Rockingham County Nursing Home
Brentwood, New Hampshire · CCN 305046
10 surveys since 2010, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 30
- Surveys
- 10
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 226
- Ownership
- Government - County
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Rockingham
- Medicare-certified since
- 1995
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=5, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Aug 28, 2025
438 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.84 | 4.58 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.83 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 56.3% | 34.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D4100.0% | E— | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Rockingham County Nursing Home, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF552Aug 28, 2025
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to inform residents or residents' representative of the risk and benefits of psychotropic medication use for 1 out of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications in final sample of 27 residents. (Resident identifier is #4) Findings include:Resident #4Review on 8/28/25 of Resident #4's medical record revealed a physician's order for Escitalopram Oxalate 5 milligrams (MG), give 15MG by mouth one time a day for mood, dated 9/30/2024. Further record review revealed there was no documentation that the risks and benefits of psychotropic medication use were communicated to Resident #4 or their representative.Interview on 8/28/25 at approximately 8:28 a.m. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF761Aug 28, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed follow currently accepted professional principles for labeling and/or storing drugs and biologicals in 2 of 2 medication rooms, 1 of 3 medication carts observed. (Resident identifiers are #98, #14, #43, #134, #96, and #10.)Findings include: Observation on 8/26/25 at approximately 8:25 a.m. in [NAME] 1 Medication Room of a cabinet of medications revealed:Resident #98's medication card of Furosemide 20 mg (milligrams), expiration date 7/12/25; and Resident #14's medication card of Ariprazole 15 mg, expiration date 7/15/25.Interview on 8/26/25 at approximately 8:25 a.m. with Staff A (Registered Nurse) confirmed the above findings.Observation on 8/26/25 at approximately 8:35 a.m. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF812Aug 28, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to store and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety to prevent foodborne illness in 2 of 4 kitchenettes observed. Findings include: Review on 8/29/25 of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Food Code, dated 2017, retrieved from https://www.fda.gov/food/FDA-food-code/food-code-2017 revealed the following: .Annex 3, Public Health Reasons/Administrative Guidelines . Chapter 3 Food .3-305.11 Food Storage .FOOD shall be protected from contamination by storing the FOOD: . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF880Aug 28, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff wore PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) appropriately for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for Transmission Based Precautions in a final sample of 27 residents. (Resident identifier is #144.)Findings include: Observation on 8/28/25 from approximately 8:05 to 8:10 a.m. outside of Resident #144's room revealed signage to see nurse prior to entering the room. Further observation revealed Staff E (Registered Nurse) at Resident #144's bedside with a gown covering their arms but not covering their shoulders. The top half of their torso was showing and the gown was not tied. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF658Jun 17, 2021
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for the proper positioning of a resident's catheter drainage bag for 1 resident of 1 resident reviewed with a catheter in a final survey sample of 19 residents. (Resident identifier #49) Findings include: Potter, Patricia A., Perry, Anne Griffin, and et al Essentials For Nursing Practice Ninth Ed St. Louis Missouri: Elsevier 2019 copyright. Page 1054. Step 21 .Position drainage bag lower than bladder by attaching to bed frame. Do not attach to side rails of bed or place on the floor. Observation on 6/16/21 at 8:53 a.m. revealed Resident #49's bed was in the lowest position to the floor. The catheter drainage bag was attached to the bed frame. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 30 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 28, 2025Standard4 findings
- Jun 17, 2021Standard1 finding
- Oct 8, 2020Complaint3 findings
- Feb 24, 2017Standard2 findings
- Mar 5, 2015Standard4 findings
- Apr 24, 2014Standard5 findings
- Jul 11, 2013—3 findings
- Dec 22, 2011—2 findings
Show the 2 earlier surveys
- Aug 11, 2011—4 findings
- Sep 23, 2010—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction