Deficiency Index

Schenectady Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing

Schenectady, New York · CCN 335014

24 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2019.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
73
Surveys
24
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2025
’10’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse1

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file20/24

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
240
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
CENTERS HEALTH CARE
County
Schenectady
Medicare-certified since
1967

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
1
Staffing
2
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 259 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in New York.

Last survey on record

Aug 19, 2025

447 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.643.37
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.40—
Annual nurse turnover51.8%33.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2069.0%E413.8%F517.2%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 29 of the 73 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5802×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6772×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

  • F6982×

    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Schenectady Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF725Aug 19, 2025

    F725 Based on observation, interviews, and record review during the recertification and abbreviated survey (Case #s:), the facility did not ensure provision of sufficient nursing staff to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident throughout the facility. Specifically, the facility's minimum staffing levels were not met on multiple shifts and multiple units between 8/04/2025 and 8/17/2025. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF755Aug 19, 2025

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that drug records were in order; and that an account of all controlled drugs was maintained and periodically reconciled on six (6)(Birch, Willow, Oak, Elm, Maple, and Cedar) of (6) six units reviewed. Specifically, the shift-to-shift staff signature form for controlled drugs, titled Shift Count, did not consistently include the signatures of staff members at each shift change, validating the correct narcotic count. This is evidenced by: The policy and procedure titled Narcotic Count, dated 8/2018, documented the on-coming and the off-going nurses assigned to the medication cart would be responsible for ensuring the accuracy of the controlled drug count. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF756Aug 19, 2025

    Based on record review and interview during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure a policy was developed for the monthly medication regimen review that included time frames for the different steps in the process. Specifically, the policy did not include time frames for the different steps the pharmacist must take when he or she identifies an irregularity that requires urgent action to protect the resident. This is evidenced by: The policy and procedure titled Medication Regimen Reviews (MRR) dated 7/19/2019 with no review or revision dates stated if the situation was serious enough to present a risk to a person's life, health, or safety, the Consultant Pharmacist would contact the Physician directly to report the information to the Physician. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF761Aug 19, 2025

    Based on observation and interviews conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored in accordance with professional standards of practice for two (2) (Cedar unit Side #2, [NAME] unit Side #1, ) of six (6) medication carts and two (2) (Elm unit #1 and #2 medication rooms) of six (6) medication rooms reviewed. Specifically, (a.) (1) (one) bottle of purified protein derivative (PPD) solution had no open and or expiration date; (b.) an opened insulin pen had no open and or expiration date; (c.) one (1) unopened insulin pen was stored improperly; (e.) stock medications in medication rooms had expired; (f.) opened stock medications were not dated; (g.) a resident specific medication was not dated and (h.) a medication cup… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF804Aug 19, 2025

    F804 Based on observation and interviews conducted during a recertification survey and abbreviated survey (Case #NY00596012), the facility did not ensure residents were provided food and drink that was palatable, flavorful, at an appetizing temperature for two (2) of two (2) meals reviewed (Lunch meals on 8/14/2025 and 8/15/2025). Specifically, food was not served at a palatable and appetizing temperature during the lunch meal on 8/14/2025 and 8/15/2025. This is evidenced by: During an observation on 8/11/2025 at 11:51 AM, meal trays were prepped by Dietary Aides in the unit kitchenette. During an interview on 8/07/2025 at 11:18 AM, Resident #239 stated the food was terrible, so they bought their own food. […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 73 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 19, 2025Standard and complaint15 findings
  • Sep 18, 2023Complaint3 findings
  • Apr 5, 2023Standard2 findings
  • Aug 12, 2022Complaint3 findings
  • Mar 22, 2022Infection control1 finding
  • Jan 13, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 28, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 9, 2021Infection control2 findings
Show the 16 earlier surveys
  • Nov 2, 2020Standard9 findings
  • Jan 13, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 8, 2019Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 23, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 27, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 13, 2019Standard9 findings
  • May 22, 2017Standard4 findings
  • Feb 24, 2016Standard3 findings
  • May 13, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 12, 2015Standard3 findings
  • Jun 23, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 2, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 28, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 16, 2014—2 findings
  • Nov 8, 2012—4 findings
  • Jul 20, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction