Easton Health Care Center
Easton, Kansas · CCN 175411
20 surveys since 2010, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 134
- Surveys
- 20
- Harm or worse
- 5
- Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 45
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Leavenworth
- Medicare-certified since
- 1997
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 108 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Kansas.
Last survey on record
Jan 13, 2026
300 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 2.63 | 3.78 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.67 | — |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $22,431 across 2 penalties
- Payment denials
- 1
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J12.5% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G25.0% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2460.0% | E25.0% | F922.5% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C25.0% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6893×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6572×
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
- F6862×
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Easton Health Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600May 1, 2024
The facility identified a census of 37 residents with three residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1 remained free from abuse and mistreatment. On 04/26/24 at approximately 04:10 AM, R1, who had a history of trauma and Huntington's disease (a rare abnormal hereditary condition characterized by progressive mental deterioration; a disabling central nervous system movement disorder), approached Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M and CNA O and asked for some chocolate milk saying chocky milk. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Jan 13, 2026
The facility identified a census of 39 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with one resident reviewed for pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent the development of an avoidable stage three (full-thickness pressure injury extending through the skin into the tissue below) pressure ulcer on Resident (R) 25's left heel.Findings included:- R25's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of embolism (an obstruction in a blood vessel due to a blood clot or other foreign matter that gets stuck while traveling through the bloodstream) and thrombosis (a… […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Jul 16, 2024
The facility identified a census of 34 residents with three residents reviewed for falls and accidents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1's safety during a transfer when Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M and Licensed Nurse (LN) G used a Hoyer lift (total body mechanical lift) to transfer R1 from her bed to her wheelchair. During the transfer, the lift tipped, and R1 hit the back of her head on a dresser. As a result, R1 sustained a laceration to the back of her head that required staples and sutures to close. This deficient practice also placed R1 at risk for pain and other avoidable injuries. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Jan 13, 2026
The facility had a census of 39 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections when the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organism which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care) were used for Resident (R) 4, who had a suprapubic catheter (urinary bladder catheter inserted through the abdomen into the bladder), failed to handle and transport soiled linen in a safe and sanitary manner, failed to ensure R4's catheter bag did not drag on the floor while in his… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF730Feb 28, 2024
The facility had a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents and three Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) reviewed for yearly performance evaluations. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure three CNA staff had the required yearly performance evaluations completed. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate care. Findings included: - A review of the facility's performance evaluation records revealed the following: CNA O, hired 06/18/21, no yearly performance evaluations were provided upon request. CNA P had a hire date of 09/05/22. The facility could not provide any evidence that a yearly evaluation had been performed in 2023. The facility provided an evaluation dated 02/26/24 ( two days after the start of the survey). […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 134 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jan 13, 2026Standard7 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 16, 2024Complaint7 findings · 1 harm
- May 1, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Feb 28, 2024Complaint16 findings
- Nov 29, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Sep 7, 2022Standard and complaint10 findings
- Apr 13, 2022Complaint2 findings
- Mar 22, 2021Standard4 findings
Show the 12 earlier surveys
- Jul 29, 2019Standard16 findings
- Jul 17, 2018Standard and complaint1 finding
- Jan 31, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Sep 21, 2016Standard and complaint10 findings
- Jan 22, 2016Complaint4 findings
- Nov 20, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Apr 29, 2015Standard and complaint17 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 12, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Jan 13, 2014—12 findings
- Sep 21, 2012—13 findings
- Jul 26, 2011—7 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 8, 2010—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction