Every finding on record at Sabetha Manor

The facility had a census of 24 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in a sanitary manner for the residents who reside in the facility and receive meals from the facility kitchen.Findings included:- On 01/20/26 at 07:30 AM, during the initial tour of the kitchen, Dietary Staff (DS) BB was preparing breakfast and wore a hair net covering with approximately six inches of brown hair hanging out of the hairnet on each side of the face.On 01/21/26 at 11:45 AM, DS BB assisted in preparing lunch, chopping lettuce and pureeing entrees, without hair being contained in a hairnet on each side of her face six inches on each side of her face. DS CC also prepared the lunch meal. DS CC put on clean gloves, touched the facial mask to adjust it with the palm of his hands, then retrieved a tub of shredded cheese to top the main course of Shepard's Pie. DS CC had not changed gloves, touched the refrigerator handle, removed the container of shredded cheese, opened the oven door, pulled the pan from the oven with a potholder, then reached into the shredded cheese container and spread cheese on top of the main dish. DS CC used unclean gloves to obtain baked rolls from a pan and placed the rolls on the plate of the residents during plating the meal items. The kitchen had two fans mounted on the wall above the ice machine and the food prep area, stove, and grill. The fan pointing at the meal prep area was on and blowing. Both fans had brown, grey debris that was present on the fan's blade covers.On 01/21/26 at 12:57 PM, DS BB and Administrative Staff A verified hair should be contained in the hair covering, fans should be clean and free of debris, and DS CC should have changed gloves between tasks and touched the face mask.The facility's Dietary Employee Personal Hygiene policy, dated 01/22/26, required the facility to utilize the following as guidelines for employee personal hygiene to prevent contamination of food by foodservice employees. Gloves were to be worn and changed appropriately to reduce the spread of infection. All dietary staff must wear hair restraints to prevent hair from contacting food.

The facility had a census of 24 residents and one kitchen. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to employ a full-time Certified Dietary Manager for the residents who reside in the facility and receive their meals from the kitchen.Findings included:- On 01/20/26 at 07:30 AM, during the initial tour of the kitchen, Dietary Staff (DS) BB was present in the kitchen preparing breakfast. DS BB identified herself as the Dietary Manager. DS BB stated she was not certified.On 01/21/26 at 11:45 AM, DS BB chopped lettuce and prepared the pureed meal for one resident.On 01/21/26 at 12:57 PM, Administrative Staff A reported that the facility checked with an institute regarding DS BB becoming certified, but DS BB had not been enrolled in the course.The facility's Dietary Service-Staffing policy, reviewed 01/22/26, documented that the facility employs sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to carry out the functions of the Food and Nutrition Services, taking into consideration resident reassessments, individual plan of care, and the number, acuity, and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment. The facility will employ a qualified dietitian or other clinically qualified nutrition professional on a full-time, part-time, or consultant basis.

The facility had a census of 24 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store drugs and biological medications appropriately in the medication cart and medication room.Findings included:- On 01/20/26 at 10:08 AM, the medication storage observation in the medication room of stock medications with Certified Medication Aide (CMA) S contained an opened bottle of Folic Acid 400 micrograms (mcg) with an expired date of 02/25 and Vitamin E 180 milligrams (mg) with an expired date of 09/25. CMA S verified the expired dates on the bottles of Folic Acid and Vitamin E.On 01/20/26 at 10:10 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) H reported that the CMAs kept track of the expired medications on the medication cart. LN H stated that stock medications were reviewed for expiration dates by nursing administration.On 01/21/26 at 03:10 PM, Consultant GG stated that the consultant pharmacist helped check for expired medications. Consultant GG reported that the medication room should be checked weekly.The facility's Medication Storage policy, reviewed 01/22/26, documented that the facility ensures all medications housed on the premises would be stored in the pharmacy and/or medication rooms according to the manufacturer's recommendations and sufficient to ensure proper sanitation, temperature, light, ventilation, moisture control, segregation, and security. The pharmacy and all medication rooms are routinely inspected by the consultant pharmacist for discontinued, outdated, defective, or deteriorated medications with worn, illegible, or missing labels. These medications are destroyed in accordance with the Destruction of Unused Drug Policy.

The facility identified a census of 26 residents. The sample included four residents, with four residents reviewed for misappropriation of medications. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1, R2, R3, and R4 remained free from misappropriation of medications. This deficient practice had the risk for missed medications and further misappropriation of medications for the affected residents.Findings included:- R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented an order with a start date of 05/24/25 for oxycodone (narcotic pain medication) five milligrams (mg) every 12 hours as needed (PRN) for breakthrough pain.R2's EMR documented an order with a start date of 02/24/25 for oxycodone five mg two times a day for pain.R3's EMR documented an order with a start date of 05/01/25 for fludrocortisone (corticosteroid medication used to treat pain and inflammation) 0.1 mg one time a day for hyperkalemia (high levels of potassium in the blood).R4's EMR documented an order with a start date of 11/26/24 for fludrocortisone 0.1 mg in the morning for corticosteroid.The facility's Investigation dated 06/03/25, documented on 05/26/25 around 06:35 PM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G and LN H completed narcotic count at change of shift and noted a small piece of tape on the back of the bubble pack. LN H notified Administrative Nurse D and Administrative Nurse E, who both arrived at the facility to investigate. Upon investigation, the facility noted a narcotic medication bubble pack had been tampered with, which involved a slit in the foil and a small piece of tape placed on the back of the bubble pack. R1's oxycodone was tampered with, and she missed eight tablets of oxycodone, which had been replaced with fludrocortisone tablets. R2's oxycodone was tampered with, and she missed 21 tablets of oxycodone, which had been replaced with fludrocortisone tablets. R3 was missing 16 tablets of fludrocortisone. R4 was missing eight tablets of fludrocortisone. The facility followed the narcotic count policy, but the minute change in the medication card was difficult to detect. The facility immediately started investigating, which included drug testing all staff who passed medications or were licensed nurses. The facility notified the police and immediately replaced the medications. The facility reviewed 24-hour video surveillance and noted suspicious footage of Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R. On 05/28/25, CMA R arrived for work, and the facility asked her to go to Administrative Staff A's office to meet with Administrative Staff A and Administrative Nurse D. The facility showed CMA R the video surveillance, and she offered no explanation of her actions on camera. The facility asked CMA R what she was doing in the video, and she responded that she did not know. The facility suspended CMA R pending investigation and later terminated her that day for refusing to provide information regarding the investigation.Upon request, the facility provided a timeline of the video surveillance, and Administrative Staff A confirmed on 07/24/25 at 02:18 PM that the video surveillance timeline only involved CMA R.The timeline documented on 05/21/25 at 11:37 AM, CMA R removed a medication card from the second drawer and popped medications out of the card. She moved the medical tape to the corner of the medication room, then retrieved something from the trash can. She put a new narcotic medication card into the narcotic box and retrieved a narcotic medication card from the narcotic box, and placed it on top of the medication cart. CMA R stood in the corner of the medication room with the medication card, then reopened the medication drawer and popped more medications out before returning the medication card in the corner. CMA R grabbed a spoon, put the medication card back in the drawer, grabbed a medication cup, then went to the bathroom. On 05/22/25 at 06:40 AM, CMA R opened the narcotic box in the medication cart and set a medication card on top of the medication cart. CMA R went into the corner of the medication room with the medication card then slipped a medication cup into her pocket. On 05/24/25 at 06:47 AM, CMA R opened the narcotic box and pulled a medication card out then went to the corner of the medication room. She grabbed a medication cup then put her cupped hand in her pocket and went to the bathroom. On 05/25/25 at 03:00 PM, CMA R grabbed a medication card from the second drawer and popped pills out with a spoon. She then taped the back of the card with medical tape and returned the card to the second drawer. On 05/26/25 at 06:40 AM, CMA R took a narcotic medication card out of the narcotic box and placed it on top of the medication cart. She retrieved something from the trash can then went to the bathroom. On 05/26/25 at 07:19 AM, CMA R retrieve a narcotic medication out of the narcotic box and popped the medication out of the bubble pack before returning the card to the narcotic drawer of the medication cart.On 07/17/25 at 01:08 PM, R4 laid in bed with her eyes closed.On 07/17/25 at 01:13 PM, R3 sat in her recliner in her room. She stated the facility told her that her medications had been taken, but she had no concerns from the incident.On 07/17/25 at 01:15 PM, R1 sat in her wheelchair in the day area and played bingo with other residents.On 07/17/25 at 01:15 PM, R2 sat in her wheelchair in the day area and played bingo with other residents.On 07/17/25 at 11:17 AM, Administrative Staff A stated the medication diversion was with the county attorney at that time, and the facility had a suspect. She stated the facility sent CMA R a certified letter to her to get a witness statement, but received no response. Administrative Staff A stated that when the facility interviewed her during the investigation and asked CMA R what she was doing in the video, CMA R responded with she did not know.On 07/17/25 at 12:25 PM, Administrative Staff A stated the facility did not do abuse, neglect, and exploitation (ANE) education immediately after the incident because it was an isolated incident. She stated the facility watched the surveillance video and saw that CMA R stood with her back turned to the camera, brought the tape over, and pulled narcotic medication cards from the narcotic box. She stated they were able to see CMA R do something with her hand in the video and put something into her pocket. Administrative Staff A stated the facility did not do ANE education immediately after the incident because they knew who did it. She stated they did change the process for narcotic count.On 07/17/25 at 12:37 PM, Administrative Staff A stated the facility completed ANE education at the last in-service on 07/02/25.On 07/17/25 at 01:24 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated the facility completed ANE training recently. She stated the facility figured out quickly who had diverted the medications, and they did not think about doing ANE education immediately after. Administrative Nurse D stated the facility provided education on narcotic count to the nurses, and the facility completed random audits of the narcotic medications.On 07/17/25 at 01:25 PM, Administrative Nurse E stated she remembered Administrative Staff A going over the ANE policy at the last in-service, and misappropriation of medications was on the policy.On 07/17/25 at 01:57 PM, Administrative Nurse E stated she expected staff to count the medications and check the narcotic cards. She stated she expected staff to bring it to her attention if there was a discrepancy. Administrative Nurse E stated she expected staff not to misappropriate medications.On 07/24/25 at 03:09 PM, CMA R was unavailable for an interview.On 07/24/25 at 03:14 PM, CMA S was unavailable for an interview.On 07/24/25 at 03:16 PM, LN G stated on 05/26/25 during shift change narcotic count, LN H noticed a narcotic medication card looked smashed, so they turned the card around and saw tiny pieces of tape where somebody had popped the medication out and replaced it. She stated they notified Administrative Nurse D and Administrative Nurse E and they both went to the facility to investigate. LN G stated they checked the narcotic cards and discovered the oxycodone tablets were not oxycodone, but they looked like oxycodone. She stated she received education on the proper way to count the medications, including flipping the cards over. LN G stated she prevented misappropriation of medications by making sure the count was correct and flipping the cards over with both people counting.The facility's Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Policy and Procedure, dated May 2023, directed the facility to ensure all residents remained free of physical abuse, emotional abuse, sexual abuse, neglectful treatment, exploitation of residents, and misappropriation of funds and resources.The facility put the following corrective actions into place prior to the onsite visit with a compliance date of 07/02/25:The facility drug tested all nurses and CMAs prior to their next shift from 05/26/25 to 05/30/25.The facility reported the missing medications to police on 05/26/25.The facility completed narcotic count policy education with all nurses and CMAs from 05/26/25 to 05/30/25.The facility replaced and paid for the missing medications for R1, R2, R3, and R4 on 05/27/25.The facility suspended and then terminated CMA R on 05/28/25.The facility completed ANE training with all staff on 07/02/25.This deficient practice was cited at past noncompliance. The scope and severity remain a E.

The facility identified a census of 29 residents. The sample included three residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse between staff and Resident (R) 1 and an injury of unknown origin for R1 to the State Agency (SA) as required. This deficient practice placed R1 at risk for unidentified and ongoing abuse. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented a diagnosis of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion) without behavioral disturbance. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 which indicated intact cognition. R1 had no behaviors. R1 was dependent on staff assistance for activities of daily living (ADLs) except she required substantial/maximal assistance for upper body dressing. R1 received antiplatelet (medications that prevent platelets from sticking together and forming blood clots) medications. The Functional Abilities Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 03/18/24, documented R1 was dependent on staff assistance for all ADLs and mobility except upper body dressing. R1's Care Plan, dated 05/24/16, documented an intervention, dated 06/27/23, that directed R1 wore arm-protecting sleeves that were applied when she woke up and were removed before she went to bed, R1 had bruising on both upper extremities due to thin skin and medications she took. R1's Care Plan, dated 05/24/16, documented an intervention, last revised on 08/12/21, that directed R1 was unable to dress herself at times and preferred staff to assist her with all of her dressing needs. In an undated Witness Statement, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M stated that on 06/21/24 around 07:00 AM, she checked on R1 to see if the resident wanted to get up for breakfast and R1 declined. Around 10:00 AM, R1's hospice nurse went to the nurse's station and asked about two big bruises on R1's left arm and if the staff knew how they got there. CNA M stated she told the hospice nurse she knew about the bruises on R1's right arm but not the ones on her left arm. CNA M stated she also told the hospice nurse that at times CNA N could be rough when transferring and rolling residents. In an undated Witness Statement, Licensed Nurse (LN) G stated on 06/21/24, R1's hospice nurse reported bruising on R1's left arm and asked LN G if R1 had a fall. According to R1's progress notes, she did not have a fall and the bruising was of unknown origin. LN G assessed R1's left arm and noted two large bruises with many smaller bruises present. The main bruises measured 7.5 centimeters (cm) by 4.5 cm and nine cm by 4.5 cm. The facility's investigation, dated 06/22/24, documented on 06/21/24 at approximately 11:17 AM, Administrative Staff A received a phone call from R1's hospice nurse who reported she noted increased bruising to R1's left arm and reported that a CNA stated the bruising may have been caused by CNA N being rough when turning R1. CNA N was immediately suspended, and the investigation was begun. On 06/20/24 at 02:35 PM, LN H noted scattered bruising on R1's arm. At approximately 10:00 AM on 06/21/24, the amount of bruising had increased on the left arm. As per R1's Care Plan, R1 was known to have scattered bruising on her arms. Regarding CNA M. who made a statement regarding CNA N, CNA M stated she was having a bad day and spouted off to the hospice nurse about CNA N but she had not witnessed CNA N being rough on 06/21/24. CNA N denied any rough handling of R1 and recited the proper interventions per R1's plan of care. There were no concerns noted regarding CNA N's treatment of residents. In an interview with CNA O, she stated that she and CNA P assisted R1 into the shower chair on 06/20/24 at 09:30 AM. CNA O stated R1 was leaning to the left while in the shower chair which was hard plastic and they attempted to correct the lean as much as possible using the lift sling. In an interview with CNA P, she stated she was called into the shower house by CNA O to assist with R1 who was leaning in her shower chair. CNA P stated R1 was leaning on her left arm on the shower chair, and they assisted R1 to off-load the left arm and correct R1's positioning in the shower chair. In conclusion, the investigation did not indicate concerns regarding abuse or neglect. The cause of the bruising was determined to be related to pressure from leaning on the shower chair combined with the fragile skin and long-term use of blood thinners. The investigation lacked evidence the facility reported the allegation of abuse to the SA. R1's EMR revealed a Nurses Note on 06/21/24 at 10:49 AM that documented the hospice nurse reported bruising on R1's left arm. The bruising was of unknown origin and was a mix of black and purple. The main bruises were 7.5 cm by 4.5 cm and nine cm by 4.5 cm. The hospice nurse said she had to report bruising due to it being of unknown origin. On 07/02/24 at 12:44 PM, R1 sat in her Broda chair (specialized wheelchair with the ability to tilt and recline) with Geri-sleeves (protective sleeves) in place. She stated she did not recall any bruising and felt safe in the facility. On 07/02/24 at 11:29 AM, Administrative Staff A stated the facility did not find any abuse with R1 and did not report the allegation and bruising to the SA. On 07/02/24 at 12:54 PM, CNA Q stated she reported any new bruising or injuries of unknown origin to the nurse immediately. She stated R1 mostly leans to her left side in her wheelchair. On 07/02/24 at 12:57 PM, LN G stated for any new bruising she checked the charting for the bruising, asked around to see if anybody knew what happened, completed risk management, and notified Administrative Nurse D. On 07/02/24 at 01:01 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated she expected CNAs to notify the charge nurse if they found new bruising and she expected the charge nurse to assess the bruising and try to figure out how it happened then notify her of the bruising. She stated she notified Administrative Staff A to let her know what was going on and do an investigation if the bruising was of unknown origin. Administrative Nurse D stated the facility reported to the SA injuries of unknown origin if the investigation could not determine where the bruising or injury came from. She stated the timeframe for reporting to the SA was 24 hours or two hours depending on what it was. Administrative Nurse D stated if an allegation was brought to her, she made sure the resident was safe, suspended the staff if there was a name in the allegation, and started an investigation. Administrative Nurse D stated she would report abuse to the SA only if the investigation concluded there was possible abuse. On 07/02/24 at 01:10 PM, Administrative Staff A stated she expected CNAs to tell the charge nurse of any new bruising or injuries of unknown origin who then notified her or Administrative Nurse D. She stated she then launched an investigation, if there was a suspicion of abuse, the employee was suspended pending investigation. She interviewed residents and staff and looked in the chart for any notes on when the bruising appeared. Administrative Staff A stated she reported to the SA if there was a finding of abuse or neglect. She stated the investigation on R1's bruising did not find any abuse, so it was not reported to the SA. The facility's Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Policy and Procedure, updated 03/31/20, documented that any report of neglect or abuse made by a resident, family member, visitor, or employee was investigated within 24 hours. The Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), or designee was notified immediately of the report. The investigation was conducted by the Administrator, DON, or any member of the administrative staff. The Administrator contacted the SA within 24 hours of the incident unless the incident met the definition of a crime against a person or resulted in serious bodily injury then the report was made directly to law enforcement and the SA no later than two hours after forming the suspicion. The investigation of the alleged or suspected violations was completed and submitted to the SA within five days. The facility failed to report an allegation of abuse and an injury of unknown origin for R1 to the SA. This deficient practice placed R1 at risk for unresolved and ongoing abuse.

The facility had a census of 25 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to have the required members participate and attend Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings at least quarterly for the quality assurance program. This placed the 25 residents who resided in the facility at risk for decreased quality of care. Findings included: - On 03/20/24 at 11:00 AM, the QAPI committee sign-in sheets for quarterly meetings lacked a Director of Nursing and Infection Preventionist on the committee on 03/07/24, 01/23/24, 11/28/23, and 09/26/23. On 03/20/24 at 11:10 AM, Administrative Staff A verified the facility did not employ a full-time Director of Nursing or an Infection Preventionist. The facility's undated Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Plan (QAPI) policy documented the facility's Quality Assurance Committee should consist of a Director of Nursing and an Infection Preventionist. The facility failed to have the required members attend and participate at least quarterly in the QAPI program. This placed the residents in the facility at risk for decreased quality of care.

The facility had a census of 25 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility employed a designated staff person for the Infection Preventionist (IP) who was responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) and who completed the specialized training in infection prevention and control. This placed the residents at increased risk for infections. Findings included: - On 03/13/24 at 09:00 AM, during the initial entrance conference Administrative Staff A verified the facility did not have an IP. On 03/18/24 at 10:00 AM, Nurse Consultant GG verified she had been tracking infections, but the facility did not employ an onsite IP. The facility' Infection Preventionist undated policy, documented the facility will employ one or more qualified individuals with responsibility for implementing the facility's infection prevention and control program. The facility will ensure the Infection Preventionist is qualified by education, training, and certification. Develop and implement an ongoing infection prevention and control program to recognize and control the onset and spread of infections to provide safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment-wide systems for the prevention, identification, reporting, investigation, and control of infections and communicable diseases of residents, staff, and visitors. Oversight of and ensuring the requirements are met for the facility's antibiotic stewardship program. Review and or revise the facility's infection prevention and control program its standards, policies, and procedures annually and as needed for changes to the facility assessment to ensure they are effective and in accordance with current standards of practice for preventing and controlling infections. Provide infection control training for staff. The facility failed to employ a designated staff person as the Infection Preventionist who possessed the required certification, placing the residents at increased risk for infections.

The facility had a census of 25 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to submit complete and accurate staffing information through Payroll Based Journaling (PBJ) as required. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for unidentified and ongoing inadequate nurse staffing. Findings included: - The PBJ report provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2023 Quarter 4 and FY 2024 Quarters 1 indicated the facility did not have licensed nurse coverage 24 hours a day, seven days a week on multiple (15) dates. A review of the facility licensed nurse timeclock data for the dates listed on the PBJ revealed a licensed nurse was on duty for 24 hours a day seven days a week. On 03/20/24 AM, observation revealed a registered nurse on duty in the facility. On 03/18/24 at 11:50 AM, Consultant Nurse (CN) GG stated she helped with reporting data to CMS for the payroll-based data. CN GG said when she looked at her documentation regarding the information she reported it showed the information was reported correctly, so she was not sure why CMS records were different. The facility's Payroll-Based Journal Policy,' revised February 2023, documented the facility would electronically submit timely to Centers of Medicare/Medicaid Services (CMS) complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS. The facility failed to submit accurate PBJ data which placed the residents at risk for unidentified and ongoing inadequate staffing.

The facility had a census of 25 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when staff stored unlabeled, undated, expired food in the refrigerators. This placed the 25 residents who received their meals from the facility's kitchen at risk for foodborne illness. Findings included: - On [DATE] at 09:00 AM, observation in the kitchen revealed the following: A white refrigerator/freezer had seven 4-ounce vanilla Mighty Shakes with an expiration date of [DATE]. A two-door silver refrigerator had an unsealed package of yellow cheese slices. On [DATE] at 09:05 AM, Social Service X verified the above findings and discarded the food item in the trash. On [DATE] at 9:15 AM the white upright refrigerator /freezer, located in the dining room, had eight 7-ounce Ensure Plus high protein strawberry containers with an expiration date of [DATE] and three Ensure original 7-ounce containers with an expiration date of [DATE] in the freezer. Social Service X verified the Ensure products were expired and stated staff should discard expired food items. Social Service X discarded the items in the trash. On [DATE] at 10:48 AM, observation during a follow-up to the kitchen revealed: The mopboard around the edge of the kitchen had a black substance on it. Underneath the steam table in the outside corner, the mopboard was coming away from the wall approximately one-half inch (in) to 1 in. The edge of the oven hood had numerous areas of varying size where the paint was peeling. The bottom and top cabinets located across from the ovens had numerous areas with the top layer of wood missing. Three lower cabinet drawers below the toaster had eight screw holes with screws sunk inside of the hole. The three lower cabinet drawers to the left of the sink had nine screw holes with the same screws sunk inside. The cabinet below the coffee pot had a missing cupboard door and the bottom shelf inside the cabinet had a missing top layer of wood approximately 1.5 in by one-eighth in. Underneath the ice machine were four plastic blue gowns in plastic packages, and a plastic cup lid. The legs underneath the counter where the dirty dishes go in were rusted from top to bottom, The pipe starting underneath the dishwasher to the garbage disposal, approximately 18 inches long, had numerous areas of brown substance. The board above the sink located across from the ovens, above the window, had an area of approximately 18 in. by 4.5 in with a missing top layer of wood. On [DATE] at 10:30 AM, Dietary Manager (DM) BB verified the above findings with the issues in the kitchen and stated she would notify maintenance about the oven hood and cupboard issues. DM BB said staff have a daily cleaning they should be doing, but the kitchen had been short-staffed. The facility's Dietary Cleaning Procedures Policy, undated, documented the facility would store, prepare, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions to ensure that proper sanitation and food handling practices to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illnesses. The procedure instructed staff on how and what cleaning to do in the kitchen. The facility kitchen staff failed to prepare, store, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This placed the 25 residents who received their food from the facility's kitchen at risk for foodborne illness.

The facility had a census of 25 residents. The sample included 12 residents and one kitchen. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to employ a full-time certified dietary manager for the 25 residents who resided in the facility and received meals from the facility kitchen. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate nutrition. Findings included: - On 03/13/24 at 11:00 AM, the noon meal consisted of grilled sausage cuts, German potato salad, sauerkraut with bacon, and cookies. On 03/13/24 at 11:30 AM, observation revealed Dietary Staff BB in the kitchen preparing the noon meal. On 03/13/24 at 11:35 AM, Dietary Staff BB verified she was not a certified dietary manager. Dietary Staff BB stated she was on the last section of the dietary manager class. On 03/13/24 at 09:51 AM, Administrative Staff A verified Dietary Staff BB did not have a dietary manager certification. The facility's Dietary Services-Staffing Policy, revised February 2023, documented the facility would employ a qualified dietitian or other clinically qualified nutrition professional on a full-time, part-time, or consultant basis. The facility failed to employ a full time certified dietary manager for 25 residents who resided in the facility and received meals from the kitchen. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate nutrition.

The facility had a census of 25 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide Registered Nurse (RN) coverage eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week and failed to employ a full-time Director of Nursing (DON) placing all residents who resided in the facility at risk for decreased quality of care. Findings included: - A review of the August, September, and October 2023 nursing schedule revealed there was not an RN for eight consecutive hours on the following dates: 08/07/23, 09/07/23, 09/13/23, 09/14/23, 09/16/23, 09/17/23, 09/20/23, 09/28/23, 10/03-5/23, 10/09/23, 10/10/23, and 10/11/23. On 03/13/24 at 09:00 AM, during the initial entrance conference Administrative Staff A verified the facility did not have a current DON but there was a Registered Nurse that had been at the facility for a long time that was in charge. On 03/18/24 at 11:50 AM, Administration Staff A brought in a handwritten list of dates from 08/07/23 to 09/20/23 and stated the hours were when the previous director of nursing served as the eight-consecutive-hour RN. Administrative Staff A was unable to provide any verifiable documentation for those dates. Administrative Staff A verified the lack of RN coverage on 09/28/23 and the October dates listed above. The facility's Nursing Services-Registered Nurse (RN) Policy, revised in February 2023, documented the facility would utilize the services of an RN for at least eight consecutive hours per day, seven days per week. The facility would designate an RN to serve as the Director of Nursing on a full-time basis. The facility failed to provide RN coverage eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week and failed to employ a full-time DON placing the residents who resided in the facility at risk of decreased quality of care.

The facility had a census of 25 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to check the food temperatures of pureed (an eating plan where all the foods have a soft, pudding-like consistency) foods and the regular breakfast food items before serving to ensure the appropriate food temperature for food safety and palatability. This placed the residents at risk for food-borne illness and impaired palatability. Findings included: - On 03/14/24 at 12:05 PM, Dietary Manager (DM) BB stated the facility had two residents on a fully pureed and one with pureed meat only. Observation revealed DM BB placed two 4-ounce scoops of sauerkraut into a blender, added one teaspoon (tsp) of chicken broth, and blended to the consistency of mashed potatoes. DM BB placed the sauerkraut on a plastic divided plate on the counter next to the microwave and covered it with a room tray lid. DM BB then ran the blender container through the dishwasher, brought it back to the counter, placed two 4-ounce scoops of German potato salad into the blender container, and then blended it. DM BB added chicken broth a little at a time until the potato salad was the consistency of pudding. Observation revealed DM BB placed the potato salad into a different section of the same plate the sauerkraut was on, then covered it with the lid. DM BB used the same procedure to clean the blender container and then placed three 4-ounce scoops of sausage pieces into the blender, added chicken broth, and blended to the consistency of mashed potatoes. DM BB then placed one scoop into a different section of each plate on the counter, with the other pureed food items. Further observation revealed at 12:11 PM, DM BB handed a dietary staff the pureed diet plate. After the survey team intervened and requested a temperature for the food items, the items were assessed, and the following inadequate temperatures were noted: pureed sausage at 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F), potatoes at 120 degrees F, and sauerkraut at 120 degrees F. DM BB stated she typically does not leave the food plate on the counter as she did during the observation but did not confirm whether she assessed food temperatures on pureed food items routinely before serving. The Food Temp Sheet, for January, February, and March 2024 revealed no food temperatures were assessed and recorded for breakfast food items every day. The sheet lacked pureed food temperatures for breakfast, lunch, and supper, every day. On 03/18/24 at 10:16 AM, DM BB stated dietary staff do not check breakfast food temperature because the food is made to order. DM BB said the sausage gravy was in the refrigerator, and the staff placed it in a microwave for about two minutes, and that made it hot. DM BB verified the above Food Temp Sheets lacked evidence that pureed food temperatures were assessed due to there being no column to record them. The facility's Record of Food Temperatures Policy, revised February 2023, documented food temperatures would be checked on all items prepared in the dietary department. Hot foods would be held at 135 degrees Fahrenheit or greater. Measure and record the temperatures for each food product and milk at all meals and record the temperature on the temperature log. The facility dietary staff failed to measure, and record pureed and breakfast food item temperatures before serving them. This placed the residents at risk for foodborne illness and impaired palatability.

The facility had a census of 25 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one reviewed for hospitalization . Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a written notice for a facility-initiated transfer to Resident (R) 14, or her representative, when she was transferred to the hospital and failed to notify the Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO-a public official who works to resolve resident issues in nursing facilities) of the discharge. This placed the resident at risk for uninformed care choices. Findings included: - R14's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R14 had a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing). R14's Medicare Five Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented R14 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R14 required maximal to partial staff assistance with most activities of daily living (ADLs). R14's Care Plan, revised 12/21/23, documented R14 required continuous oxygen, and instructed staff to check R14's oxygen saturation every shift and as needed (PRN) and monitor for changes in R14's breathing patterns. The Progress Note, dated 02/05/2024 at 03:44 PM, documented R14 was admitted to the hospital. A review of R14's clinical record lacked evidence the resident or representative was provided written notice when he was transferred to the hospital. The facility was unable to provide evidence the LTCO was notified of the transfer. On 12/27/23 at 3:06 PM, observation revealed R14 sat in a recliner in her room with oxygen on per nasal cannula. 03/20/24 at 09:35 AM, Social Service X stated she was unaware she was responsible for notifying the resident or representative in writing when R14 went to the hospital because she had not received training regarding providing the written notice. Social Service X verified R14's transfer to the hospital was also not sent to the LTCO due to it did not come up on her report in the computer notification. Social Service X said the notice of the transfer should have been sent to the LTCO. 03/20/24 at 09:44 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) H stated social service staff was responsible for providing transfer information to R14 or her representative when R14 was transferred to the hospital. The facility's Emergency Transfer Notification Policy, revised 09/2018, documented that when a resident is transferred on an emergency basis the resident and representative would be notified verbally as soon as is practicable and would be notified of transfer in writing by the SSD as soon as is practicable. a copy of this notification would be kept on file and documentation that this notification was completed would be placed in the medical record. The policy documented the facility would notify the resident, representative, and state ombudsman of emergency transfers. The facility failed to provide R14 or her representative written notice regarding R14's facility-initiated transfer to the hospital and failed to notify the LTCO of the transfer. This placed the resident and/or her representative at risk of uninformed care choices.

The facility had a census of 25 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one reviewed for hospitalization . Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide Resident (R)14 or his representative with written information regarding the facility bed hold policy when R14 was transferred to the hospital. This placed R14 at risk of not being permitted to return and resume residence in the nursing facility. Findings included: - R14's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R14 had a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing). R14's Medicare Five Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented R14 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R14 required maximal to partial staff assistance with most activities of daily living (ADLs). R14's Care Plan, revised 12/21/23, documented R14 required continuous oxygen, and instructed staff to check R14's oxygen saturation every shift and as needed (PRN) and monitor for changes in R14's breathing patterns. The Progress Note, dated 02/05/2024 at 03:44 PM, documented R14 was admitted to the hospital. A review of R14's clinical record lacked evidence the resident or representative was provided the facility's bed hold policy when R14 went to the hospital. On 12/27/23 at 3:06 PM, observation revealed R14 sat in a recliner in her room with oxygen on per nasal cannula. 03/20/24 at 09:35 AM, Social Service X stated nursing was responsible for sending the bed hold policy and she was unaware the facility was supposed to have a signed copy from the resident or representative regarding they were notified. 03/20/24 at 09:44 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) H stated nursing was responsible for providing transfer information to R14 or her representative with the bed hold policy when R14 was transferred to the hospital. LN H stated she did not check to see if the signed bed hold policy came back to the facility. The facility's Bed Hold Policy, revised 11/2017, documented to ensure that residents are made aware of a facility's bed hold and reserve bed payment policy before and upon transfer to a hospital or when taking a therapeutic leave of absence from the facility. At the time of transfer, or in cases of emergency transfer, written notice must be provided to the resident and if applicable the resident's representative within 24 hours. Documentation of multiple attempts to reach the resident's representative would be retained in the medical record in cases where the facility was unable to notify the representative. The facility failed to provide R14 or his representatives with the bed hold policy when R14 was transferred to the hospital. This placed the resident at risk of not being permitted to return and resume residence in the nursing facility.

The facility had a census of 26 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to employ a full time certified dietary manager to plan and supervise the preparation of meals for the 26 residents who resided in the facility and received their meals from the facility kitchen. Findings included: - On 11/14/22 at 11:45 AM, observation revealed Dietary Staff (DS) BB in the kitchen preparing a pureed meal. On 11/14/22 at 11:50 AM, DS BB stated she was not certified as a dietary manager. DS BB stated she had been employed at the facility for several months as the dietary manager. On 11/15/22 at 10:10AM, Administrative Staff A verified the dietary manager was not a Certified Dietary Manager. The facility's Food Services Manager policy, dated 12/2008, documented the daily functions of the food services department are to be under the supervision of a qualified food services manager, licensed by the state and is knowledgeable and trained in food procurement, storage, handling, and preparation of food delivery. The facility failed to employ a full time Certified Dietary Manager for the 26 residents that resided in the facility and received meals from the facility kitchen, placing the residents at risk for inadequate nutrition.

The facility had a census of 26 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to wear hair coverings in one of one kitchens, placing the residents at risk for food borne illness. Findings included: - On 11/14/22 at 09:00 AM, observation of the facility's kitchen revealed a staff member standing in the kitchen by the steam table with no hair covering. On 11/14/22 at 12:15 PM, observation during food service revealed Dietary Staff (DS) BB with a hair net on, with her bangs and back of hair not covered by the hair net. On 11/14/22 at 12:30 PM, observation during food service revealed a staff member walked into the kitchen, poured a cup of coffee. Further observation revealed the staff member with no hair covering. On 11/14/22 at 12:35 PM, DS BB verified the staff are to wear hair covering when in the kitchen. On 11/15/22 at 10:10AM, Administrative Staff A verified the expectation was staff wear hair coverings when in the kitchen and food prep area. The facility's Dietary Employee Personal Hygiene policy, dated 07/18/2022, documented staff are to wear hair restraints, hairnet, hat and or beard restraints to prevent hair from contacting food. The facility failed to wear hair coverings for food safety for the 26 residents who received meals from the facility kitchen, placing the residents at risk for food borne illness.

The facility identified a census of 19 residents, one medication cart, one treatment cart, and one medication storage room. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to properly store and date one [MEDICATION(S)] (PPD- sterile solution of a purified protein derivative used in the diagnosis [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Findings included: - On [DATE] at 10:03 AM, the refrigerator in the medication storage room contained a [MEDICATION(S)] ([MEDICATION(S)] PPD) vial, opened and not dated. On [DATE] at 10:08 AM, the medication cart contained the following medicated eye drop bottles and medicated inhalers: One bottle of [MEDICATION(S)] eye drops (medication used to lower pressure in the eye by increasing the flow of natural eye fluids out of the eye) opened, no open date One bottle of [MEDICATION(S)] eye drops (medication used to treat high pressure inside the eye) opened, no open date One bottle of [MEDICATION(S)] eye drops (medication used to lower pressure in the eyes) opened, no open date Two [MEDICATION(S)] inhalers (medication used to control and prevent symptoms caused by asthma [disorder of narrowed airways that caused wheezing and shortness of breath] or ongoing lung disease) opened, no open date Two [MEDICATION(S)] inhalers (medication used to control and prevent symptoms caused by asthma) opened, no open date One [MEDICATION(S)] inhaler (medication used to treat and prevent symptoms caused by ongoing lung disease) opened, no open date A review of the facility's Expiration Dates/Drug Stability and Recordkeeping guide directed ophthalmic (eye) solution or suspensions expired six months after opening except [MEDICATION(S)] ([MEDICATION(S)]) eye drops which expired six weeks after opened. A review of the facility's Expiration Dates/Drug Stability and Recordkeeping guide directed [MEDICATION(S)] vials expired 30 days after opened. A review of the facility's Medications with Shortened Expiration Dates guide directed [MEDICATION(S)] inhalers were discarded six weeks or two months after opened depending on the medication strength, [MEDICATION(S)] inhalers were discarded three months after removed from foil package, [MEDICATION(S)] eye drops were discarded six weeks after opened, and [MEDICATION(S)] vials were discarded 30 days after opened. The guide directed the opened date was noted on each container/vial of medication known to have a shortened beyond use or expiration date. A review of the manufacturer's instructions for [MEDICATION(S)] inhaler directed [MEDICATION(S)] inhalers were discarded three months after assembly of inhaler. In an interview on [DATE] at 08:12 AM, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R stated there was a list that stated when different medications expired once opened and that every medication bottle, vial, and inhaler were dated when opened. She stated without an open date, staff did not know how long the medication had been opened. She stated if there was no open date, she threw the medication away and got a new bottle/inhaler out. In an interview on [DATE] at 09:09 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) H stated the bottle or box of medication was always dated when opened. She was unaware of a list for expiration dates of certain medications. In an interview on [DATE] at 02:00 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated she expected medication bottles/vials/inhalers to be dated when opened. She stated there was a cheat sheet that directed how long medications were good once opened. She stated [MEDICATION(S)] vials were dated and good for 30 days once opened. The facility's Storage of Medications policy, last revised [DATE], directed the facility shall not use discontinued or outdated drugs or biologicals. The policy lacked direction on dating opened medication bottles, vials, and inhalers. The facility failed to ensure proper storage and dating for identified [MEDICATION(S)] vial, medicated eye drops, and medicated inhaler. This deficient practice had the risk for unwarranted physical complications and ineffective treatment for [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER]

The facility identified a census of 19 residents. The sample included 11 residents, with five residents sampled for unnecessary medication use. Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported blood sugar levels outside of physician ordered parameters for one Resident (R)18 and physician ordered blood laboratory tests lacking for R18, R5, R8, and R6. Findings included: - R18's electronic medical record (EMR) for from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of hypertension (elevated blood pressure) and diabetes mellitus (DM- when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R18 required supervision of one staff member for Activities of Daily Living (ADL's). The MDS documented R18 received insulin injections (medication to regulate blood sugar), antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat [CONDITION(S)] (any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing) and other mental emotional conditions) medication, antidepressant (- class of medications used to treat mood disorders and relieve symptoms of depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness and emptiness) medication, hypnotic (a class of medications used to induce sleep and treat insomnia) medication, opiod (a class of medication used to treat pain) medication, and anticoagulant (class of medications used to prevent the formation of blood clots) medication for seven days during the look back period. R18's [CONDITION(S)] Drug Use Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 05/27/21 documented nursing monitored for effectiveness and side effects of medication administered to R18. R18's Care Plan with revision date 04/05/18 documented for the nurse to check her blood sugar as ordered and to notify the physician if less (<) than 60 or greater (>) than 300. R18's Care Plan with revision date 03/04/21 documented she had blood drawn for routine labs every three months for hemoglobinA1c (HgbA1c-blood test that reflects blood glucose levels over the past three months), because of the medications ordered. Review of the EMR under Orders tab revealed: HgbA1c every three months dated 02/29/20. Notify physician if blood sugar <60 or >300. [MEDICATION(S)] solution (insulin) [MEDICATION(S)] (human) inject as per sliding scale: 140-180 = eight units (u); 181-220 = 12u; 221-260 = 14u; 261-300 = 18u; 301-350 =20u; 351-400 =22u; 401-500 = 24u, subcutaneously two June 2020times a day for DM. Notify the physician if blood sugar <60 or >300 dated 08/24/18. Review of EMR under the Misc. tab lacked a blood laboratory test for December 2020 for R18's Hgb A1c as ordered. Review of the EMR under Wts/Vitals tab documented blood sugars outside physician ordered parameters from June 2020 to June 8th, 2021: 06/08/20-307; 06/11/20-326; 06/13/20-356; 06/18/20-355; 07/27/20-306; 10/10/20-307; 10/31/20-330; 11/09/20-323; 11/12/20-314; 01/29/21-411; 02/26/21-398; 02/27/21-345; 05/07/21-329; 05/22/21-330; and 05/29/21-309. The clinical record lacked documentation that the physician was notified of blood sugars outside parameters. The Medication Regiment Review performed by the CP, reviewed June 2020 through May 2021 did not address the lack of routine lab ordered by the physician in December 2020 and lack of physician notification of outside the parameter blood sugars as ordered by the physician. Observation on 06/08/21 at 08:20 AM R18 laid in bed with her eyes closed, blankets pulled to her chest area, lights off in her room. No distress or behaviors noted. On 06/08/21 at 11:28 AM during an interview with Licensed Nurse (LN) G stated that R18 had physician ordered blood sugar parameters on the Medication Administration Record (MAR). LN G stated that notification of the physician of out of parameter blood sugars was documented under the progress notes in the EMR. On 06/08/21 at 05:12 PM during an interview with Administrative Nurse D stated that the routine lab work that was ordered for R18 in December 2020 was not obtained but was obtained in February 2021. On 06/09/21 at 09:40 AM during interview with Licensed Nurse (LN) H stated that the laboratory staff came every Thursday to draw blood. That every Wednesday the day shift charge nurse faxed the list of resident's and what blood tests ordered. On 06/09/21 at 01:32 PM during an interview with Administrative Nurse D stated that blood sugar parameters are on the MAR that the nursing follow and chart in the progress notes when a physician is notified. On 06/10/21 at 12:15 PM, CP GG was unavailable for interview. The facility's Drug Regimen Review policy, dated November 2016, directed the CP performed a drug regimen review on each resident at least monthly and the facility provided laboratory results to the CP for review. The policy directed the CP reviewed the following of physician-ordered notification/holding parameters for drugs as appropriate. The facility failed to ensure the CP GG recognized and reported missing documentation of physician notification for blood sugars outside parameters and missing lab work as ordered for R18. This had the potential harm for unwanted side effects of unnecessary medications. - The Diagnoses tab in R5's electronic medical record (EMR) documented diagnoses of [CONDITION(S)] disorder (major mental illness that caused people to have episodes of severe high and low moods), [CONDITION(S)] (condition characterized by decreased activity of the [CONDITION(S)] gland), diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin) and hypertension (elevated blood pressure). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated intact cognition. She required extensive assistance of one to two staff with most activities of daily living (ADLs). She received seven days of antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat [CONDITION(S)] and other mental emotional conditions), antidepressant (class of medications used to treat mood disorders and relieve symptoms of depression) and antianxiety (class of medications that calm and relax people with excessive anxiety, nervousness, or tension) medications. The ADL Care Area Assessment date 05/06/21 documented R5 needed increased assistance with her ADL's. The [CONDITION(S)] Drug Use Care Area assessment dated [DATE] documented R5 received several scheduled [CONDITION(S)] (effects the chemical makeup of the brain and nervous system) medications and the physician and consultant pharmacist reviewed the medications at routine intervals for possible gradual dose reduction and/or continued need for the medications. The Comprehensive Care Plan revised on 04/07/21 documented labs to be drawn routinely related to medications R5 had received. R5's EMR documented an order for: [CONDITION(S)] Stimulating Hormone (TSH) and Lipids to be drawn every six months dated 03/03/20 [MEDICATION(S)] level to be drawn every three months dated 03/02/20 R5's EMR reviewed 03/3/20 through 06/09/21 revealed the lipid lab was drawn on 04/21/20 and 02/25/21. The EMR lacked documentation of the lipid lab being completed in October 2020 R5's EMR reviewed 03/02/21 through 06/09/21 revealed the [MEDICATION(S)] level was drawn on 03/05/20 and 02/25/21. The EMR lacked documentation of the [MEDICATION(S)] level being completed on June 2020, September 2020 and December 2020. The Medication Regiment Review by the consultant pharmacist from May 2020 through May 2021 lacked a recommendation to obtain the blood laboratory testing. An observation on 06/09/21 at 07:20 AM resident propelled self to the dining room. R5 had no complaints of pain or discomfort. In an interview on 06/09/21 at 09:40 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) H stated the director of nursing (DON) reviewed the lab orders that needed to be completed and provided a list to the floor nurses of which labs needed to be drawn for each week. LN stated the list is then faxed to the hospital on Wednesdays for the draw to be completed at the facility on Thursday by the hospital lab technician. In an interview on 06/09/21 at 12:40 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated that the facility missed collecting three [MEDICATION(S)] draws for R5. In an interview on 06/09/21 at 01:30 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated she completed a performance improvement plan (PIP) in February 2021. Administrative Nurse D stated she reviewed the outstanding lab orders and sorted them by month. She further stated immediate order labs are collected by the facility nurses and taken to the hospital and routine order labs are completed on Thursday by the hospital technician. On 06/10/21 at 12:51 PM Consultant Pharmacist (CP) GG was unavailable for interview. The facility's undated Physician Orders for Medications and Treatments policy, lacks documentation regarding laboratory testing. The facility's Drug Regimen Review dated 11/2016 outlines that the facility is to provide the CP with laboratory results for the management of medication regimen. The facility failed to ensure that the CP identified unobtained lab orders by the physician were followed for the lipid and [MEDICATION(S)] lab draws. This had the potential for unwarranted side effects of unnecessary medication administration. - The Medical Diagnoses tab of R8's electronic medical record (EMR) documented a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin was made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 which, indicated intact cognition. R8 required supervision with her Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). She did not receive insulin (medication used to treat diabetes) during the look back period. The Annual MDS dated [DATE] documented a BIMS score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. She was independent with her ADLs. She did not receive insulin during the look back period. The ADL Functional/Rehabilitation Potential Care Area assessment dated [DATE] documented R8 was receiving Physical, Occupational, and Speech Therapies due to a recent diagnosis of Covid-19 (an infectious disease caused by a severe acute respiratory syndrome which caused an ongoing world-wide pandemic). The Comprehensive Care Plan documented R8 was at risk for drug to drug interactions related to some of her medications. R8 received routine blood laboratory work related to medications she received. The Physician's Order tab documented an order for a Hemoglobin A1C (HGB A1C-blood test which shows the average blood sugar levels over the previous two or three months) obtain every six months dated 02/10/21. There were no orders for medications used to treat diabetes. Review of R8's EMR lacked documentation for HgbA1C levels obtained. Review of the Consultant Pharmacist's monthly Medication Regiment Reviews from February 2021 through May 2021 revealed a lack of documentation regarding the HgbA1C blood testing. On 06/08/21 at 04:35 PM R8 sat in her room, as she colored a picture. She was alert and cheerful and stated she enjoyed the activity. On 06/08/21 at 05:12 PM Administrative Nurse D stated an order for a HgbA1c was received on 02/10/21 the facility staff transcribed the order on 02/10/21 but, the order was sent to the laboratory for an August 2021 testing date. On 06/09/21 at 01:32 PM Administrative Nurse D stated an audit of residents' EMRs in February identified there were blood laboratory tests ordered which, had not been obtained. Administrative Nurse D assumed the missing tests were due to Covid-19 outbreaks the facility had undergone. On 06/10/21 at 12:51 PM the Consultant Pharmacist was unavailable for comment. The facility's Drug Regimen Review policy dated November 2016 documented the Consultant Pharmacist performed a medication regimen review at least monthly and the facility provided residents' laboratory results to the Consultant Pharmacist. The facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist identified and reported the facility's failure to provide physician ordered HgbA1C was obtained. This had the potential for inadequate treatment needed to treat R8's diabetes. - The Medical Diagnoses tab of R6's electronic medical record (EMR) documented diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF- a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid) and Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 which, indicated moderately impaired cognition. She required supervision to extensive assistance with her Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). She had CHF and Alzheimer's disease. The Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] documented a BIMS score of nine, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. She required supervision to extensive assistance with her ADLs. The Nutritional Status Care Area assessment dated [DATE] documented the facility staff monitored R6's weights since she had a history of weight gain from fluid retention due to her CHF. The Comprehensive Care Plan documented R6 had CHF and received [MEDICATION(S)] (medication used to treat CHF) daily. The staff monitored her for signs of fluid retention. R6 had routine blood laboratory tests to monitor for medications she was administered. The staff notified the physician if there were abnormal results, so medication orders were changed if needed. The Physician's Order tab documented orders for a Complete Blood Count (CBC-a blood test used to evaluate the cells that circulate in the body, which can evaluate a person's overall health), a Comprehensive Metabolic Profile (CMP-blood test which measures fluid balance, kidney function, and liver function), and Lipase level (blood test used to help monitor possible diseases of the pancreas) obtain every three months for biliary stricture (a narrowing of the bile duct) dated 03/02/20 and discontinued 06/09/21. A physician's verbal order was written on 06/09/21 for the same tests to be done every three months for biliary stricture. Review of R6's EMR revealed a lack of documentation for lipase levels drawn in June, September, or December 2020. There were no CBC or CMP levels for December 2020. Review of the Consultant Pharmacist's monthly Medication Regiment Reviews from June 2020 through May 2021 lacked documentation for the laboratory testing. On 06/08/21 at 01:17 PM R6 ambulated from her room to the common area to watch television. She used a walker and had a slow shuffling gait. On 06/09/21 at 01:32 PM Administrative Nurse D stated an audit of residents' EMRs in February identified there were blood laboratory tests ordered which, had not been obtained. Administrative Nurse D assumed the missing tests were due to Covid-19 outbreaks the facility had undergone. On 06/10/21 at 12:51 PM the Consultant Pharmacist was unavailable for comment. The facility's Drug Regimen Review policy dated November 2016 documented the Consultant Pharmacist performed a medication regimen review at least monthly and the facility provided residents' laboratory results to the Consultant Pharmacist. The facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist identified and reported the facility's failure to provide physician ordered blood laboratory tests. This had the potential for inadequate treatments of the biliary stricture and unwarranted side effects. The facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist identified and reported the facility's failure to ensure physician ordered blood tests were obtained. This had the potential for inadequate treatments of the biliary stricture and unwarranted side effects.

The facility identified a census of 19 residents. The sample included 11 residents, with five residents sampled for unnecessary medication use. Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews. The facility failed to identify blood sugar levels outside of physician ordered parameters for one Resident (R)18 and failed to ensure physician ordered blood laboratory tests were obtained for R18, R5, R8, and R6. Findings included: - R18's electronic medical record (EMR) for from the diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R18 required supervision of one staff member for Activities of Daily Living (ADL's). The MDS documented R18 received insulin injections (medication to regulate blood sugar), antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat [CONDITION(S)] (any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing) and other mental emotional conditions) medication, antidepressant (- class of medications used to treat mood disorders and relieve symptoms of depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness and emptiness) medication, hypnotic (a class of medications used to induce sleep and treat insomnia) medication, opiod (a class of medication used to treat pain) medication, and anticoagulant (class of medications used to prevent the formation of blood clots) medication for seven days during the look back period. R18's [CONDITION(S)] Drug Use Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 05/27/21 documented nursing monitored for effectiveness and side effects of medication administered to R18. R18's Care Plan with revision date 04/05/18 documented for the nurse to check her blood sugar as ordered and to notify the physician if less (<) than 60 or greater (>) than 300. R18's Care Plan with revision date 03/04/21 documented she had blood drawn for routine labs every three months for hemoglobinA1c (HgbA1c-blood test that reflects blood glucose levels over the past three months), because of the medications ordered. Review of the EMR under Orders tab revealed: HgbA1c every three months dated 02/29/20. Notify physician if blood sugar <60 or >300. [MEDICATION(S)] solution (insulin) [MEDICATION(S)] (human) inject as per sliding scale: 140-180 = eight units (u); 181-220 = 12u; 221-260 = 14u; 261-300 = 18u; 301-350 =20u; 351-400 =22u; 401-500 = 24u, subcutaneously two June 2020times a day for DM. Notify the physician if blood sugar <60 or >300 dated 08/24/18. Review of EMR under the Misc. tab lacked a blood laboratory test for December 2020 for R18's Hgb A1c as ordered. Review of the EMR under Wts/Vitals tab documented blood sugars outside physician ordered parameters from June 2020 to June 8th, 2021: 06/08/20-307; 06/11/20-326; 06/13/20-356; 06/18/20-355; 07/27/20-306; 10/10/20-307; 10/31/20-330; 11/09/20-323; 11/12/20-314; 01/29/21-411; 02/26/21-398; 02/27/21-345; 05/07/21-329; 05/22/21-330; and 05/29/21-309. The clinical record lacked documentation that the physician was notified of blood sugars outside parameters. Observation on 06/08/21 at 08:20 AM R18 laid in bed with her eyes closed, blankets pulled to her chest area, lights off in her room. No distress or behaviors noted. On 06/08/21 at 11:28 AM during an interview with Licensed Nurse (LN) G stated that R18 had physician ordered blood sugar parameters on the Medication Administration Record [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . On 06/08/21 at 05:12 PM during an interview with Administrative Nurse D stated that the routine lab work that was ordered for R18 in December 2020 was not obtained but was obtained in February 2021. On 06/09/21 at 09:40 AM during interview with Licensed Nurse (LN) H stated that the laboratory staff came every Thursday to draw blood. That every Wednesday the day shift charge nurse faxed the list of resident's and what blood tests ordered. On 06/09/21 at 01:32 PM during an interview with Administrative Nurse D stated that blood sugar parameters are on the MAR indicated [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . The facility's Physician order [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . The facility failed to ensure that physician ordered blood laboratory tests were obtained and the physician was not notified of outside ordered blood sugars parameters, which had the potential for unnecessary medication use and unwarranted side effects for R18. -The diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated intact cognition. She required extensive assistance of one to two staff with most activities of daily living (ADLs). The ADL Care Area Assessment date 05/06/21 documented R5 needed increased assistance with her ADL's. The Comprehensive Care Plan revised on 04/07/21 documented labs to be drawn routinely related to medications R5 had received. R5's EMR documented orders for: [CONDITION(S)] Stimulating Hormone (TSH) and Lipids to be drawn every six months dated 03/03/20 R5's EMR reviewed 03/3/20 through 06/09/21 revealed the lipid lab was drawn on 04/21/20 and 02/25/21. The EMR lacked documentation of the lipid lab being completed in October 2020 An observation on 06/09/21 at 07:20 AM resident propelled self to the dining room. R5 had no complaints of pain or In an interview on 06/09/21 at 09:40 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) H stated the director of nursing (DON) reviewed the lab orders that needed to be completed and provided a list to the floor nurses of which labs needed to be drawn for each week. LN stated the list is then faxed to the hospital on Wednesdays for the draw to be completed at the facility on Thursday by the hospital lab technician. In an interview on 06/09/21 at 12:40 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated that the facility missed collecting one lipid draw and three [MEDICATION(S)] draws for R5. In an interview on 06/09/21 at 01:30 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated she completed a performance improvement plan (PIP) in February 2021 Administrative Nurse D stated she reviewed the outstanding lab orders and sorted them by month. She further stated immediate order labs are collected by the facility nurses and taken to the hospital and routine order labs are completed on Thursday by the hospital technician. The facility's undated Physician order [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . The facility failed to ensure that the physician orders [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . This had the potential for unwarranted side effects of unnecessary medication administration. - The Medical diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 which, indicated intact cognition. R8 required supervision with her Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). She did not receive insulin (medication used to treat diabetes) during the look back period. The Annual MDS dated [DATE] documented a BIMS score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. She was independent with her ADLs. She did not receive insulin during the look back period. The ADL Functional/Rehabilitation Potential Care Area assessment dated [DATE] documented R8 was receiving Physical, Occupational, and Speech Therapies due to a recent diagnosis [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . The Comprehensive Care Plan documented R8 was at risk for drug to drug interactions related to some of her medications. R8 received routine blood laboratory work related to medications she received. The physician's orders [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . There were no orders for medications used to treat diabetes. Review of R8's EMR lacked documentation for HgbA1C levels obtained. On 06/08/21 at 04:35 PM R8 sat in her room, as she colored a picture. She was alert and cheerful and stated she enjoyed the activity. On 06/08/21 at 05:12 PM Administrative Nurse D stated an order for [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . On 06/09/21 at 01:32 PM Administrative Nurse D stated an audit of residents' EMRs in February identified there were blood laboratory tests ordered which, had not been obtained. Administrative Nurse D assumed the missing tests were due to Covid-19 outbreaks the facility had undergone. The facility's undated Physician order [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . The facility failed to ensure the physician ordered HgbA1C was obtained. This had the potential for inadequate treatment needed to treat R8's diabetes. - The Medical diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 which, indicated moderately impaired cognition. She required supervision to extensive assistance with her Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). She had CHF and Alzheimer's disease. The Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] documented a BIMS score of nine, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. She required supervision to extensive assistance with her ADLs. The Nutritional Status Care Area assessment dated [DATE] documented the facility staff monitored R6's weights since she had a history of [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . The Comprehensive Care Plan documented R6 had CHF and received [MEDICATION(S)] (medication used to treat CHF) daily. The staff monitored her for signs of fluid retention. R6 had routine blood laboratory tests to monitor for medications she was administered. The staff notified the physician if there were abnormal results, so medication orders were changed if needed. The physician's orders [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . A physician's verbal order was written on 06/09/21 for the same tests to be done every three months for biliary stricture. Review of R6's EMR revealed a lack of documentation for lipase levels drawn in June, September, or December 2020. There were no CBC or CMP levels for December 2020. On 06/08/21 at 01:17 PM R6 ambulated from her room to the common area to watch television. She used a walker and had a slow shuffling gait. On 06/09/21 at 01:32 PM Administrative Nurse D stated an audit of residents' EMRs in February identified there were blood laboratory tests ordered which, had not been obtained. Administrative Nurse D assumed the missing tests were due to Covid-19 outbreaks the facility had undergone. The facility's undated Physician order [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . The facility failed to ensure physician ordered blood laboratory tests were obtained. This had the potential for inadequate treatments of the biliary stricture and unwarranted side effects.

The facility identified a census of 19 residents. The sample included 11 residents with one resident sampled for communication review. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to facilitate effective communication between Resident (R) 10 and facility staff. This placed R10 at risk for unmet needs/wants and impaired psychosocial well-being. Findings included: - The diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R10 had moderate cognitive impairment per Staff Assessment for Mental Status. R10 had adequate hearing and clear speech; sometimes made self understood, sometimes understood others, and responded to simple, direct communication only. R10 had moderately impaired vision. R10 required extensive physical assistance with two staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, and toileting; extensive physical assistance with one staff for eating, locomotion, and personal hygiene. The Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] documented R10 had severe cognitive impairment per Staff Assessment for Mental Status. R10 had minimal hearing difficulty and unclear speech; rarely made self understood and rarely understood others. R10 had impaired vision and good read large print. R10 required extensive physical assistance with two staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, locomotion, toileting, and personal hygiene; extensive physical assist with one staff for eating. The Cognitive Loss/Dementia Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 12/2/20 documented R10 spoke German but was usually able to get her needs across to staff using her eyes and gestures. The Communication CAA dated 12/2/20 documented R10 appeared to have understood what staff was saying to her in English, other times she went along with what staff helped her with. Therapy tried communication picture books with little success. The Mood State CAA dated 12/2/20 documented R10 required total assistance with all activities of daily living (ADLs) and usually accepted staff assistance without any issues. R10 occasionally did not understand what staff tried to do or got frustrated and yelled at staff. When that happened due to communication difficulties, staff made sure she was safe and let her calm down. The Care Plan dated 01/02/20, revised 06/18/20, documented R10 did not always speak English and her dementia reverted her back to her primary language of German. An intervention initiated 06/18/20 directed R10 had a book that Speech Therapy made for her to use for cuing and directed that staff pointed at a picture or phrase to help R10 understand what they wanted to do, it did not always work though. An intervention initiated 06/18/20 directed staff to talk to R10 while they helped her as she might understand what staff wanted and to use simple sentences, words, or gestures as those were easier for R10 to understand. In an observation on 06/07/21 at 10:20 AM, R10 sat in her wheelchair in her room. R10 did not communicate with surveyor, no communication board was observed readily available in room. In an observation on 06/07/21 at 12:07 PM, R10 sat in her wheelchair at dining room table, staff assisted her with lunch without talking to her or attempting to engage her in conversation. In an observation on 06/08/21 at 03:37 PM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M and CNA N explained to R10 in simple sentences that they were going to transfer R10 from her recliner into her wheelchair. R10 mumbled an incoherent verbal response and was unable to follow staff's verbal commands during the transfer. CNA M and CNA N assisted R10 onto the sit-to-stand lift (device designed to help residents who lack the strength or muscle control to rise to a standing position and quickly transferring) and physically placed her hands/legs onto the sit-to-stand lift appropriately. In an observation on 06/09/21 at 07:20 AM, R10 sat in her wheelchair at dining room table, staff assisted her with breakfast without talking to her. In an interview on 06/07/21 at 10:20 AM, Dietary Manager BB stated R10 did not talk or respond and if she did it was in German. In an interview on 06/08/21 at 03:37 PM, CNA M stated there was no communication board to use. CNA M stated staff just knew how to provide care for R10. In an interview on 06/09/21 at 09:25 AM, CNA M stated staff monitored R10's noises and body language to anticipate her needs. CNA M was not aware of a communication board, but she had cues on the wall for greetings in German. In an interview on 06/09/21 at 09:40 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G stated she was not sure if R10 had a communication board, but staff did not use it. LN G stated R10 did not respond to staff but when she did it was in German which staff did not understand. She stated staff used hand motions and gestures to communicate care with R10. In an interview on 06/09/21 at 01:35 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated R10's family provided pages of pictures for communication but was not aware of a communication book. The facility's Communication with Elders policy, dated 11/30/17, directed if a resident's primary language was other than English, staff provided interpreting and translations services as necessary. The policy directed staff communicated with a resident with dementia by speaking in a normal tone of voice and greeting them as staff would anyone else and repeated key words if the resident did not understand the first time around. The facility failed to facilitate effective communication between R10 and facility staff. This deficient practice had the risk for unwarranted physical, emotional, and mental complications related to miscommunication of care and needs for R10.

The facility reported a census of 23 residents. The sample included 11 residents. Based on record review and interview of a closed record the facility failed to initiate cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) on 1(#32) resident in the sample who was a full code. This placed the resident in immediate jeopardy and the resident died . Findings included: - The admission Minimum Data Set ((MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 (cognitively intact). The 30-day MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 14 (cognitively intact). The advanced directives temporary care plan dated [DATE] revealed the resident was a full code and wanted her/his wishes followed. The advance directives care plan dated [DATE] revealed the resident wanted CPR performed and was aware of risks associated with CPR. A Full Code Resuscitation Directive form dated [DATE] revealed the resident signed the form indicating a desire for CPR, and signed by the physician on [DATE]. Record review [DATE] at 12:06 PM of hard chart revealed a Full Code Resuscitation Directive signed by resident [DATE] and had been signed by the physician dated [DATE]. Nursing Notes dated [DATE] at 9:35 P.M revealed at 9:15 P.M., staff observed the resident was not breathing, lacked a pulse nor heard a heartbeat. The resident ' s pupils were fixed and resident was nonresponsive to verbal or tactile stimuli. Staff notified the physician of the death, obtained an order to release the body to the mortuary, and notified the family, the director of nurses (DON), the administrator, and funeral home. Personnel record reviewed [DATE] at 8:30 A.M. revealed licensed nursing staff I had a valid CPR card expiring ,[DATE]. On [DATE] at 3:45 P.M. direct care staff P stated she/he last observed the resident, lying in bed sleeping, after supper. She/he was not sure what time she/he and the nurse found the resident not breathing and the nurse assessed the resident to see if the resident ' s pulse and respirations had stopped. Direct care staff P stated she/he was not sure what the residents code status was and the system in place was color coded name plates outside resident doors indicating a resident code status; white indicated full code and blue indicated do not resuscitate. On [DATE] at 5:01 P.M. direct care staff Q stated direct care staff and licensed nursing staff I found the resident unresponsive at around 9:00 P.M. to 9:30 P.M. She/he last observed the resident in bed when the resident refused to eat the evening meal at around 5:00 P.M. Staff did not initiate CPR and resident ' s code status was a full code and did not know why CPR was not initiated. A resident ' s name plaque outside the door identified a resident ' s code status, white indicated a full code and blue indicated do not resuscitate. A list of resident code status hangs on the wall of the main shower rooms. On [DATE] at 5:30 P.M. administrative staff A stated an investigation was not initiated and witness statements were not obtained. On [DATE] at 6:20 P.M. licensed nursing staff I stated she/he was not sure as to the time resident passed. She/he and direct care staff P noted the resident was not breathing during a resident visual check. She/he did not observe mottling, no active rise or fall of the resident ' s chest, and did not respond to sternal rub nor respond to her/his name. Licensed nurse I stated she/he checked a radial pulse and used a stethoscope to listen for heart and lung sounds. The carotid pulse was check and her/his eyes were fixed and not blinking. The resident did not have vital signs, skin was cool to touch which was normal for this resident. She/he did not move the resident ' s extremities and did not know if the resident experienced body stiffness. Licensed nursing staff I stated she/he did not initiate CPR as she/he did not know how long it was the resident had passed or how long been since she/he last performed a visual check on the resident as the resident resided on the east hall and she/he was passing medications on the west hall. The facility policy was for staff to initiate CPR if a resident experienced [MEDICAL CONDITION] or had an absence of pulse and/or respirations. On [DATE] at 1:00 P.M. administrative nursing staff D stated staff should have initiated CPR on a resident identified as a full code and another staff activated 911 and CPR to continue until the ambulance arrived. On [DATE] at 10:19 A.M. administrative staff A stated the facility does perform investigations if a resident dies and nursing notes were reviewed. She/he stated the resident ' s nursing notes were reviewed and did not catch the fact the resident was a full code. The revised policy and procedure dated ,[DATE] titled CPR Certified Staff revealed the facility will ensure that designated direct care staff will maintain CPR certification and initiate CPR when [MEDICAL CONDITION] occurs for residents that have requested CPR in their advance directives. Prior to the arrival of the EMS, the facility will provide basic life support, including initiation of CPR, to a resident who experiences [MEDICAL CONDITION] in accordance with that resident ' s advanced directives or in the absence of advanced directives or DNR order. The facility failed to initiate CPR on a resident with a full code status. This placed the resident in immediate jeopardy and the resident died . The facility abated the immediate jeopardy on [DATE] at 5:05 P.M. when 100% of the facility staff was re-educated regarding the facility ' s policy and procedure to provide CPR when a do not resuscitate was not in place. The deficient practice remains at a scope and severity of an G.

The facility reported a census of 23 residents. The sample included 11 residents. Based on record review and interview of a closed record, the facility failed to notify the physician of a change in resident status for 1 (#32) resident in the sample. Findings included: - The admission Minimum Data Set ((MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 (cognitively intact). The resident required extensive assistance of two plus (2+) persons for bed mobility, transfer, walking in her/his room, and toilet use, required extensive assistance of one person for locomotion on/off the unit, dressing, and personal hygiene, and independent with set up assist with eating. The Care Area assessment dated [DATE] for activities of daily living (ADL) revealed the resident was hospitalized for [REDACTED]. The resident received [MEDICAL TREATMENT] three days a week and intravenous antibiotics after [MEDICAL TREATMENT]. The resident required assistance with transfers, at times, mobility, dressing, toileting, bathing, personal hygiene, and fed her/himself. The resident utilized a wheelchair and resident self propelled the wheelchair. The resident planned to go home when stronger, and staff encouraged the resident to participate with therapies and cares. The ADL care plan dated [DATE] revealed the resident performed his/her own A.M. or P.M. cares, required assistance of ,[DATE] staff for transfers to the toilet or bedside commode, especially on [MEDICAL TREATMENT] days, and assistance with dressing. The communication/memory care plan dated [DATE] revealed the resident could make his/her wants and needs known verbally, and did not have much trouble with her/his memory. The daily skilled nursing notes dated [DATE] at 11:45 P.M. revealed the resident was alert, fed self, able to make own food choices, and spent most of her/his time outside smoking. The nursing notes dated [DATE] at 12:48 A.M. revealed the resident refused to eat a protein snack of a peanut butter sandwich The skilled nursing notes dated [DATE] at 4:41 P.M. revealed the resident was somewhat lethargic, able to rouse and answer questions appropriately but slowly and falls back asleep easily. The resident refused breakfast and required cueing and assistance with lunch, falls asleep easily at meals. Staff will monitor resident ' s lethargy. The nursing notes dated [DATE] at 2:42 P.M. revealed staff notified the on call doctor about the resident ' s wounds. The daily skilled nursing notes dated [DATE] at 12:34 A.M. revealed the resident was alert and oriented to person, place, and time, speech clear and followed commands, did not eat evening meal and remained in bed. The daily skilled nursing notes dated [DATE] at 1:37 P.M. revealed the resident was more alert today, aware of surroundings, refused breakfast and lunch. The daily skilled nursing notes dated [DATE] at 10:59 P.M. revealed the resident was aware of her/his surrounds with increased confusion and lethargy. The resident required total assistance with evening meal. The daily skilled nursing notes dated [DATE] at 12:16 P.M. revealed the resident was aware of her/his surroundings with increased confusion and lethargy and required total assistance as the resident was unable to feed her/himself. The Physician's Progress Notes dated [DATE] at 7:06 A.M. revealed the resident stated she/he was going home, had multiple bilateral wounds to the feet, required assistance with ADL ' s and high risk for systemic infection. On [DATE] at 6:20 P.M. licensed nursing staff I stated the resident was not well for three days; she/he required feeding for meals, had been lethargic for the last three days, was not going out to smoke as she/he normally would, and was not sure if the day nurse notified the physician of a change in condition. On [DATE] at 5:00 P.M. licensed nursing staff H stated the resident was lethargic, confused, and slept more and did not go out for her/his usual cigarette break. A physician came daily to the facility and would see resident ' s that staff deemed she/he should see. The facility would expect staff to notify a doctor if a resident experienced and increase in confusion and increase in lethargy and the resident was on the doctor ' s list to be seen the next day. Facility failed to provide documentation that the physician had not been notified of the Resident's change in condition. On [DATE] at 8:40 A.M. administrative nursing staff A stated she/he would expect nursing staff to notify the primary provider if staff noticed a consistence change in cognition and status. The revised policy and procedure dated [DATE] titled Primary Care Provider Notification of Change revealed the licensed nurse would notify a resident ' s physician or designated physician of a change in status and record in the resident ' s clinical record. The facility failed to notify the physician of this resident increased lethargy and confusion and died .

The facility had a census of 29 residents. The sample included 19 residents. Based upon observation, record review and interviews the facility failed to implement timely interventions for 1 (#20) of 1 residents sampled for weight loss. Findings included: - Review of resident #20's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 dated 11/30/12 identified the resident had short and long term memory problems and moderately impaired cognition. The MDS included the resident was totally dependent on staff with bed mobility, transfers, locomotion on/off the unit, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene and required limited staff assistance with eating. The MDS identified the resident held food in his/her mouth/cheek or residual food in his/her mouth after meals, and coughed or choked during meals or when he/she swallowed medications. The MDS recorded the resident weighed 223 pounds, had experienced a weight loss of 5 percent (%) in 1 month or 10% in 6 months, was not on a physician regimen weight loss program and received a mechanical altered diet. The MDS identified the resident had (1) unstageable pressure ulcer due to slough/eschar that measured 2.3 centimeters (cm) by 3.8 cm, (1) venous/arterial ulcer and moisture associated skin damage. The resident's nutritional status care area assessment (CAA) dated 12/9/12 included the resident had a [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. The CAA included the resident had experienced a weight loss, and the facility had attempted several things to encourage the resident to eat, such as supplements, ice cream, pureed diet and assistance during meals. The CAA documented the resident had unstageable ulcer on his/her heel and an arterial ulcer on his/her toe. The CAA included the facility would care plan for staff to encourage the resident to eat. The resident's care plan dated 9/19/12 included an entry dated 10/22/12 that revealed the resident had lost some weight over a months time, the resident was okay with that and the resident could stand to lose some weight. An handwritten entry dated 11/28/12 included the resident received a pureed diet with nectar thickened liquids and an entry dated 12/12/12 included the resident now received Hospice services for end of life care due to a long standing history of myeloproiferative disorder syndrome (a form of bone marrow disorder that interferes with red blood cell production), [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. A registered dietician note dated 11/19/12 included the resident had (2) skin issues (right heel and right great toe), a significant weight loss in the past month and started receiving 30 cubic centimeters (cc's) of Prosource (a supplement to increase protein and not calories for weight gain) on 11/16/12. A dietician's note dated 12/17/12 included the resident had a [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. The record lacked evidence any new interventions were added to address the continuous weight loss. Review of the resident's Medication Administration Record [MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION RECORD DETAILS REDACTED]. Further review revealed the facility did not record the percentage of the supplement the resident drank. A nurse's note dated 12/17/12 and timed 3:00 P.M. included the facility received a telephone order to discontinue the 30 cc's of Prosource twice a day. (The only supplement the resident received.). Review of the resident's monthly weight report revealed the following weights: 09/2012: 253 pounds 10/2012: 249 pounds 11/2012: 245 pounds 12/2012: 225 pounds (weight loss of 20 pounds in 1 month (8.16%) and weight loss of 28 pounds (11.06%) in 3 months). On 12/18/12 at 4:45 P.M. staff assisted the resident with the supper meal which consisted of vegetable soup, applesauce, ice cream, egg salad, milk and juice. At 5:00 P.M. the resident had consumed 75% of the applesauce and none of the vegetable soup or egg salad. During interview with direct care staff Q at that time, staff stated the resident did not want to eat the other solid foods and the resident seemed to like to eat cold foods/liquids versus hot foods/liquids. At 5:30 P.M. the resident had finished the meal and had consumed 100% of the applesauce and ice cream and 75% of the liquids. The staff did not offer a substitute for the soup( and egg salad the resident did not eat. Observation on 12/19/12 at approximately 8:30 A.M. revealed the resident had an unstageable pressure ulcer on his/her right heel that measured approximately 2 cm by 2 cm. On 12/19/12 the resident stayed in bed until approximate 9:10 A.M. At 9:20 A.M. direct care staff R wheeled the resident to the dining room. During interview with direct care staff R at that time staff stated the resident had not eaten breakfast which is why he/she wheeled the resident to the dining room. Observation revealed the resident attended the group exercises in the dining room from 9:30 A.M. until 9:55 A.M. The resident attended an activity in the activity room from approximately 10:00 A.M. until approximately 11:00 A.M. Staff took the resident to the dining room at 12:05 P.M. for the lunch meal. Staff served the resident oatmeal, cranberry juice and milk. During interview with dietary staff DD at that time, staff stated when staff asked the resident if he/she wanted the main entree, the resident did not respond, staff then asked the resident if he/she wanted oatmeal and the resident said yes which is why the resident received the oatmeal. At 12:30 P.M. the resident had finished eating the lunch meal and had consumed 100% of the oatmeal and 75% of the fluids. Further observation revealed the lunch menu included tenderized steak, mashed potatoes and gravy, green beans and lemon cake. Staff did not offer the resident any additional items. Review of the resident's meal intake sheet on 12/19/12 at approximately 12:50 P.M. revealed staff had not documented the resident's breakfast meal intake for 12/19/12. During interview with dietary staff DD at that time he/she stated nursing staff asked the resident (prior to getting the resident out of bed that A.M.) if he/she was going to eat breakfast, the resident responded no therefore dietary staff did not offer the resident a breakfast tray. Dietary staff DD stated snacks were available to residents 24 hours in the snack baskets which consisted of chips and cookies but nothing for this resident on a pureed diet, and the facility offered this resident pudding each night for his/her night time snack. On 12/19/12 at 1:00 P.M. the resident could not recall what he/she had eaten for lunch, the resident stated a couple of times he/she felt fine when asked about his/her lunch meal. During interview with licensed nurse H on 12/19/12 at approximately 3:10 P.M. staff stated Hospice discontinued the resident's Prosource on 12/17/12, he/she did not know why and the resident did not have a replacement nutritional supplement. Review of the resident's clinical record revealed the facility did not start the resident on a nutritional supplement after the Prosource was discontinued. During interview with administrative nursing staff D on 12/19/12 at approximately 3:30 P.M. he/she stated it was his/her understanding Hospice discontinued the Prosource and replaced it with another nutritional supplement. Administrative nursing staff D stated he/she was aware the resident had experienced a weight loss. The facility failed to monitor and implement effective interventions to address this resident who continued to lose weight.