Ridgmar Medical Lodge
Fort Worth, Texas · CCN 676101
40 surveys since 2011, 13 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 109
- Surveys
- 40
- Harm or worse
- 13
- Immediate jeopardy
- 11
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. 1 of these were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 155
- Ownership
- Government - Hospital district
- Chain
- PRIORITY MANAGEMENT
- County
- Tarrant
- Medicare-certified since
- 2006
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 70 government-run facilities with 128 or more beds in Texas.
Last survey on record
Jul 23, 2026
109 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.27 | 3.23 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.52 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 52.7% | 50.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $29,598 across 3 penalties
- Payment denials
- 1
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J39.1% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G13.0% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1957.6% | E1030.3% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6092×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
- F6442×
Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
- F6842×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F6932×
Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
- F7552×
Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Ridgmar Medical Lodge, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Aug 14, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for supervision. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1, who had a history of wandering for which he wore a WanderGuard device, was provided with adequate supervision to prevent him from exiting the building on 07/23/25. The resident was observed outside the facility by a staff member, and he was found on the sidewalk near a street sign outside the facility.The noncompliance was identified as past non-compliance. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on 07/23/25 and ended on 07/24/25. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Mar 13, 2024
Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse and exploitation for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse, neglect, and exploitation. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was protected from sexual abuse by Resident #2, who had a history of being inappropriate with female residents. Resident #1 reported that Resident #2 came into her room on 02/23/24 at 3:00 AM and removed her brief and attempted to have non-consensual intercourse with the resident. An IJ was identified on 03/13/24. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 10:45 AM. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF656Mar 13, 2024
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 (Resident #2) of 5 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's care plan included his behaviors and monitoring of his behaviors. An IJ was identified on 03/13/24. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 10:45 AM. While the IJ was removed on 3/13/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of Isolated and a severity level of potential for more than minimal harm because all staff had not been trained on documenting inappropriate behavior. This failure could place residents at risk of inappropriate sexual behaviors from other residents. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF925Nov 14, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to keep the facility free of pests for 2 of 6 halls (500 and 600) reviewed for pest control. The facility failed to prevent pests from entering the facility. On 10/21/24, Resident #162 was found in bed with fire ants on his body and he had been bit multiple times his torso, arms, and legs. This failure places residents at risk of serious physical harm from ant or other pest bites. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #162's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Feb 20, 2026
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen. 1.The facility failed to ensure the stand-by freezer food items were dated, labeled, and secured. 2. The facility failed to ensure the stand-by refrigerator food items were dated with the date opened or expiration date, labeled with the contents in the clear package or box, and secured and tightly sealed according to the facility policy. 3. The grease in the deep fryer was dirty with blackened grease and food particles around edges. […]
Read 31 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 31 of 109 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 23, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Apr 15, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Feb 20, 2026Standard4 findings
- Aug 14, 2025Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 8, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Nov 14, 2024Standard and complaint12 findings · 1 harm
- May 29, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Mar 13, 2024Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
Show the 32 earlier surveys
- Oct 12, 2023Standard6 findings
- Oct 4, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Aug 18, 2022Standard7 findings
- Mar 17, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jan 28, 2022Infection control2 findings
- Jan 20, 2022Infection control1 finding
- Sep 10, 2021Complaint4 findings
- Aug 11, 2021Infection control1 finding
- Jun 25, 2021Standard and complaint3 findings
- Apr 8, 2021Complaint3 findings
- Jul 17, 2020Infection control1 finding
- May 31, 2019Standard3 findings
- Sep 26, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Jun 15, 2018Complaint4 findings
- Jun 1, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Apr 20, 2018Standard4 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 10, 2017Standard and complaint4 findings
- Sep 7, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Apr 15, 2016Standard2 findings
- Apr 30, 2015Standard and complaint1 finding
- Nov 8, 2014Complaint2 findings
- Sep 29, 2014Complaint4 findings · 4 harm
- Jun 26, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Apr 10, 2014Standard and complaint2 findings
- Nov 18, 2013Complaint1 finding
- Sep 4, 2013—1 finding
- Aug 7, 2013—4 findings · 4 harm
- Apr 12, 2013—6 findings
- Apr 5, 2012—1 finding
- Feb 2, 2012—1 finding
- Jun 2, 2011—3 findings
- Mar 10, 2011—6 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction