Baywood Crossing Rehabilitation & Healthcare Cente

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Baywood Crossing Rehabilitation & Healthcare Cente, in the surveyor’s own words.

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF791Nov 24, 2025

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to assist residents in obtaining routine and 24- hour emergency dental care for 1 of 11 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for dental services in that: The facility failed to assist Resident #1 with obtaining dental services between 7/6/25 when dental pain was noted in Resident #1's electronic medical record and on 8/12/25 when Resident #1's family member made a grievance with the facility regarding Resident #1 wanting to see a dentist. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their oral health care needs met or dental pain.The findings include:Record review of Resident 1's face sheet, dated 10/15/25, revealed a 59- year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF656May 21, 2025

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, that includes measurable objective and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs for 2 (Resident #69 and Resident #302) of 7 residents reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #69's care plan included information regarding assist rails. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #302's care plan included information regarding her use of CPAP and advance directives information. The failure could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate care and interventions to meet their needs. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF700May 21, 2025

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to attempt to assess residents for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation, review the risks and benefits of bed rails prior to installation and obtain informed consent prior to installation for 2 (Resident #69 and Resident #5) of 8 residents reviewed for use of side rails. The facility failed to ensure Residents #69 and #5 had documentation and orders prior to installation of bed rails. This failure could place residents at risk of injury, not have adequate education regarding bed rails and/or staff not have adequate communication regarding residents' use of bed rails. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF552Apr 10, 2024

  Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to inform residents in advance of the risks and benefits of proposed care and treatment for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for resident rights, in that: The facility failed to obtain a signed consent for antipsychotic medication, Quetiapine fumarate (Seroquel) that was administered to Resident #3. The failure could affect residents who received psychoactive medications without informed consents and placed them at risk of receiving treatments without informed consent. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF636Apr 10, 2024

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to conduct initially and periodically a comprehensive, accurate, standardized reproducible assessment of each resident's functional capacity for 4 of 20 (Resident # 8, #26, #76 and & #97) residents review for accuracy of assessment. Resident # 8, #26, #76 and resident #97 were not accurately assessed for their oral dental needs on their MDS assessments. Resident # 76 was not accurately assessed for his vision on his annual MDS assessment. These failures could place the residents at risk for not receiving care and services to maintain their highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being. […]