Aviata at Lakeside Oaks
Dunedin, Florida · CCN 105132
28 surveys since 2010, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 102
- Surveys
- 28
- Harm or worse
- 5
- Immediate jeopardy
- 4
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 93
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- AVIATA HEALTH GROUP
- County
- Pinellas
- Medicare-certified since
- 1967
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 56 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Florida.
Last survey on record
Oct 21, 2025
384 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.36 | 3.65 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.47 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 48.2% | 40.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $8,788 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G15.6% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1161.1% | E633.3% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Aviata at Lakeside Oaks, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF699Oct 21, 2025
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility did not ensure the care plan was updated and individualized interventions were in place after a reportable adverse event, that resulted in re-traumatization, for one resident (#1) out of one resident reviewed.Findings included: On 10/21/25 at 10:58 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #1. She said an event occurred at the facility on 9/4/25. She said she had a bowel movement and relied on the staff to change her. She said around 5:00 or 6:00 p.m., on 9/4/25, she requested a female staff to assist with changing her. Resident #1 said she was told by a male staff the female staff member was busy, and she could wait until about 7:30 p.m. She said she was not comfortable with a male staff member changing her. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF550Jul 30, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain dignity during a meal service for one resident (#84) out of six residents reviewed for dining, and did not ensure residents' rights to self determination regarding leave of absence (LOA) for two residents (#60 and #12) out of four residents reviewed. These failures resulted in Resident #84 not receiving a timely lunch meal and Residents #60 and #12 being restricted from leaving the facility. Findings include: On 7/27/26 at 12:25 p.m., an observation showed Resident #84's roommate received a lunch tray and began eating in their shared room. At 12:48 p.m., Resident #84 walked into the hallway and asked Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), where his lunch was. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF610Oct 21, 2025
Based on interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure two allegations of abuse were investigated thoroughly for two residents (#1 and #2) out of four residents with reportable incidents reviewed.Findings included: 1.) On 10/21/25 at 10:58 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #1. She said an event occurred at the facility on 9/4/25. She said she had a bowel movement and relied on the staff to change her. She said around 5:00 or 6:00 p.m., on 9/4/25, she requested a female staff to assist with changing her. Resident #1 said she was told by a male staff the female staff member was busy, and she could wait until about 7:30 p.m. She said she was not comfortable with a male staff member changing her. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF627Aug 28, 2025
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe and orderly discharge for one residents (#1) and failed to follow up post discharge for two residents (#1 and #10) out of three residents sampled.Findings included:1. Review of Resident #1's admission record showed he was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 6/20/25 to Private home/apt.(apartment) with no home health services: Home. Resident #1's medical diagnoses including the following: Stage 3 pressure ulcer of sacral region, paraplegia, chronic pain and osteomyelitis of the spine. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF755Aug 28, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate records of controlled substances and ensure narcotics were reconciled as required for three residents (#2, #3, and #4) out of three sampled residents.Findings included:On 8/27/2025 at 10:03 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #3. Over a week ago the resident did not receive the prescribed oxycodone 10 mg during an evening shift. The resident stated the pain medication was due at 6:00 p.m. Staff U, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), was asked several times to administer the medication. The resident did not receive the medication until the next shift. […]
Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 102 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 30, 2026Standard5 findings
- Oct 21, 2025Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 28, 2025Complaint3 findings
- Jan 25, 2024Standard2 findings
- Dec 7, 2022Complaint3 findings
- Dec 22, 2021Standard and complaint10 findings
- Jul 27, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Mar 13, 2020Standard1 finding
Show the 20 earlier surveys
- Sep 16, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Dec 12, 2018Standard and complaint7 findings
- Oct 29, 2018Complaint2 findings
- May 3, 2018Complaint3 findings
- Dec 14, 2017Standard6 findings
- Oct 16, 2017Complaint2 findings
- May 3, 2017Complaint4 findings
- Nov 4, 2016Standard8 findings
- Aug 17, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Oct 14, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Jul 16, 2015Standard8 findings
- Apr 1, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Jul 11, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Apr 24, 2014Standard6 findings
- Oct 4, 2013—4 findings
- Apr 12, 2013—4 findings
- Oct 12, 2012—6 findings
- Aug 23, 2012—1 finding
- May 17, 2012—5 findings · 4 harm
- Oct 25, 2010—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- North Campus Rehabilitation and Nursing CenterLeesburgno harm findings
- Beach Street Health and Rehabilitation CenterDaytona Beach1 harm finding
- Vivo Healthcare WauchulaWauchulano harm findings
- Biscayne Health and Rehabilitation CenterNorth Miami1 harm finding
- Royal Care of Avon ParkAvon Park1 harm finding
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction