Deficiency Index

Rosecrest Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center

Inman, South Carolina · CCN 425376

16 surveys since 2010, 7 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
62
Surveys
16
Harm or worse
7
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2025
’10’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse7

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file14/16

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
75
Ownership
Non profit - Church related
Chain
Independent
County
Spartanburg
Medicare-certified since
2001

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
4
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=4, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Feb 27, 2025

620 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.414.08
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.52—
Annual nurse turnover40.0%41.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD375.0%E—F125.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 4 of the 62 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Rosecrest Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Feb 27, 2025

    Based on review of the facility policy, observations, and interview, the facility failed to ensure foods were properly labeled, stored, and discarded in 1 of 1 main kitchens. Findings include: Review of the undated facility policy titled Food Storage, documented, Policy: . Food will be stored at appropriate temperatures and by methods designed to prevent contamination or cross contamination. Procedure: 7. All stock must be rotated . Rotating stock is essential to assure the freshness and highest quality of all foods. B. Food should be dated as it is placed on the shelves . c. Date marking should be visible of all high risk food to indicate the date by which a ready-to-eat TCS food should be consumed, sold or discarded. d. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF761Feb 27, 2025

    Amended [DATE] Based on review of the facility policy, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to: 1. properly lock and secure two medication carts on the Overlook Point Unit for one of the two units. This failure created a situation where residents, staff, or visitors could have accessed medications without the nurse's awareness. 2. ensure the emergency kit contents were replaced, and medications were not expired in one of the two medication rooms and one of the three medication carts. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Labeling and Storage dated February 2023, states under the policy: Compartments, including but not limited to drawers, carts . […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF689May 25, 2023

    Based on observation, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident (R)25) of 2 residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, R25 sustained a fall when two staff failed to utilize a mechanical lift to transfer the resident. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy/procedure titled, Lifting Machine, Using a Mechanical with a revision date of July 2021, revealed, The purpose of this procedure is to establish the general principles of safe lifting using a mechanical lifting device. The policy indicated, 1. Mechanical lifts may be used for tasks that require: b. Transferring a resident from bed to chair; c. Lateral transfers. The policy further revealed, 2. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF758May 25, 2023

    Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a psychotropic medication ordered to be administered pro re nata (PRN; as needed) had a stop date after fourteen days or physician justification for extension of the PRN order beyond fourteen days for 1 (Resident (R)20) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Medication Monitoring Medication Management dated 2007, specified, Additional specific guidelines are applied to Psychotropic drugs which are defined as any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior. This includes, but are not limited to Antipsychotics; Antidepressants; Anti-anxiety; and Hypnotics. […]

Read 27 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 27 of 62 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Feb 27, 2025Standard2 findings
  • May 25, 2023Standard2 findings
  • Sep 5, 2019Standard and complaint5 findings
  • Jul 11, 2018Standard1 finding
  • Mar 23, 2017Standard3 findings
  • Jun 2, 2016Standard1 finding
  • Feb 5, 2015Standard4 findings
  • Mar 25, 2014Standard and complaint8 findings
Show the 8 earlier surveys
  • Mar 26, 2013—2 findings · 2 harm
  • Dec 27, 2012—1 finding
  • Nov 15, 2012—10 findings · 2 harm
  • Oct 10, 2012—7 findings · 2 harm
  • Jun 25, 2012—1 finding
  • May 15, 2012—4 findings
  • Dec 7, 2011—2 findings
  • Sep 8, 2010—9 findings · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction