Santa Rosa Care Center
Tucson, Arizona · CCN 035004
22 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2021.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 84
- Surveys
- 22
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 144
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- THE ENSIGN GROUP
- County
- Pima
- Medicare-certified since
- 1980
- Ownership changed
- In the last 12 months
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 42 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Arizona.
Last survey on record
Feb 20, 2026
262 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.35 | 3.68 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.31 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 58.2% | 44.1% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Abuse icon
- Flagged by CMS on Care Compare
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G13.6% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1967.9% | E828.6% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6009×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
- F6452×
PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
- F6582×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F8122×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F8802×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Santa Rosa Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF760Aug 9, 2023
Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#99) was free of any significant medication error. The deficient practice could result in resident having adverse effects and complications. Findings include: Resident #99 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses included epilepsy, schizophrenia, heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, macular degeneration, and hypertension. The care plan dated 01/18/2022 revealed the resident had seizure disorder. The goal was that the resident will be free from injury related to seizure activity. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Mar 26, 2021
Based on staff interviews, clinical record review, facility documentation, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#304) received treatment and care in accordance with the resident's choice, regarding full code status. The deficient practice could result in residents' choices regarding code status not being implemented. Findings include: Resident #304 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . The Advanced Directive dated February 22, 2017 revealed the resident had chosen to be a Full Code, that he wanted his life to be prolonged to the greatest extent possible. Review of a physician's orders [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Aug 29, 2025
Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice has the potential to increase the risk of foodborne illness and compromise resident healthFindings Include:An initial kitchen observation was conducted on August 26, 2025 at 08:26 AM in conjunction with the Dietary Director, (Staff # 116). During observation of the food preparation area, two sanitizer buckets, one containing a dish rag, were observed in the food preparation area where a bowl of pudding/pie mix was being prepared. A portable, blue plastic fan was observed sitting on a metal rack, blowing across the food server's side of the tray line. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Aug 29, 2025
Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that food was served in accordance with professional standards of food service safety. The deficient practices could result in food-borne illnesses.Findings Include:An initial kitchen observation was conducted on August 26, 2025, at 08:26 AM in conjunction with the Dietary Director (Staff # 116). During observation of the food preparation area, two sanitizer buckets, one containing a dish rag, were observed in the food preparation area where a bowl of pudding/pie mix was being prepared. A portable, blue plastic fan was observed sitting on a metal rack, blowing across the food server's side of the tray line. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF600Jun 13, 2025
Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#235) were free from physical abuse resulting in injury by other residents (resident #205). The deficient practice could result in further incidents of resident to resident abuse. Findings include: -Resident #235 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that include Diabetes Mellitus type 2, Benign Prostatic hyperplasia, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Dementia, and Hypertension. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99 which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 84 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Feb 20, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Oct 31, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Aug 29, 2025Standard6 findings
- Jun 13, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Feb 7, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Dec 18, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Nov 1, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Oct 21, 2024Complaint1 finding
Show the 14 earlier surveys
- Sep 23, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Apr 1, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Oct 27, 2023Standard6 findings
- Aug 9, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- May 22, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Sep 1, 2022Standard and complaint5 findings
- Mar 26, 2021Standard and complaint15 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 25, 2019Standard and complaint4 findings
- Oct 5, 2017Standard5 findings
- Sep 14, 2016Standard4 findings
- Jun 5, 2015Standard and complaint15 findings
- Mar 27, 2014Standard and complaint6 findings
- Oct 27, 2011—5 findings
- Dec 21, 2010—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction