Deficiency Index

Regency Gresham Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

Gresham, Oregon · CCN 385015

23 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
84
Surveys
23
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file20/23

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
128
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
REGENCY PACIFIC MANAGEMENT
County
Multnomah
Medicare-certified since
1967

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
5
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 111 for-profit facilities in Oregon.

Last survey on record

Sep 19, 2025

416 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day5.394.93
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.69—
Annual nurse turnover29.7%41.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1361.9%E838.1%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 21 of the 84 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5842×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6772×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F5581×

    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

  • F5771×

    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Regency Gresham Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF761Sep 19, 2025

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications were not expired for 2 of 8 medication storage areas. This placed residents at risk for decreased medication efficiency. Findings include:On 9/18/25 at 8:41 AM, an observation was made in the 300-hall medication cart with Staff 21 (CMA). An open bottle of calcium citrate plus vitamin D was observed in the medication cart with an expiration of 8/2025.On 9/18/25 at 8:52 AM, Staff 22 (LPN Resident Care Manager) acknowledged the expired bottle of calcium citrate plus vitamin D and stated medications were to be discarded when expired.On 9/18/2025 at 10:04 AM, Medication Storage room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with Staff 26 (Infection Preventionist), the following expired medication… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Sep 19, 2025

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure food and beverages were labeled and stored in a manner to minimize spoilage and cross contamination for 3 of 3 unit refrigerators and 1 of 2 kitchen refrigerators reviewed for sanitary conditions. This placed residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings include:Review of the US FDA 2022 Food Code indicated the following:-Food prepared and held cold must be clearly marked with date prepared or by day which the food shall be consumed or discarded.-Food must be labeled with a use-by date if stored for at least 24 hours. -Time/temperature control for safety foods must be stored within refrigeration units and held at temperatures of 41 degrees F or below. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF577Jul 1, 2024

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were aware of the right to review survey results for 2 of 2 floors and failed to make survey results were readily accessible for 1 of 2 floors reviewed for resident rights. This placed residents and the public at risk for not being informed of the facility's survey history. Findings include: On 6/27/24 at a resident meeting at 2:00 PM residents asked if they were allowed to know the results of the current survey when it was completed. None of the 8 residents attending were aware there was a copy of the survey results located on the first floor near the elevator. Residents further stated most second floor residents could not easily access the first floor without assistance from staff. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF584Jul 1, 2024

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to maintain a homelike and comfortable environment for 2 of 3 halls reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for living in an unkempt and uncomfortable environment. Findings include: 1. Observations of the facility's general environment and residents' rooms from 6/24/24 through 7/1/24 identified the following issues: -room [ROOM NUMBER] had wall damage behind the bed with missing paint and exposed drywall; -room [ROOM NUMBER] had wall damage behind the bed with missing paint, exposed drywall, several brown spots on the ceiling and a fan with dirty blades; -room [ROOM NUMBER] had wall damage on the right side of the bed with missing paint and exposed drywall; -room [ROOM NUMBER] had damage to the lower… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF623Jul 1, 2024

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman was notified of resident hospitalization s for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 40, 87 and 339) reviewed for hospitalization . This placed residents at risk for lack of advocacy by the Ombudsman's office. Findings include: 1. Resident 40 was admitted to the facility in 12/2023 with diagnoses including dementia and heart disease. Resident 40's 2/26/24 Discharge MDS indicated the resident was discharged to an acute care hospital. Review of Resident 40's health record revealed no documentation to indicate the state/local Ombudsman was notified Resident 40 was discharged to a hospital. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 84 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Sep 19, 2025Standard6 findings
  • Jul 1, 2024Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Apr 21, 2023Standard and complaint8 findings
  • May 3, 2022Complaint3 findings
  • May 6, 2019Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Oct 15, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 13, 2018Complaint3 findings
  • Oct 6, 2017Standard2 findings
Show the 15 earlier surveys
  • Sep 26, 2017Complaint5 findings
  • Mar 10, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 14, 2016Complaint6 findings
  • Aug 16, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Feb 25, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 10, 2015Standard1 finding
  • Jan 6, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 24, 2014Standard5 findings
  • Oct 21, 2013—2 findings
  • Mar 7, 2013—1 finding
  • Nov 16, 2012—9 findings
  • Jun 26, 2012—1 finding
  • May 3, 2012—1 finding
  • Oct 17, 2011—3 findings
  • Jun 17, 2011—5 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction