San Juan Nursing Home, Inc.
San Juan, Texas · CCN 455484
33 surveys since 2011, 6 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 170
- Surveys
- 33
- Harm or worse
- 6
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 114
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Hidalgo
- Medicare-certified since
- 1984
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=19, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Jun 18, 2026
144 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.35 | 3.21 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.30 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 45.1% | 44.7% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D763.6% | E436.4% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F7612×
Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
- F6371×
Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
- F6441×
Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
- F6551×
Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
- F6561×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at San Juan Nursing Home, Inc., in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF637Dec 11, 2025
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete a significant change MDS assessment within 14 days after a significant change in the resident's mental and physical condition for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #12, #4, and #2) reviewed for assessments.1. The facility failed to complete a Significant Change in Status MDS Assessment after Resident #12 admitted to hospice services on [DATE].2. The facility failed to complete a Significant Change in Status MDS Assessment after Resident #2 had four new diagnoses changes: Klebsiella Pneumoniae ([DATE]), Urinary Tract Infection (UTI [DATE]), Do Not Resuscitate (DNR [DATE]), and Pleural Effusion ([DATE]).3. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF644Dec 11, 2025
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) program to the maximum extent practicable to avoid duplicative testing and effort for 5 of 16 residents reviewed for PASRR. (Residents #2, 7, 8, 9, and 11) 1. The facility failed to refer Resident #2 for PASRR Level II assessment when the facility incorrectly coded his PASRR Level I assessment. 2. The facility failed to refer Resident #7 for PASRR Level II assessment when the facility incorrectly coded her PASRR Level I assessment. 3. The facility failed to refer Resident #8 for PASRR review following new mental illness diagnosis. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Dec 11, 2025
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed and 1 of 1 nutrition rooms for storage, preparation, and sanitation. The facility failed to discard damaged pans and utensils. The facility failed to keep food products in the refrigerators and freezers sealed properly. The facility failed to follow a cleaning schedule. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness. Findings include: Initial tour and observation of the kitchen on 12/09/24, beginning at 8:15 am revealed 4 of 7 non-stick type coated frying pans were flaking. Three of the pans were completely bare, except for the sides. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF761Sep 6, 2024
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable in 7 of 12 boxes of medical supplies (200 hallway) reviewed for medication storage and labeling. The facility failed to ensure7 boxes of medical supplies in the medication storage room, on the 200 hallway, had current usage dates and expired supplies were stored along with current medications/supplies. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving expired medical supplies, wound dressings that past expiration date would not have the intended therapeutic level or effect on a resident's wound. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF659Jun 18, 2026
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that care and services were provided by qualified persons in accordance with the written plan of care for 1 or 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for qualified persons.The facility failed to provide direct supervision to a student nurse while the student nurse administered a gastrostomy tube bolus feeding. This failure could place residents with a G-tube at risk of abdominal discomfort, aspiration, and decreased quality of life.Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 06/17/26 revealed an original admission date of 02/01/22 and admission date of 04/08/24. […]
Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 170 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 18, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Dec 11, 2025Standard6 findings
- Sep 6, 2024Standard3 findings
- Jun 2, 2023Standard1 finding
- Jul 6, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Mar 3, 2022Standard3 findings
- Feb 26, 2021Standard4 findings
- Nov 30, 2020Complaint1 finding
Show the 25 earlier surveys
- Sep 14, 2020Complaint7 findings
- Feb 20, 2020Complaint3 findings
- Jan 23, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Nov 18, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Oct 3, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Aug 30, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Jul 25, 2019Standard13 findings
- Aug 2, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Jun 8, 2018Standard19 findings
- Mar 29, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Feb 15, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Dec 11, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Sep 26, 2017Complaint5 findings
- Apr 28, 2017Standard15 findings
- Feb 16, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Oct 12, 2016Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
- Sep 6, 2016Complaint4 findings · 2 harm
- May 5, 2016Standard and complaint11 findings
- May 14, 2015Standard10 findings
- Feb 3, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Oct 21, 2014Complaint2 findings
- May 7, 2014Standard8 findings
- Apr 24, 2013—17 findings
- Apr 12, 2012—4 findings
- Apr 7, 2011—11 findings · 2 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction