River Valley Care Center
Live Oak, California · CCN 555535
36 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2015.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 177
- Surveys
- 36
- Harm or worse
- 8
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 99
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- PACS GROUP
- County
- Sutter
- Medicare-certified since
- 1993
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 423 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in California.
Last survey on record
Nov 6, 2025
368 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.04 | 4.16 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.79 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 32.3% | 37.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G11.9% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3362.3% | E1528.3% | F47.5% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8804×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6563×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6583×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F6843×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F6893×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at River Valley Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, patternF684Jan 2, 2024
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) to attain or maintain Resident 1's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing in accordance with Resident 1's comprehensive assessment and plan of care when: 1. Resident 1's urinalysis (UA, a urine specimen that determines if there is a bacterial infection in the urine) was not obtained when the physician placed the order on 11/9/2023. 2. The facility failed to notify the physician that the above order was not completed. 3. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF692Dec 7, 2021
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status when staff did not identify insidious weight loss (gradual, unintended, progressive weight loss over time), implement or modify a plan of care that was individualized and consistent with the resident's needs or preferences for one of four sampled residents. (Resident 19) These failures resulted in severe weight loss and put Resident 19 at risk for further health decline. Findings: Review of the policy and procedure titled, Weight Assessment and Intervention, dated 2001 and revised April 2012, indicated the Dietician will review the resident's weights, following trends over time. Negative weight trends will be evaluated by the treatment team. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jun 20, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was sanitary and food was stored, prepared, and distributed in accordance with food safety when: 1. The low temp dishwasher sanitizing solution did not meet manufacturer guidelines. 2. Primary handwashing skink for dietary staff was low flow and not warm. 3. Tortillas were not dated once received and were expired. 4. Dirty dishes were found placed under kitchen preparation area. 5. The lid for the dry powder thickener was kept open when not in use. 6. Thickened milk in the fridge was not dated when created. These failures had the potential to result in cross contamination and place residents at risk for developing a foodborne illness. Findings: 1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF841Apr 17, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the Medical Director (MD) supervised the development and implementation of mitigating a scabies outbreak that effected 31 residents. This failure resulted in a six-month scabies outbreak in the facility. Findings: A review of Medical Directorship Agreement, dated 01/01/2019 indicates the MD is involved at all levels of individualized patient care and supervision, and for all persons served by the facility. The MD services as the clinician who oversees and guides the care that is provided'. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF865Apr 17, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have an effective Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI - a quality management program which takes a systematic, interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and data-driven approach to maintaining and improving safety and quality) when the committee did not develop, implement, and identify performance improvement activities related to a scabies outbreak. Refer to F 880 and F 658. This resulted in 31 residents and all staff, vendors, and visitors being at risk for exposure to scabies. […]
Read 28 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 28 of 177 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Nov 6, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jun 20, 2025Standard14 findings
- Apr 17, 2025Complaint4 findings
- Feb 13, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jan 6, 2025Complaint4 findings
- Oct 10, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Jul 11, 2024Standard6 findings
- Mar 27, 2024Complaint1 finding
Show the 28 earlier surveys
- Jan 2, 2024Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 11, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Nov 7, 2022Complaint5 findings
- Dec 7, 2021Standard17 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 10, 2021Complaint3 findings
- May 11, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Dec 16, 2020Infection control2 findings
- Oct 29, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Feb 24, 2020Complaint3 findings
- Dec 27, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Nov 1, 2019Complaint1 finding
- May 9, 2019Standard6 findings
- Apr 26, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Sep 5, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Feb 18, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Feb 17, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Feb 16, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Feb 9, 2018Complaint1 finding
- May 16, 2017Standard12 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 24, 2016Standard26 findings · 3 harm
- Feb 12, 2016Complaint3 findings
- Jan 28, 2015Standard and complaint18 findings · 2 harm
- Dec 16, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Dec 5, 2013—12 findings
- Nov 27, 2013—1 finding
- Dec 4, 2012—7 findings
- Dec 30, 2011—4 findings
- Nov 18, 2010—8 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction