River Park Post Acute
Chandler, Arizona · CCN 035251
14 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2022.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 51
- Surveys
- 14
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 66
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- THE ENSIGN GROUP
- County
- Maricopa
- Medicare-certified since
- 1998
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 15 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Arizona.
Last survey on record
Apr 11, 2025
577 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.65 | 4.22 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.61 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 53.1% | 45.1% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G19.1% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D981.8% | E19.1% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at River Park Post Acute, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Dec 29, 2022
Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure a safe transfer using a Hoyer lift for one resident (#91). The deficient practice resulted in a fall with major injury. Findings include: Resident #91 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia, hemiparesis, hypertension, and CAD (coronary artery disease). The ADL (activities of daily living) care plan initiated on March 22, 2022 included resident required assistance with ADLs due to decreased mobility, weakness, right hemiparesis/hemiplegia, poor gait and unsteady balance. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF886Dec 29, 2022
Based on facility documentation, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that three staff members (#18, #42 and #58) were tested for COVID-19 at the required frequency during an outbreak status. The deficient practice could result in spread of COVID-19 infection to residents and staff. Findings include: Review of facility documentation revealed the facility had a recent COVID-19 outbreak on December 5, 2022. Review of the facility testing record for three staffs (#18, #42 and #58) revealed that the staffs #18, #42 and #58 were not tested twice weekly after the outbreak as required. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF756Dec 9, 2021
Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacist recommendations were followed through for one resident #17. The sample size was 5. The deficient practice could result in pharmacist recommendations not being acted upon. Findings include: Resident #17 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included personal history of other malignant neoplasm of bronchus and lung, COVID-19, pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit, and pulmonary fibrosis. A physician's order dated May 13, 2021 included for [MEDICATION(S)] 200 mg (milligram) by mouth daily for lung cancer. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Dec 9, 2021
Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure that food was stored in accordance with food safety standards and one staff member (staff #57) wore a hair restraint while in the kitchen. The deficient practice could result in poor food quality and/or foodborne illness. Findings include: -An observation of the kitchen walk-in refrigerator was conducted at 08:28 a.m. on [DATE]. Two items were observed with a placed date and used by date that had expired. The first item was chocolate sauce in a one cup stainless container with a placed date of [DATE] and a use by date of [DATE]. The second item was a bag of peeled garlic (approximately 2 pounds) in a plastic bag with a placed date of [DATE] and a use by date of [DATE]. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF561Apr 11, 2025
Based on clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to promote and facilitate residents' self-determination through a resident's choice of clothing for one of one sampled residents (#9). This deficient practice could lead to residents having feelings of unimportance and lack of dignity. Findings Include: Resident #9 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included history of transient ischemic attack, and cerebral infarction, protein-calorie malnutrition, major depressive disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cognitive communication deficit and chronic instability of knee. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 51 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 11, 2025Standard and complaint5 findings
- Dec 29, 2022Standard and complaint6 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 9, 2021Standard8 findings
- Jan 21, 2021Infection control1 finding
- Sep 5, 2019Standard4 findings
- Aug 2, 2018Standard3 findings
- Jun 1, 2017Standard1 finding
- Apr 21, 2016Standard6 findings
Show the 6 earlier surveys
- Jan 23, 2015Standard and complaint5 findings
- Oct 3, 2013—2 findings
- Aug 16, 2012—6 findings
- Jul 7, 2011—1 finding
- Jan 5, 2011—1 finding
- Oct 27, 2010—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction