Deficiency Index

Life Care Center of Tucson

Tucson, Arizona · CCN 035140

25 surveys since 2010, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
125
Surveys
25
Harm or worse
5
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse5

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file14/25

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
162
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA
County
Pima
Medicare-certified since
1987

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
4
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 42 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Arizona.

Last survey on record

Jul 10, 2026

122 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.853.68
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.71—
Annual nurse turnover42.9%44.1%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$14,380 across 1 penalty
Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG12.0%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2854.9%E2141.2%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B12.0%C—
CMS’s current file: 51 of the 125 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6005×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F6773×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

  • F6843×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F5822×

    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Life Care Center of Tucson, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Jul 10, 2026

    Based on staff and resident interviews, review of facility documentation, clinical records and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (Resident #15) out of one sampled resident was free from preventable accident by failing to ensure appropriate safety measures during a transfer. The universe was sixty. The deficient practice could place other residents at risk for preventable falls and serous injury.Findings include: Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses that included a historical fracture of the right shoulder girdle and need for assistance with personal care. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed that the resident had a Brief Interview for mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating intact cognition. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF602Aug 15, 2025

    BBased on clinical record review, interviews, the State Agency's (SA) complaint portal, and review of the facility's policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure 4 out of 4 residents' (#47, #48, #52, and #53) medications were not misappropriated by nursing staff. The deficient practice resulted in the facility not keeping an accurate record of controlled substances. Findings include:Related to Resident #47-Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the right femur, generalized muscle weakness, stage 3 kidney disease and cognitive communication deficit.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #47 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scored a 12 which… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF584Jul 17, 2024

    Based on observation, staff interviews, facility documentation, policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure adequate and comfortable temperature levels was provided to meet the needs of 14 residents (#4, #5, #8, #11, #20, #25, #34, #35, #41, #42, #43, #48, #56, and #167). The deficient practice could result in the resident's room not having a homelike and comfortable environment. The facility census was 58 and the sample was 14. Findings include: On the morning of July 15, 2024, between the hours of 6:45 a.m. to 7:00 a.m., surveyors experienced a notable difference in temperature perceived and felt when entering the facility. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Jul 17, 2024

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy, the facility failed to ensure multiple food items were stored at safe temperatures in accordance with professional standards. This deficient practice could result in placing residents at risk for food-borne illnesses. The facility census was 58. Findings include: During an initial observation of the kitchen, conducted at 8:25 a.m. on July 14, 2024 with staff #15. In the walk-in refrigerator, the thermometers both inside and out registered a temperature displaying 45 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Inside the refrigerator were various food items including milk, eggs, yogurt, meat, cheese, and dressings. Staff #15 stated the temperatures are recorded on the log twice daily, morning and evening. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF906Jul 17, 2024

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the emergency and standby power systems were functioning properly. Failure to implement an emergency and standby power systems plan during an emergency could lead to harm of the patients and/or staff. Findings include: Based on record review and staff interview on July 17-18, 2024, the facility failed to ensure the emergency generator was adequate for the facility needs during an emergency. The facility has had a rental generator since March 2, 2020. On July 14, 2024 the facility experienced a power failure and the temporary generator failed to turn on leaving the facility totally without power. […]

Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 125 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 10, 2026Standard and complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Apr 23, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 5, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 18, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 15, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 17, 2024Standard and complaint10 findings
  • Feb 7, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 5, 2024Complaint4 findings
Show the 17 earlier surveys
  • Dec 7, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 20, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 14, 2023Standard8 findings
  • Aug 31, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 17, 2022Infection control1 finding
  • Mar 8, 2022Standard and complaint21 findings
  • Feb 23, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Sep 25, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 29, 2019Standard2 findings
  • Dec 27, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 14, 2016Standard3 findings
  • Jan 30, 2015Standard and complaint13 findings
  • Oct 3, 2013—12 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 13, 2012—12 findings
  • Apr 27, 2012—4 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 15, 2011—5 findings
  • Mar 5, 2010—15 findings · 2 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction