Deficiency Index

Rising Star Nursing Center

Rising Star, Texas · CCN 675832

19 surveys since 2010, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
65
Surveys
19
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2025
’10’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file16/19

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
60
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
Independent
County
Eastland · rural
Medicare-certified since
2000

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
3
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=18, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Dec 5, 2025

339 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.783.40
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.66—
Annual nurse turnover48.6%50.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD538.5%E861.5%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 13 of the 65 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8802×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6551×

    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted

  • F6561×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6571×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F6861×

    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Rising Star Nursing Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 12, 2022

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to properly store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed. The facility failed to ensure foods were sealed and/or labeled properly in refrigerators. The facility failed to ensure areas in the kitchen were clean, exposing food and equipment to unsanitary conditions. These failures could place residents that eat out of the kitchen at risk for food borne illnesses. Findings included: Observation of Kitchen on [DATE] between 9:30 AM and 10:20 AM revealed: Fridge #1 Top Shelf: A sealed plastic bag contained white frozen squares dated [DATE], not labeled with contents. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF656Dec 5, 2025

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person -centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a residents medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 3 of 8 residents (Residents #6, #25, #26, ) reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed for Resident #6's scalp wound.2. The facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed for Resident #25's psychosocial issues 3. The facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed for Resident #26's psychosocial issues. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF740Dec 5, 2025

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary behavioral health care to maintain their highest level of practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #25 and #26) reviewed for psychosocial adjustment.1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #25's had the services to cope with psychosocial issues related to statements of age-related wanting to die and feeling useless.2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #26's psychosocial triggers were addressed, the COTA failed to communicate a history of psychosocial distress that needed to be addressed. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF686Aug 9, 2024

    Based on observation, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that residents receive care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers and do not develop pressure ulcers unless the individual's clinical condition demonstrates that they were unavoidable; and residents with pressure ulcers receive necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 12 (Resident #27) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to assess Resident #27's pressure ulcer weekly. The facility failed to assess Resident #27's skin weekly. These failures could place residents at risk of infections and worsening of wounds. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF695Aug 9, 2024

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who needed respiratory care were provided respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 13 residents (Resident #133) reviewed for oxygen administration. The facility failed to ensure an Oxygen in Use sign was posted on the outside of Resident #133's door. These deficient practices could place residents who received oxygen and treatments at risk of respiratory infection. The findings include: Record review of Resident # 133's face sheet dated 08/09/2024 revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Asthma, and hypertension (high blood pressure). […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 65 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Dec 5, 2025Standard3 findings
  • Aug 9, 2024Standard6 findings
  • Jun 22, 2023Standard4 findings
  • May 12, 2022Standard5 findings
  • Oct 30, 2019Standard2 findings
  • Dec 13, 2018Standard2 findings
  • Oct 19, 2017Standard3 findings
  • Oct 1, 2015Standard1 finding
Show the 11 earlier surveys
  • Jan 13, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 13, 2014Standard9 findings
  • Mar 19, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 6, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 1, 2013—1 finding
  • Jul 11, 2013—11 findings
  • Jan 28, 2013—1 finding
  • Aug 2, 2012—3 findings
  • Jul 13, 2012—1 finding
  • Jun 16, 2011—7 findings
  • Oct 6, 2010—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction