences for 3 of 22 residents (Resident #29, Resident #15, and Resident #3) reviewed for food preferences and the accommodation of resident's meal choices.1.The facility did not honor Resident #29's preference for milk with her supper meals. 2.The facility failed to honor Resident #15's preferences for a bacon and toast for breakfast.3.The facility failed to provide condiments (jelly and butter) and bread for Resident #3 on 07/20/25. These failures could result in a decrease in resident choices, diminished interest in meals, and weight loss. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF657Jun 18, 2024
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to facilitate resident and family participation in the care planning process for 4 of 15 residents (Resident #15, Resident #17, Resident #21, and Resident #28) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to notify and invite Resident # 17's responsible party to care plan meetings. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 15, Resident #21, Resident #28 and their representatives were invited to their care plan meetings. These failures could place residents at risk of not having needs met by depriving them the opportunity to participate in the decision making regarding their care. Findings included: 1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Jun 18, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for dietary services, in that: 1) The facility failed to label and date all food items. 2) Dietary staff failed to dispose of expired foods items. 3) Dietary Staff failed to effectively reseal, label and date frozen food items. 4) Dietary staff failed to store thawed raw meat below ready to eat foods. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF578Apr 18, 2023
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medical records were maintained in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices on each resident and accurately documented for 3 of 15 residents (Resident's #6, #7, and #16) reviewed for accuracy of medical records. 1. The facility did not ensure Resident #16's OOH-DNR was signed at the bottom by the witnesses. 2. The facility did not ensure Resident #6's signed her OOH-DNR. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #7's OOH-DNR had a license number, printed name, and date for the physician's statement. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs. The findings included: 1. […]
Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 66 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 12, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Apr 24, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Jul 23, 2025Standard8 findings
- Jul 19, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jun 18, 2024Standard6 findings
- Apr 18, 2023Standard13 findings
- Mar 2, 2022Standard and complaint3 findings
- Feb 4, 2020Standard5 findings
Show the 9 earlier surveys
- Jan 15, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Feb 28, 2019Standard3 findings
- Feb 9, 2018Standard4 findings
- Feb 23, 2017Standard2 findings
- Jan 22, 2016Complaint4 findings · 4 harm
- May 7, 2015Standard3 findings
- May 29, 2014Standard6 findings
- Jun 1, 2012—1 finding
- May 6, 2011—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction