Deficiency Index

Pocotaligo River Health And Rehab

Manning, South Carolina · CCN 425114

14 surveys since 2011, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
73
Surveys
14
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse3

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file9/14

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
88
Ownership
Non profit - Other
Chain
Independent
County
Clarendon · rural
Medicare-certified since
1978

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
4
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=12, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jan 11, 2026

302 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.114.08
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.56—
Annual nurse turnover46.2%41.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$12,805 across 2 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG18.3%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD866.7%E18.3%F216.7%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 12 of the 73 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F8802×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6001×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F6281×

    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.

  • F6561×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Pocotaligo River Health And Rehab, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Jan 11, 2026

    Based on interview, record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure a safe transfer for 1 (Resident (R)2) of 4 residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, R2 was transferred without the use of a sit to stand lift by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) resulting in fractures to the resident's left ankle. Findings included: An admission Record revealed the facility admitted R2 on 06/19/2023. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of rheumatoid arthritis, anemia, diabetes, right hip osteoarthritis, muscle weakness, anxiety, depression, hypertension, neoplasm of the colon, repeated falls, low back pain, unsteadiness of feet, muscle weakness, radiculopathy, and dementia. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Aug 21, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff performed adequate hand hygiene while washing dishes in 4 of 5 kitchens and failed to ensure kitchen staff thoroughly air-dried pans prior to storage in the main kitchen. Failure to perform adequate hand hygiene before touching clean dishes and not thoroughly drying pans can have the potential to lead to contamination and the increased risk of foodborne illness. This had the potential to affect 74 of 77 residents in the facility who received dietary services.Findings include:Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Dishwashing Manual and Dishwashing: Machine Operation revealed, Policy: . 6. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jul 24, 2024

    Based on review of facility policy, observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate labeling and dating of foods. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure cold foods are held at safe temperatures. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Labeling, Dating Foods (Date Marking) dated 2020, revealed, Procedure: 2. Date marking for refrigerated storage food items. Once a case is opened, the individual, refrigerated food items are dated with the date the item was received into the facility and place in/on proper storage location utilizing the first in-first out method of rotation. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Jul 24, 2024

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, review of facility policy, and manufacturer recommendations, the facility failed to ensure the proper cleaning and disinfection of a glucometer for 1 of 4 medication pass observations of finger stick blood sugars. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure staff used appropriate PPE (personal protective equipment) when handling soiled laundry for 2 of 2 staff observed processing laundry. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Glucometer Disinfection dated 2024, states, The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the disinfection of capillary-blood glucose sampling devices to prevent transmission of blood borne diseases to resident and employees . […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF628Aug 21, 2025

    Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure 1 resident or resident representative (RP) of 1 resident (Resident (R)6) reviewed for hospitalization, received written notice that specified the duration of the bed hold policy. Specifically, the facility failed to include the current rate for the reserve bed payment in the event the resident did not return within ten (10) days, leaving the resident without all the necessary decision-making information.Findings include:Review of the facility's undated policy titled, ''Bed Hold Notice'' indicated that ''It is the policy of this facility to provide written information to the resident and/or the resident representative bed hold practices both well in advance, and at the time of, a transfer for… […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 73 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jan 11, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Aug 21, 2025Standard3 findings
  • Sep 12, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 24, 2024Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Aug 5, 2022Standard1 finding
  • Apr 6, 2018Standard14 findings
  • Jan 24, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 2, 2017Standard10 findings
Show the 6 earlier surveys
  • Mar 17, 2016Standard3 findings
  • Nov 13, 2014Standard10 findings
  • Jun 6, 2013—15 findings · 2 harm
  • Sep 19, 2012—3 findings
  • Sep 26, 2011—1 finding
  • Aug 29, 2011—3 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction