Royal Care of Avon Park
Avon Park, Florida · CCN 105812
18 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2024.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 72
- Surveys
- 18
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 90
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Highlands
- Medicare-certified since
- 1993
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 56 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Florida.
Last survey on record
Feb 19, 2026
263 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.15 | 3.65 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.84 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 45.4% | 40.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $17,342 across 2 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G13.8% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1661.5% | E830.8% | F13.8% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6842×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F7602×
Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
- F7612×
Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
- F8802×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5501×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Royal Care of Avon Park, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF686May 9, 2024
Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to identify a new area of skin impairment, until it was an advanced stage pressure ulcer for one resident (#58) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. This failure resulted in actual harm because a facility-acquired unstageable pressure ulcer, which is an advanced stage of skin breakdown that is full-thickness tissue loss is difficult to heal, at increased risk for infection, and disfiguring. The findings included: On 5/7/24 at 10:45 AM, Resident #58 was cycling in the therapy gym. He said that he got a Stage 4 pressure ulcer on his back because the facility didn't do anything after they discovered the pressure ulcer. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF867May 9, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) practice that demonstrated identification, monitoring and implementation of an effective action plan to correct citations related to failing to ensure a medication administration error rate of less than 5%. A total of forty-three medication administration opportunities were observed with twenty-two errors for three (#5, #10, and #12) of five residents observed (F759). This resulted in a medication administration error rate of 51.16% during the revisit survey conducted 7/17/2024. Findings included: A review of Resident #5's medical record revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF867May 9, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) practice that demonstrated identification, monitoring and implementation of an effective action plan to correct citations related to failing to ensure a medication administration error rate of less than 5%. A total of forty-three medication administration opportunities were observed with twenty-two errors for three (#5, #10, and #12) of five residents observed (F759). This resulted in a medication administration error rate of 51.16% during the revisit survey conducted 7/17/2024. Findings included: A review of Resident #5's medical record revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF584May 9, 2024
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment, in that the facility was not free from offensive odors. This involved the front lobby area, the area in front of the [NAME] nurses' station, and four resident rooms (Rm103, Rm107, Rm109 and Rm110) out of 18 resident rooms on the [NAME] unit. Findings included: On 5/6/24 at 9:00 a.m. the lobby smelled of old urine when the survey team entered the facility. At 11:10 a.m. the area in front of the [NAME] nurses' station smelled of old urine. On 5/6/24 at 2:31 p.m. room [ROOM NUMBER] had a very offensive odor in the room, that was not urine. On 5/7/24 at 10:03 a.m. room [ROOM NUMBER] had an offensive odor that was not urine. On 5/7/24 at 10:38 a.m. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF645May 9, 2024
Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility's policy the facility failed to ensure the Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was accurate for four residents (#15, #26, #28, #38) of 17 residents sampled for PASARR review. Findings included: Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included vascular dementia severe, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of the Level I PASARR, dated 7/31/23, showed qualifying diagnoses were not checked or indicated, and that no Level II PASARR was required. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 72 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Feb 19, 2026Complaint1 finding
- May 9, 2024Standard19 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 22, 2021Standard2 findings
- Sep 23, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Mar 13, 2020Standard6 findings
- Aug 12, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Nov 30, 2018Standard6 findings
- Sep 7, 2017Standard2 findings
Show the 10 earlier surveys
- Jun 17, 2016Standard4 findings
- Feb 17, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Jul 17, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Feb 28, 2015Standard11 findings
- Dec 6, 2013—6 findings
- Jul 30, 2013—2 findings
- Sep 20, 2012—2 findings
- Nov 9, 2011—1 finding
- Aug 5, 2011—3 findings
- Sep 1, 2010—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction