Deficiency Index

Settlers Ridge Care Center

Celina, Texas · CCN 675969

23 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2018.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
72
Surveys
23
Harm or worse
6
Immediate jeopardy
6
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy6

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file16/23

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
128
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
STONEGATE SENIOR LIVING
County
Collin
Medicare-certified since
2003

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
2
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 22 not-for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Texas.

Last survey on record

Apr 2, 2026

221 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.203.29
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.19—
Annual nurse turnover43.2%41.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2064.5%E1135.5%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 31 of the 72 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6773×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F6902×

    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.

  • F7552×

    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.

  • F7612×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Settlers Ridge Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF692Aug 26, 2022

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range and electrolyte balance to maintain proper hydration and health for one (Resident #1 ) of thirteen residents reviewed for nutritional status. The facility failed to: Ensure Resident #1 maintained proper nutrition and hydration, was assessed by the RD in a timely manner, and interventions were implemented when Resident #1 had significant weight loss and a change in mental status from his admission on [DATE] until he was sent to the hospital on [DATE]. These failures resulted in Resident #1 being hospitalized from [DATE] until [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF580Aug 26, 2022

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately consult with the resident 's physician when there was a significant change in the resident 's physical status and a need to alter treatment significantly for one (Resident #1) of thirteen residents reviewed for notification of changes. The facility failed to immediately consult with Resident #1 's physician when he had significant weight loss and a change in mental status from his admission on [DATE] until he was sent to the hospital on [DATE] which resulted in Resident #1 being hospitalized from [DATE] until [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . His labs at the hospital on [DATE] were BUN 62, Creatinine 2.49. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF656Apr 2, 2026

    Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 5 of 5 residents (Resident #33, #57, #10, #65, and #16) reviewed for comprehensive care plans.The facility failed to ensure Resident #33, #57, #10, #65 and #16's comprehensive care plan addressed their goals, needs, strengths, medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs.This deficient practice could place residents at risk for not receiving proper care and services due to inaccurate care plans.Findings included:Record review of… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Apr 2, 2026

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen safety. The facility failed to ensure food in the facility's dry storage, and refrigerator areas were labeled and dated according to guidelines. The facility failed to seal lids securely on containers in the refrigerator area and dry storage pantry. These deficient practices could affect residents who received meals or snacks from the kitchen and place them at risk for cross contamination and other food-borne illnesses.Findings Included: 3/31/2026 Dry Pantry area revealed 12 plastic round maroon bowls had plastic lids that were unsealed, exposed to the air, not… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF908Apr 2, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain essential equipment in operating condition by failing to maintain walk-in refrigerator and walk-in freezer coolant fans for 1 of 1 kitchens reviewed for equipment in operating condition. The facility failed to maintain the coolant fans in the walk-in freezer and in the walk-in refrigerator for operating condition.The facility's failure to maintain coolant fans in operating condition had the potential to place all residents at risk for cross-contamination and increased risk of foodborne illness. Findings Included:Walk-in refrigerator revealed dripping liquid from the coolant fan within the refrigerator. Walk-in freezer revealed ice build up on the coolant fan within the freezer. […]

Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 72 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 2, 2026Standard6 findings
  • Dec 15, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 18, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 20, 2025Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Nov 20, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 25, 2024Standard8 findings
  • Dec 2, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 10, 2022Standard9 findings
Show the 15 earlier surveys
  • Aug 26, 2022Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Nov 29, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 19, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Jun 4, 2020Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Dec 19, 2019Standard4 findings
  • Nov 15, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 21, 2018Standard7 findings · 3 harm
  • Dec 8, 2017Standard7 findings
  • Nov 16, 2016Standard1 finding
  • Dec 17, 2015Standard6 findings
  • Jan 15, 2015Standard and complaint1 finding
  • Jan 23, 2014—1 finding
  • Mar 7, 2012—2 findings
  • Jan 27, 2012—2 findings
  • Feb 25, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction