Deficiency Index

Richmond Healthcare & Rehab Center

Richmond, Kansas · CCN 175444

25 surveys since 2011, 4 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
158
Surveys
25
Harm or worse
4
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file20/25

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
60
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
RECOVER-CARE HEALTHCARE
County
Franklin · rural
Medicare-certified since
2001

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
2
Staffing
4
Quality measures
1

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 108 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Kansas.

Last survey on record

Mar 23, 2026

231 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.793.78
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.72—
Annual nurse turnover53.6%50.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2365.7%E617.1%F617.1%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 35 of the 158 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6843×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F6252×

    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Richmond Healthcare & Rehab Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, widespreadF610Jan 6, 2021

    The facility reported a census of 39 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents of the facility from an alleged perpetrator (AP) when staff allowed the AP to work after they received notification of alleged abuse on 12/24/20. The facility received notification from a nursing staffing agency on 12/24/20 at 03:30 PM that a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M witnessed the alleged perpetrator, Temporary Nurse Aide (TNA- staff member that has completed a shortened training course to be able to do the duties of a CNA during the COVID-19 pandemic) LL hit Resident (R)4 in the mouth multiple times. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF730Feb 26, 2025

    The facility identified a census of 47 residents. The sample included 12 residents and five Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) reviewed for yearly performance evaluations and the associated in-service training. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one of the five CNA staff reviewed had yearly performance evaluations completed. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for inadequate care. Findings included: - A review of the facility's staffing list revealed the following CNA was employed with the facility for more than 12 months: CNA O, hired 03/06/23, had no yearly performance evaluation upon request. On 02/26/25 at 11:31 AM, Administrative Nurse D stated she was responsible for completing the nursing staff's yearly performance reviews. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF801Feb 26, 2025

    The facility identified a census of 47 residents and one kitchen. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide the services of a full-time certified dietary manager for the 47 residents who resided in the facility and received their meals from the kitchen. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate nutrition. Findings included: - On 02/25/25 at 02:30 PM, Administrative Staff A reported the facility currently did not have a certified dietary manager. On 02/26/25 at 11:00 AM, Dietary Staff BB stated she had been with the facility for over a year but was not certified. She stated the dietary manager came monthly. She stated she had not started classes but was looking into them. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Feb 26, 2025

    The facility identified a census of 47 residents with one kitchen. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow sanitary dietary standards related to storage, preparation, and meal service. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for food-borne illnesses and food safety concerns. Findings Included: - On 02/24/25 at 07:00 AM, a walkthrough of the facility was completed. An inspection of the dining hall revealed the dining room was closed off to the residents. The dining room ceiling fixtures hung from the ceiling. Dust covered the tables and floor of the dining room. No barriers were in place between the construction area and the food preparation areas. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF947Feb 26, 2025

    The facility had a census of 47 residents. Five Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) were sampled for required in-service training. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure five of the five CNA staff reviewed had the required 12 hours of in-service education. This placed the residents at risk for decreased quality of life and/or inadequate care. Findings included: - A review of the information facility's in-service records revealed the following CNAs were employed with the facility for more than 12 months: CNA O, hired 09/02/14, had not completed the required in-services in the past 12 months. CNA NN, hired 11/08/18, had not completed the required in-services in the past 12 months. […]

Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 158 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 23, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 26, 2025Standard19 findings
  • Oct 24, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 27, 2023Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Jan 9, 2023Complaint5 findings
  • Oct 4, 2021Standard5 findings
  • Jan 6, 2021Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 21, 2020Complaint2 findings
Show the 17 earlier surveys
  • Jul 22, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 23, 2019Standard3 findings
  • Dec 19, 2018Standard3 findings
  • Sep 27, 2018Complaint4 findings
  • Nov 9, 2017Standard and complaint13 findings
  • Jun 22, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 22, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 24, 2016Standard and complaint10 findings
  • Nov 14, 2014Standard and complaint17 findings
  • Jul 7, 2014Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • May 14, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 18, 2014—1 finding
  • Dec 13, 2013—2 findings
  • Aug 13, 2013—13 findings
  • Jun 20, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
  • May 4, 2012—12 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 23, 2011—28 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction