Deficiency Index

Sandgate Gardens Rehab and Nursing Center

Fort Pierce, Florida · CCN 105382

34 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2021.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
162
Surveys
34
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse1

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file28/34

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
107
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
ASTON HEALTH
County
St. Lucie
Medicare-certified since
1981

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
2
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 293 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Florida.

Last survey on record

Nov 3, 2025

371 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.523.57
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.49—
Annual nurse turnover57.6%44.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3680.0%E920.0%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 45 of the 162 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5612×

    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.

  • F5842×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6412×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

  • F6772×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

  • F6892×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Sandgate Gardens Rehab and Nursing Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686May 13, 2021

    Based on clinical and administrative record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #2), reviewed for pressure ulcers, received care consistent with professionals standards of practice to accurately assess, provide services to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent the development of new ulcers. This failure is evidenced by the facility failing to provide wound care evaluation and treatment by a qualified professional in a timely manner; and failed to perform the prescribed medical treatment for [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . The findings included: The facility's policy for Prevention and Management of Wounds, created July 1, 2017, was reviewed. The Policy did not have an identified last revision date. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF692Aug 6, 2026

    Based on policy review, observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide care and services for 5 of 11 sampled residents as evidenced by the failure to prevent significant weight loss and follow Physician and Registered Dietitian orders for weights for Resident #37 and #72 and failed to follow Physician and Registered Dietitian orders for weights for Residents #41, #59, and #5. The resident census at the time of survey was 102.The findings included: Review of the policy titled, Weight Assessment issued on 09/2022 and revised on 12/2024 revealed, in part, 1. With the resident's permission, the nursing staff will measure the resident weight within 72 hours of admission and monthly thereafter or as determined by the physician or per the resident's preference. #4. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF803Aug 6, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the portion sizes listed on the menu for regular and puree diets that were signed by the Registered Dietitian. This had the ability to affect 8 residents who were on the pureed diet and 66 on a regular diet. The census at the time of survey was 102. The findings included: Observations were made on 08/04/26 at 11:50 AM in the kitchen of the lunch tray line. A review of the menu for week 5 Tuesday lunch menu revealed the puree menu included 6-ounce (oz) puree chicken parmesan, 4 oz puree pasta, 4 oz puree Italian Vegetables, 2-oz puree roll with garlic butter and 4-oz puree apple cobbler. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF803Apr 18, 2025

    Based on observation, menu review, and interview, the facility failed to follow the menu for 1 of 2 observed meals (lunch on 04/16/25) affecting 96 of 99 resident who consume food orally. The findings included: Review of the menu for the lunch meal on 04/16/25 documented the following menu items. The following observations were made on the tray line in the kitchen on 04/16/25 beginning at 11:30 AM: a) The menu for the regular Philly Beef sandwich was documented to include a cheese sauce made with a cheese sauce mix and hot water. The observed sandwiches, prepared by the cook for the regular and mechanical soft diets, was topped with shredded cheese. b) The menu for the regular lunch meal was to contain a parsley sprig for garnish. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF805Apr 18, 2025

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the form of food met the needs of residents who consume pureed and mechanical soft foods for 1 of 2 meals observed (lunch on 04/16/25), affecting sampled Residents #69, #31, #82, and #30 who consume pureed foods, and affecting sampled Residents #59, #2, #73, #12, and #58 who consume mechanical soft foods. This practice had the potential to affect 12 of 99 residents who consume pureed foods, and 20 of 99 residents who consume mechanical soft foods (20). The findings included: An observation of the lunch meal on 04/16/25 revealed the main entree was a Phili Beef Sandwich. […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 162 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 6, 2026Standard10 findings
  • Nov 3, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 18, 2025Standard17 findings
  • Jan 15, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 21, 2023Standard14 findings
  • Aug 31, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • May 25, 2023Infection control1 finding
  • Jan 10, 2023Complaint1 finding
Show the 26 earlier surveys
  • Aug 25, 2022Standard and complaint11 findings
  • Sep 2, 2021Standard12 findings
  • May 13, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Feb 26, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 25, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 16, 2020Standard and complaint5 findings
  • Apr 5, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 22, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 16, 2018Standard and complaint15 findings
  • Dec 27, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 5, 2017Standard and complaint11 findings
  • Dec 20, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 16, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 11, 2016Standard2 findings
  • Jun 24, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 22, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 9, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 18, 2015Standard9 findings
  • Jun 12, 2014Standard8 findings
  • Jun 6, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 11, 2013—1 finding
  • Apr 11, 2013—11 findings
  • Oct 12, 2012—3 findings
  • Apr 12, 2012—8 findings
  • Sep 27, 2011—1 finding
  • Mar 23, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction