Deficiency Index

Rainier Rehabilitation

Puyallup, Washington · CCN 505304

34 surveys since 2011, 21 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
149
Surveys
34
Harm or worse
21
Immediate jeopardy
13
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy13

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file33/34

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
117
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
THE ENSIGN GROUP
County
Pierce
Medicare-certified since
1986

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 49 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Washington.

Last survey on record

Aug 12, 2025

454 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day5.303.98
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.24—
Annual nurse turnover21.1%47.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD480.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C120.0%
CMS’s current file: 5 of the 149 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Rainier Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF584Mar 4, 2022

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment did not pose a safety risk to residents from water temperatures exceeding 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F- a scale of heat measurement) for 1 of 2 hot water boilers reviewed for environmental concerns. Failure to routinely monitor, record and ensure safe water temperatures in resident rooms and bathrooms placed residents at risk for injury and uncomfortable living conditions. Findings included . Observation in room 320 on 02/24/2022 at 11:25 AM showed the hot water from the bedroom sink after running for two minutes was 121.2 degrees F. Observation in room 327 on 02/24/2022 at 11:27 AM showed the hot water from the bedroom sink after running for two minutes was 120.8 degrees F. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF658Mar 4, 2022

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice for six of 28 sampled residents (Residents 26, 5, 20, 44, 136 and 31) reviewed. The facility nurses' failure to follow and/or clarify physician's orders [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Findings included . Please refer to F756 for additional information for Resident 136. Review of the facility's pharmacy's policy and procedure titled, 6.0 General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration, revision dated 01/01/2022 showed that prior to administration of medication, facility staff should take all measures required by facility policy and applicable law to include checking for allergies to medications. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF804Mar 4, 2022

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure proper consistency and nutritional value was maintained to meet the nutritional needs for four of four residents (Residents 58, 26, 49 and 286) who required their food in a pureed texture. The failure to follow the written recipe did not ensure the proper consistency or flavor of food served, and placed the residents at risk for a diminished dining experience, less than adequate nutritional intake potentially leading to a decreased quality of life. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Mar 4, 2022

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure multiple food items in the dietary department were properly stored, labeled, and that expired foods were identified and discarded. The facility also failed to ensure sanitary preparation of raw foods to prevent cross-contamination. The failure to properly store, label and prepare foods, including potentially hazardous foods, placed residents at risk for consuming expired/spoiled foods and at risk of exposure to food-borne illnesses. Findings included . CENTRAL KITCHEN STORAGE An observation of food storage in a small freezer on [DATE] at 10:37 AM, showed a chocolate cake and four pie crusts undated. Staff K, Dietary Supervisor (DS), took them and placed dates on the packaging when questioned. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF645Aug 12, 2025

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a level I Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR, a mental health screening tool) assessment was obtained prior to admission and was completed timely for 1 of 6 sample residents (Residents 49) reviewed for PASRRs or unnecessary medication use. This failure placed the resident at risk for unidentified mental health care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, PASRR screening for Mental Disorder/ Intellectual Disability, dated 01/22/2025 showed, The PASRR, process requires all individuals be screened for possible serious mental disorders or intellectual disabilities and related conditions. […]

Read 41 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 41 of 149 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 12, 2025Standard5 findings
  • Dec 7, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 4, 2022Standard17 findings
  • May 21, 2019Standard8 findings
  • Mar 19, 2018Standard and complaint10 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 10, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 7, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 26, 2017Complaint3 findings · 3 harm
Show the 26 earlier surveys
  • Aug 21, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 3, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 23, 2017Standard4 findings
  • Oct 28, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 19, 2016Standard7 findings
  • Apr 19, 2016Complaint17 findings · 13 harm
  • Jan 26, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 27, 2015Standard2 findings
  • Apr 15, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 6, 2014Standard10 findings
  • Sep 25, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
  • May 28, 2013—1 finding
  • Apr 8, 2013—15 findings
  • Jan 8, 2013—1 finding
  • Sep 20, 2012—2 findings
  • Jul 10, 2012—1 finding
  • May 23, 2012—10 findings
  • Mar 14, 2012—1 finding
  • Feb 28, 2012—2 findings · 2 harm
  • Feb 13, 2012—1 finding
  • Nov 28, 2011—1 finding
  • Aug 4, 2011—5 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 15, 2011—1 finding
  • Jul 8, 2011—11 findings
  • Mar 31, 2011—1 finding
  • Feb 10, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction