Deficiency Index

Roselawn Manor

Spencerville, Ohio · CCN 365744

14 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2016.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
54
Surveys
14
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file11/14

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
49
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
HCF MANAGEMENT
County
Allen
Medicare-certified since
1989

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
2
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 188 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Ohio.

Last survey on record

May 28, 2026

165 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.483.57
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.59—
Annual nurse turnover44.7%46.9%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1976.0%E312.0%F312.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 25 of the 54 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6862×

    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.

  • F6932×

    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F8802×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5821×

    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Roselawn Manor, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF727May 28, 2026

    Based on facility staffing review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure at least eight hours of consecutive Registered Nurse (RN) coverage per day for seven days. This had the potential to affect all residents who reside in the facility. The facility census was 40.Findings include:Review of the nursing staff schedule from 05/19/26 to 05/25/26 revealed no documentation to support the facility had eight hours of consecutive RN coverage on 05/23/26 and 05/24/26.Interview on 05/28/26 at 11:00 A.M., the Administrator verified the facility did not have eight hours of consecutive RN coverage on 05/23/26 and 05/24/26.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF838May 28, 2026

    Based on facility document review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Facility Assessment included the overall number of facility staff needed to ensure sufficient number of qualified staff are available to meet the residents' needs. This had the potential to affect all the residents. The facility census was 40.Findings include:Review of the Facility assessment dated [DATE], which was reviewed on 03/12/26 revealed no documentation to support the facility determined the number of qualified staff needed to provide care for the residents. During an interview on 05/27/26 at 2:43 P.M., the Administrator confirmed the Facility Assessment did not contain documentation to support the facility determining the number of staff that would be needed to provide care for the residents.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880May 28, 2026

    Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were followed. This affected one (#48) of four residents reviewed for EBP. The facility failed to ensure glucometers were sanitized following accuchecks. This had the potential to affect seven (#8, #9, #11, #20, #28, #32, and #41) who the facility identified as receiving accuchecks testing on the E and D-halls. The facility also failed to ensure the measures to prevent the growth of Legionella were completed. This had the potential to affect all residents who reside in the facility. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF761May 28, 2026

    Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure medications were not left at the bedside. This affected one (#33) of four residents observed during med pass. The facility identified 10 residents (#9, #14, #16, #22, #27, #31, #32, #33, #38 and #41) who were independently mobile whether ambulatory or wheelchair on D-hall. The facility census was 40. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #33 revealed an admission date of 11/15/24 with diagnoses including but not limited to epilepsy, nonrheumatic aortic (valve) stenosis, hypertension, and cognitive communication deficit.Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #33 had moderate cognitive impairment. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812May 28, 2026

    Based on observation, staff interview and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen stored, prepared, distributed and served food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This had the potential to affect 36 out of 40 residents who received food from the kitchen. Four Residents (#23, 26,37, and 48) do not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 40.Findings include:Observation of the kitchen on 05/26/26 at 7:47 A.M., with [NAME] #265, revealed one six pound eleven ounce can of crushed pineapple, approximately half full, and one seven pound empty chocolate pudding can being stored under the three compartment sink with the lids left open and positioned upright. Both cans contained black residue on the interior and exterior surfaces. […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 54 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 28, 2026Standard13 findings
  • Jul 27, 2023Standard5 findings
  • Apr 1, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 4, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • May 29, 2019Complaint4 findings
  • Feb 21, 2019Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Dec 28, 2017Standard2 findings
  • Sep 29, 2016Standard3 findings
Show the 6 earlier surveys
  • Aug 26, 2016Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Dec 17, 2015Standard5 findings
  • Oct 14, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 5, 2015Standard2 findings
  • Dec 6, 2012—3 findings
  • Aug 10, 2011—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction