Deficiency Index

Queen Anne Nursing Home, Inc

Hingham, Massachusetts · CCN 225254

11 surveys since 2012, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
44
Surveys
11
Harm or worse
5
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2012–2024
’12’15’20’24
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse5

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file8/11

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
106
Ownership
For profit - Partnership
Chain
Independent
County
Plymouth
Medicare-certified since
1979

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
4
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 80 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Massachusetts.

Last survey on record

Jun 5, 2024

887 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.993.64
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.60—
Annual nurse turnover25.3%40.7%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1361.9%E523.8%F314.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 21 of the 44 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5802×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

  • F6561×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6581×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F6771×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

  • F6861×

    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Queen Anne Nursing Home, Inc, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689May 17, 2022

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents, (Resident #1), who was assessed by nursing as being at high risk for falls, and whose care plan for safety included the use of bed and chair alarms, the Facility failed to ensure his/her assistive devices were functioning properly to prevent incidents and/or accidents resulting in an injury. On 04/29/22, Resident #1's bed alarm had not sounded to alert staff that he/she was in motion, had gotten up out of bed, and ambulated him/herself to the bathroom, where he/she fell . Resident #1 was found sitting on the floor in the bathroom and noted to have a blue discoloration to his/her left thumb. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF656Jan 19, 2021

    Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was assessed as being at high risk for falls and whose plan of care indicated he/she required the assistance of two staff members for transfers between surfaces, the Facility failed to ensure staff implemented and followed interventions from his/her plan of care when, on 1/02/2021 at 9:45 A.M., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 attempted to transfer Resident #1 from bed to his/her wheelchair without another staff member present to assist her with the transfer, Resident #1 fell , sustained a 4 centimeter (cm) skin tear to his/her left forearm, which required treatment with steri-strips and a dressing, until healed. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Jan 19, 2021

    Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was assessed as being at high risk for falls and required the assistance of two staff members for transfers, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provided the appropriate level of staff assistance during a transfer to prevent an incident/accident with injury, when on 1/02/21, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 attempted to transfer Resident #1 from bed to his/her wheelchair without another staff member present to assist her with the transfer, Resident #1 fell , sustained a 4 centimeter (cm) skin tear on his/her left forearm, which required steri-strips and dressing changes, until healed. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF838Feb 14, 2023

    Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Facility Assessment was updated annually to accurately reflect the current status of the facility and to determine what resources are necessary to competently care for its residents during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment document indicated that it was completed/updated on 11/22/21 by previous leadership staff who were no longer employed at the facility. The current Administrator and Director of Nursing had started at the facility in 10/2022. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF886Feb 14, 2023

    Based on observations, interviews, policy review, and record review, the facility failed to ensure COVID-19 testing was conducted per facility policy and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance for two Residents (#43 and #55) with respiratory symptoms, in a total sample of 22 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled COVID-19- Testing Residents, dated as revised in September 2022, indicated the following: -Negative antigen tests (such as Binax) are considered presumptive. […]

Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 44 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 5, 2024Standard2 findings
  • Nov 1, 2023Complaint3 findings
  • Feb 14, 2023Standard16 findings
  • May 17, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jan 19, 2021Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Apr 11, 2017Standard3 findings
  • Mar 29, 2016Standard4 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 19, 2015Standard5 findings
Show the 3 earlier surveys
  • Oct 2, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 10, 2013—6 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 27, 2012—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction