Regency Gresham Nursing & Rehabilitation Center
Gresham, Oregon · CCN 385015
23 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 84
- Surveys
- 23
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 128
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- REGENCY PACIFIC MANAGEMENT
- County
- Multnomah
- Medicare-certified since
- 1967
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 111 for-profit facilities in Oregon.
Last survey on record
Sep 19, 2025
416 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 5.39 | 4.93 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.69 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 29.7% | 41.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1361.9% | E838.1% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F5842×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
- F6772×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
- F8122×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F5581×
Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
- F5771×
Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Regency Gresham Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF761Sep 19, 2025
Based on observations, interviews, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications were not expired for 2 of 8 medication storage areas. This placed residents at risk for decreased medication efficiency. Findings include:On 9/18/25 at 8:41 AM, an observation was made in the 300-hall medication cart with Staff 21 (CMA). An open bottle of calcium citrate plus vitamin D was observed in the medication cart with an expiration of 8/2025.On 9/18/25 at 8:52 AM, Staff 22 (LPN Resident Care Manager) acknowledged the expired bottle of calcium citrate plus vitamin D and stated medications were to be discarded when expired.On 9/18/2025 at 10:04 AM, Medication Storage room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with Staff 26 (Infection Preventionist), the following expired medication… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Sep 19, 2025
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure food and beverages were labeled and stored in a manner to minimize spoilage and cross contamination for 3 of 3 unit refrigerators and 1 of 2 kitchen refrigerators reviewed for sanitary conditions. This placed residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings include:Review of the US FDA 2022 Food Code indicated the following:-Food prepared and held cold must be clearly marked with date prepared or by day which the food shall be consumed or discarded.-Food must be labeled with a use-by date if stored for at least 24 hours. -Time/temperature control for safety foods must be stored within refrigeration units and held at temperatures of 41 degrees F or below. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF577Jul 1, 2024
Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were aware of the right to review survey results for 2 of 2 floors and failed to make survey results were readily accessible for 1 of 2 floors reviewed for resident rights. This placed residents and the public at risk for not being informed of the facility's survey history. Findings include: On 6/27/24 at a resident meeting at 2:00 PM residents asked if they were allowed to know the results of the current survey when it was completed. None of the 8 residents attending were aware there was a copy of the survey results located on the first floor near the elevator. Residents further stated most second floor residents could not easily access the first floor without assistance from staff. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF584Jul 1, 2024
Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to maintain a homelike and comfortable environment for 2 of 3 halls reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for living in an unkempt and uncomfortable environment. Findings include: 1. Observations of the facility's general environment and residents' rooms from 6/24/24 through 7/1/24 identified the following issues: -room [ROOM NUMBER] had wall damage behind the bed with missing paint and exposed drywall; -room [ROOM NUMBER] had wall damage behind the bed with missing paint, exposed drywall, several brown spots on the ceiling and a fan with dirty blades; -room [ROOM NUMBER] had wall damage on the right side of the bed with missing paint and exposed drywall; -room [ROOM NUMBER] had damage to the lower… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF623Jul 1, 2024
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman was notified of resident hospitalization s for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 40, 87 and 339) reviewed for hospitalization . This placed residents at risk for lack of advocacy by the Ombudsman's office. Findings include: 1. Resident 40 was admitted to the facility in 12/2023 with diagnoses including dementia and heart disease. Resident 40's 2/26/24 Discharge MDS indicated the resident was discharged to an acute care hospital. Review of Resident 40's health record revealed no documentation to indicate the state/local Ombudsman was notified Resident 40 was discharged to a hospital. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 84 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Sep 19, 2025Standard6 findings
- Jul 1, 2024Standard and complaint7 findings
- Apr 21, 2023Standard and complaint8 findings
- May 3, 2022Complaint3 findings
- May 6, 2019Standard and complaint7 findings
- Oct 15, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Mar 13, 2018Complaint3 findings
- Oct 6, 2017Standard2 findings
Show the 15 earlier surveys
- Sep 26, 2017Complaint5 findings
- Mar 10, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Nov 14, 2016Complaint6 findings
- Aug 16, 2016Standard4 findings
- Feb 25, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Jul 10, 2015Standard1 finding
- Jan 6, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Jun 24, 2014Standard5 findings
- Oct 21, 2013—2 findings
- Mar 7, 2013—1 finding
- Nov 16, 2012—9 findings
- Jun 26, 2012—1 finding
- May 3, 2012—1 finding
- Oct 17, 2011—3 findings
- Jun 17, 2011—5 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction