Deficiency Index

Quantum Rehabilitation and Nursing LLC

Middle Island, New York · CCN 335719

20 surveys since 2011, 6 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
76
Surveys
20
Harm or worse
6
Immediate jeopardy
4
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy4

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file16/20

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
120
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
PARAGON HEALTHNET
County
Suffolk
Medicare-certified since
1992

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=11, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Feb 12, 2026

270 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.933.37
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.09—
Annual nurse turnover48.9%47.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD583.3%E—F116.7%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 6 of the 76 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Quantum Rehabilitation and Nursing LLC, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684Apr 22, 2021

    Based on record reviews and staff interviews during the Recertification and Abbreviated Survey (Complaint #NY 858) completed on 04/22/2021, the facility did not ensure that each resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically, Resident #135 had a history of [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Resident #135 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with instructions from the hospital to provide [MEDICATION(S)] 100 mg three times a day for a total of 300 milligrams (mg) per day. The resident received half the amount of [MEDICATION(S)] from 3/6/2020-3/23/2020. Subsequently, Resident #135 experienced [CONDITION(S)] activity with a subtherapeutic [MEDICATION(S)] level of 1.3 microgram/milliliter (mcg/mL) (therapeutic range 10-20 mcg/mL). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Feb 12, 2026

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility did not follow proper sanitation practices to prevent outbreak of foodborne illness and did not store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This was identified during the Kitchen Task. Specifically, the walk-in refrigerator was observed with multiple opened items with no opened date; there were expired milk containers and expired half and half containers; and a milk container soiled with a jellylike substance. A refrigerator containing deli cheeses, had an opened and used block of Swiss cheese that was not dated with the date it was opened. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF550Feb 12, 2026

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure that each resident was treated with respect and dignity and care in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #78) of one (1) resident reviewed for Elopement risk. Specifically, on 01/30/2026, Resident #78 visited the facility bakery for the first time. The facility staff inaccurately assessed Resident #78 to be at high risk for elopement based on the visit to the bakery. A wanderguard bracelet (a device that triggers alarms and can lock monitored doors to prevent the residents from leaving unattended) was erroneously placed on Resident #78. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF842Dec 23, 2024

    Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during the Complaint survey dated 12/17/2024, the facility did not ensure the each resident's medical record was maintained in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, the facility must maintain medical records on each resident that are Complete; Accurately documented; Readily accessible; and Systematically organized. Specifically, one Resident (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for medical records accuracy reflected documentation for neurological checks (an assessment to determine residents level of conciousness, neurological status and vital signs) dated 11/17/2024 at 6:30 AM thru 11/18/2024 at 2PM. Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital dated 11/17/2024 at 4:40PM via 911. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF657Jul 15, 2024

    Based on record review and interviews, during the recertification survey initiated on 7/8/2024 to 7/15/2024, the facility did not ensure a comprehensive person-centered care plan was developed with measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. This was identified for one (Resident #58) of four residents reviewed for Antibiotics. Specifically, Resident #58 was prescribed Minocycline (an Antibiotic medication) 100 milligrams capsule in February 2024; however, a Comprehensive Care Plan addressing the long-term use of Antibiotic therapy was not developed. […]

Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 76 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Feb 12, 2026Standard2 findings
  • Dec 23, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 15, 2024Standard1 finding
  • Jun 26, 2023Standard2 findings
  • Jun 30, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 22, 2021Standard and complaint4 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 7, 2020Infection control2 findings
  • Aug 19, 2020Complaint2 findings
Show the 12 earlier surveys
  • May 7, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 18, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Apr 10, 2019Standard6 findings
  • Oct 25, 2017Standard5 findings
  • Jul 28, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 29, 2016Standard3 findings
  • Sep 4, 2015Standard11 findings
  • Oct 23, 2014Standard11 findings
  • Aug 19, 2014Complaint4 findings · 4 harm
  • Sep 20, 2013—2 findings
  • Oct 17, 2012—6 findings
  • Oct 11, 2011—9 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction